Projects raising concerns

Fee increases, proposed charge for parking at park worry council member

By Prentiss Findlay
The Post and Courier
Thursday, October 9, 2008



MOUNT PLEASANT — Recent increases in stormwater, utility franchise and recreation fees and a proposal for $1 hourly parking at the Memorial Waterfront Park has Town Councilman Joe Bustos calling for a fresh look at municipal finances.

"We should not continue to fund that which will increase fees on our residents. Perhaps a moratorium on new projects is in order until this is resolved," Bustos said in an e-mail Wednesday to council members.

"I think we just need to take a break from all this stuff," Bustos said in an interview. "We ought to just slow down a little bit. Let the dust settle a little bit. People are just strapped to the limit."

The $14 million park, scheduled to open in May, would have about 250 parking spaces that could be used by Arthur Ravenel Jr. Bridge walkers and runners. The town has proposed banning Patriots Point Boulevard roadside parking for bridge walkers and runners because it is dangerous, and instead directing runners and walkers to free parking near Patriots Point or to the pay lot at the new park.

The road shoulder is a popular option for walkers and runners because it is free and close to the bridge.

Councilman Nick Collins said he supports a 50-cent-per-hour parking fee for the new Waterfront Park. "You can count on the people using the bridge to use the facilities provided at the Waterfront Park," he said.

The side of the road that bridge walkers and runners use to park is an accident waiting to happen, he said. "We are lucky nothing has happened to date. It just takes one and we (thetown) will be at fault," he said.

Councilman Paul Gawrych was receptive to Bustos' idea of taking another look at town finances. "I under

stand where he's coming from. Let's do a gut check here," Gawrych said.

He said he was open to exploring Bustos' proposal to find a way a pay for Waterfront Park operations and maintenance other than charging an hourly parking fee. But he doesn't think the town should risk losing momentum on projects such as the Waterfront Park because they are an investment in the community.

"I think that sitting still will let so much dust accumulate on you that you can't get out from under it," he said.

The town is paying for its $14 million park construction through tax increment financing, a method that borrows funds for improvements expected to increase property values, thereby generating more taxes to pay back the debt. Bustos said some of those funds could be set aside for park maintenance. A $1 hourly parking fee is projected to raise $400,000 annually for park operations and maintenance.

Councilman Gary Santos said tax increment financing funds by law have to be used for park construction only.

Increased stormwater fees were needed to pay for an unfunded federal mandate for a stormwater management program, he said. The annual stormwater fee for homeowners was raised from $18 to $30.

Patriots Point boulevard roadside parking for bridge walkers is dangerous, he said, and cars have been burglarized.

Bustos said he had read the statute governing use of tax increment financing funds, and he didn't think use of the funds for park maintenance was prohibited.

Double-digit growth has slowed to a trickle, which has created a need for other revenue to keep the town from relying too heavily on its savings account to weather the next three years, after which officials expect the economy to rebound. The town has frozen 40 positions, including seven police officers and four firefighters.

Town Administrator Mac Burdette has said the utility franchise fee hike, which will increase the annual cost of electricity by an average of $48, was necessary to keep the town on sound financial footing. Otherwise, it could be forced to drain its $7 million savings account that serves as a financial safety net in the event of emergencies such as a hurricane, he said.

Reach Prentiss Findlay at 937-5711 or pfindlay@postandcourier.com.

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Comments

lexylady (anonymous) says...

If you put his brain in a bumble bee, the bee would fly backwards!! JMO

Town Council could care LESS about what the Public thinks.

October 9, 2008 at 7:46 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Slick50 (anonymous) says...

Otherwise, it could be forced to drain its $7 million savings account that serves as a financial safety net in the event of emergencies such as a hurricane, he said.

On the other hand, they have no problem with draining YOUR savings account...

Watch out surrounding counties. These ideas have a ripple effect that will ultimately impact all of us.

October 9, 2008 at 7:49 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

jsteph10 (anonymous) says...

'The side of the road that bridge walkers and runners use to park is an accident waiting to happen, he said. "We are lucky nothing has happened to date. It just takes one and we (the town) will be at fault," he said.'

"Patriots Point boulevard roadside parking for bridge walkers is dangerous, he said, and cars have been burglarized."

So, in an attempt to protect the citizens from hurting themselves, they want to close one parking area and charge you to use another. Seems strange.

October 9, 2008 at 9:45 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

grainofsalt (anonymous) says...

Wow. I thought I was one of the most cynical people out there about Town Council and am usually the last person to defend something they do. But clearly I'm just an amateur compared to some of the folks on this forum.

With all the other issues going on, THIS is where you draw some line in the sand? "I will NOT pay $1 to park!"

Christ.

Hey! Here's an idea. Why don't we ask the Town to issue town stickers for residents. They can put it in the next Stormwater bill. If you have one of those stickers, you park at the new park for free. If not, you pay. That way, all the visitors have to pay, but us MP taxpayers don't. Does that idea have any merit? Oh... wait. Then the town would have to pay to print the stickers and perhaps extra postage to mail them. The folk on this forum would have apoplexy at the mere thought. :-)

October 9, 2008 at 10:42 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

sailaway (anonymous) says...

Bustos wants to take a break from all this stuff for a while? Only a politician thinks that way, not a real person in the real world. That's the response of a child who wants to avoid punishment by promising never, ever to be bad again. It's too late. The town is already committed, and this Council committed us. And only other politicians would stand behind Bustos like a chorus, in agreement with what he said. Let's be honest. This isn't just about paying $1 and hour to park someplace. It's about a government that has overspent the taxpayer's money and now, only because of political heat, want to take a break for a while.

October 9, 2008 at 11:08 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

outrage (anonymous) says...

They have not even started with the other $6,000,000 park on Shem Creek.

Mac Burdette has to much power and needs to be replaced.

October 9, 2008 at 5:09 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

whome (anonymous) says...

"The town is paying for its $14 million park construction through tax increment financing, a method that borrows funds for improvements expected to increase property values, thereby generating more taxes to pay back the debt."
---------------------
Sheez, and didn't realize all it took was a $14M park to keep real estate prices from dropping.

October 9, 2008 at 7:08 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!

Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Thank you for your interest in this story. The comment thread for this article has been closed.



Most Popular

 

Sponsored Links