Brig copied Gitmo
Military officer warned of prisoner's failing mental state, documents show
By PAMELA HESS
WASHINGTON — A U.S. military officer warned Pentagon officials that an American detainee was being driven nearly insane by months of punishing isolation and sensory deprivation in the Charleston Naval Consolidated Brig, according to documents obtained by The Associated Press.
While the treatment of prisoners at detention facilities at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and in Afghanistan and Iraq have long been the subject of human rights complaints and court scrutiny, the documents shed new light on how two American citizens and a legal U.S. resident were treated in military jails inside the United States.
The Bush administration ordered the men to be held in military jails as "enemy combatants" for years of interrogations without criminal charges, which would not have been allowed in civilian jails.
The men were interrogated by the CIA and Defense Intelligence Agency, repeatedly denied access to attorneys, mail from home and contact with anyone other than guards and their interrogators. They were deprived of natural light for months and for years were forbidden even minor distractions such as a soccer ball or a dictionary.
"I will continue to do what I can to help this individual maintain his sanity, but in my opinion we're working with borrowed time," an unidentified Navy brig official wrote of prisoner Yaser Esam Hamdi in 2002. "I would like to have some form of an incentive program in place to reward him for his continued good behavior, but more so, to keep him from whacking out on me."
Hamdi, who was born in Louisiana and captured on a battlefield in Afghanistan after the 9/11 attacks, was held at the brig in Hanahan from 2002-2004.
Yale Law School's Lowenstein International Human Rights Clinic received the documents through a Freedom of Information Act request filed by attorneys Jonathan Freiman and Tahlia Townsend, who are representing another detainee, Jose Padilla. The Lowenstein group and the American Civil Liberties Union said the papers were evidence that the Bush administration violated the 5th Amendment's protections against cruel treatment. The U.S. military was ordered to treat the American prisoners the same way prisoners at Guantanamo were treated, according to the documents.
However, the Guantanamo jail was created by the Bush administration specifically to avoid allowing detainees any constitutional rights. Administration lawyers contended the Constitution did not apply outside the country.
"These documents are the first clear confirmation of what we've suspected all along, that the brig was run as a prison beyond the law. There was an effort to create a Gitmo inside the United States," Jonathan Hafetz of the ACLU's National Security Project said, using the slang word for the U.S. naval facility in Cuba.
The 91 pages of e-mails and documents produced by U.S. Fleet Forces Command, which runs the military brigs in Norfolk, Va., and Hanahan, detail daily decisions made about the treatment of Hamdi and Padilla, then both American citizens, and Ali Saleh Kahlah al-Marri, a legal resident. All were designated by the White House as "illegal enemy combatants."
The paperwork shows uniformed officials at the military brigs growing increasingly uncomfortable and then alarmed that they were being directed to handle their prisoners under the rules that governed Guantanamo.
The authors and recipients of the e-mails are censored from the documents. They appear to be going to either military or Pentagon legal counsel and policy offices.
The documents show that some officials at the Hanahan brig were deeply skeptical about the mandate that Guantanamo rules should apply in the United States, a decision made by the defense secretary's office, according to the documents.
"You have every right to question the 'lash-up' between GTMO and Charleston — it was the first thing I ask (sic) about a year ago when I checked on board," wrote one official to another in 2006. "In a nutshell, they gave the Charleston detainee mission to (Joint Forces Command) who promptly gave it to (Fleet Forces Command) with a 'lots of luck' and nothing else."
An officer was still raising alarms about Hamdi's mental state after 14 months of jail with no contact with lawyers, his family or even other prisoners.
"I told him the last thing that I wanted to have happen was to send him anywhere from here as a 'basket case,' of use to no one, to include himself," the officer wrote in an e-mail to undisclosed government officials in June 2003. "I fear the rubber band is nearing its breaking point here and not totally confident I can keep his head in the game much longer."
The frustrated officer wrote that he had "to have the ability to exercise some discretion when I believe it best for the health and welfare of those assigned to my facility ... Know ... we are to remain consistent with the procedures that were/are in place at Camp X-Ray" a reference to the Guantanamo jail. He pointed out that imposing those conditions in the brig had a far harsher effect on his prisoners because they had no contact with any other detainees, which was allowed at Guantanamo.
Scores of pages of once-secret legal opinions regarding detainee rights and treatment have been released under the Freedom of Information Act. At least two apparently crucial memos about enemy combatant treatment inside the U.S. have yet to be made public.
Hamdi was captured in Afghanistan in 2001, shipped to Guantanamo and then moved to the U.S. after his citizenship was discovered. He was held and interrogated for three years without charges. The Supreme Court in 2004 rejected the government's attempt to hold him indefinitely without charge. He was released to Saudi Arabia on the condition he give up his U.S. citizenship and not file any lawsuits against the United States.
Al-Marri, a citizen of Qatar, was a legal resident studying for a master's degree in Illinois when he was arrested in December 2001 by the FBI as a material witness to the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. He was charged with credit card fraud in 2002. A month before his trial in 2003, President Bush declared him an enemy combatant and al-Marri was transferred to the consolidated naval brig in Charleston. There he was held in isolation for 16 months, denied shoes and socks for two years, and was not allowed any contact with his family for five years. He remains in the military brig but is appealing his detention to the Supreme Court.
Padilla was arrested in 2002 under suspicion he was collaborating with al-Qaida to build a radioactive or "dirty" bomb. He was held as an enemy combatant for more than three years. He was held totally incommunicado for 21 months. His mother was only allowed to see Padilla after she agreed not to alert the media to the visit, according to the documents.
The government dropped the dirty bomb charges and Padilla's case was moved to civilian court, where in 2007 he was convicted of supporting terrorism in Kosovo, Bosnia and Chechnya.
Comments
WhoCares (anonymous) says...
So the local yokels think they know better how to treat terrorists than the CIA and DIA...what a surprise!! Perhaps someone should remind this "anonymous military officer" that it is her duty to shut up and follow orders!
October 8, 2008 at 6:07 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
grainofsalt (anonymous) says...
Spank, I'm with you on US citizens' rights to be presumed innocent until proven guilty.
But this guy was caught fighting AGAINST our troops in Afghanistan. It's not as if he were accused of robbing the liquor store down the street, but wasn't caught in the act. He was an enemy combatant caught on an enemy battledfield outside of our country. Under those circumstances, I don't care what his citizenship is. Nor should you.
October 8, 2008 at 8:33 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
512c (anonymous) says...
The scariest part to me is that the guards and the prison employees who are dehumanized (while dehumanizing) are running around near my friends and self.
Everyone knows that you can't keep the dark worms from creeping into your own head when you torture.
Many people forget to feel compassion for humans after taking their humanity away as a career.
This means we have more than just these prisoners and their justified hatred to worry about.
Another reason to be fair and humane even to your enemies.
October 8, 2008 at 8:59 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
grannyofseven_2 (anonymous) says...
Why don't we let them all go? That way when a bomb goes off in a mall where your family is shopping and is killed, you can feel sorry for them. Because they didn't know what they did was wrong they are innocents. Or they set of bombs in various schools. I for one don't care how long they are held. Or how they are held.
I don't want them to be mistreated (although they may deserve it) but if they are terrorists then go with it
October 8, 2008 at 9:44 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
WhoCares (anonymous) says...
I agree with those who think he should be granted his rights under the Constitution. Put him on trial as the Constitution requires...charge him with treason (which is what he did when he fought against his country)...if he is found guilty, execute him...which is the punishment that is REQUIRED under the Constitution. FYI, treason is the only crime in the Constitution which demands the death penalty.
So I say grant him his Constitutional rights...all of them!!!
October 8, 2008 at 10:15 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
SpiderJohn (anonymous) says...
How did I know that we would see the same cronies posting the same way?
Let's see....I made a bet....Rw - would say kill them. I WON! wpc would say kill them. I WON!
I must have ESP, oh no, its just the A typical idiot things that they would say!
SUR-PRIZE SUR-PRIZE!
October 8, 2008 at 10:33 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
cte (anonymous) says...
screw giving him rights! That guy was fighting against our military! He doesn't deserve anything. They should've just shot him and saved space.
October 8, 2008 at 11:19 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
poor_paul (anonymous) says...
In the Viet Nam war, our soldiers were enemy combatants to the VC, and when captured, they were subjected to unspeakable treatment and torture. We (at least I) felt this was wrong and against the Geneva Convention. Our soldiers were fighting for our side, theirs were fighting for their side, so each side has their perception on who is right and who is wrong.
How is our treatment of these enemy combatants any different than what happened in Viet Nam? I am not saying release these guys to continue to fight against us, but it is pretty scary to think that the government can hold people without any charges.
And no, I am not a liberal left winger...
October 8, 2008 at 11:48 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
ForPnC (anonymous) says...
Anyone concerned about the "rights" of these people are more than welcome to take them off the hands of the tax payers and keep them in their house.
October 8, 2008 at 6:01 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
southbel (anonymous) says...
There is some misconception that these terrorists are afforded the same rights as United States citizens, they are not. They are enemy combatants. They are under military law and under a completely different set of rules and procedures. Do not confuse this with our current set of rules and procedures that we utilize in the American court system. This is the problem many liberals have. These terrorists do not get these rights, period. Enemy combatants - that means enemies of the United States. Remember that. The ACLU needs to get out of the business of trying to protect enemies of the United States!
October 8, 2008 at 9:51 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!
Full terms and conditions can be read here.
Thank you for your interest in this story. The comment thread for this article has been closed.
- Most Commented
- Most Emailed
- Image questions for The Citadel
- Man killed, two others injured in Mt. Pleasant
- Sunning alligator nips trail walker
- New place to play planned for Folly
- German firm to open area factory
- New Church Spire
- Logistics company to add 500 jobs in Berkeley County in next five years
- Defying expectations
- Energy initiative to expand
- Protesters coming here



