Preventive mastectomies on the rise

The Post and Courier
Friday, October 3, 2008


Michelle Kelley plays with two of her three children, Ryhan (front) and Tyla, at her home in Summerville. She has cancer in one breast but will have a double mastectomy.

Alan Hawes
The Post and Courier

Michelle Kelley plays with two of her three children, Ryhan (front) and Tyla, at her home in Summerville. She has cancer in one breast but will have a double mastectomy.

Michelle Kelley scratched an itch near her right armpit and felt a marble-size lump. Within days, the 28-year-old was diagnosed with breast cancer.

Aggressive breast cancers are being diagnosed more frequently in young women, experts say. And more of those young women are making the bold decision to remove their healthy breast along with the diseased one in order to amputate their fear.

Kelley is eager to end this chapter of her life. During the past eight months, the tumor and two affected lymph nodes were removed, a course of chemotherapy made her hair fall out and, twice, she feared the cancer had spread. "I had a cyst in my right armpit. Then I thought I felt something on the left-hand side. I don't want to live like that. They're just boobs," she said.

Her surgery is scheduled for November. "For me, I'm going to live life for the next 60 years. It's too much stress and anxiety," the mother of three said. She will undergo reconstruction that will use tissue harvested from her own body.

More women in the United States are choosing to have both breasts removed when cancer has been found in one breast. Researchers reported a 150 percent increase between 1998 and 2003 for the procedure, called contralateral prophylactic mastectomy, in a study published last year in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Dr. Gretchen A. Meyer with Lowcountry Hematology and Oncology has seen an increase in patients opting for the measure. "Most of my patients that proceed with bilateral mastectomy tell me that they did not want to have to worry about further monitoring of the opposite breast," Meyer said.

Primarily younger women are opting for the preventive mastectomy, researchers found after studying the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.

As screening technology continues to improve, more premenopausal women will be diagnosed, experts say. The median age at diagnosis is 61, according to the database.

Studies have shown the preventative surgery reduces the risk of new cancer and improves survival for women who have a history of breast cancer and other risk factors. Removal does not eliminate risk of breast cancer, but greatly reduces it. If any breast tissue is left behind, a certain amount of risk will always linger.

A woman who has been diagnosed with breast cancer has a higher risk of developing breast cancer again. Out of 100 women who have a history of breast cancer, about 10 will get cancer on the other side within 10 years. Add on additional risk factors, such as genetic abnormality or family history, and the likelihood increases.

Kelley did not test positive for the gene associated with breast cancer. But her first cousin developed the disease, and since her mother and her aunt are identical twins, Kelley and her cousin are genetically half-sisters.

Dr. Walter "Bo" Blessing, a surgeon with Surgical Associates of Charleston, said that the recent trend is a change in course for breast cancer treatment. "For the past 20 years we have moved toward less invasive surgery with lumpectomy and radiation instead of total mastectomy," Blessing said. "However, in the last three to five years, with the advent of new reconstructive techniques and breast MRI, more women are choosing mastectomy."

Dr. Jennifer Cranny, radiologist and director of women's imaging for Imaging Specialists of Charleston in Mount Pleasant, said newer technology, such as digital mammography and MRI, is responsible for finding more cancers in younger women.

"We're finding 3 millimeter cancers," she said. "You wouldn't feel that for more than a year."

Tammy Dye, 45, of Goose Creek credits education with her decision to undergo a double mastectomy in September.

"A lot of the reason it's not scary is because of all the information available," Dye said.

Dye's cancer was discovered with digital mammography at Trident Medical Center in July. Two tumors, too small to feel, were detected.

Dye's 39-year-old sister was diagnosed with breast cancer the day after Dye learned of her disease. Her sister has chosen a different treatment course, Dye said

Removing both breasts is a serious surgery that could affect one's self-image and sex life. Whatever women decide, they seem confident in their decisions.

A 2006 study funded by the National Cancer Institute found that more than 86 percent of women were satisfied with removing their second, cancer-free breast and did not have doubts. About 76 percent of those women were content with their quality of life.

Similarly, of those who did not choose preventive surgery, 75 percent were content with their quality of life.

"You have to decide what's right for you," Dye said.

Reach Jill Coley at 937-5719 or jcoley@postandcourier.com.



Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version   Add this

Notice about comments:
The Post and Courier is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. The Post and Courier does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our Web site.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Comments

This article has  5 comment(s)

Posted by ForPnC on October 3, 2008 at 3:59 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I've known a few women that have had this done and you can see the lack of worry of stress in them. They're just so much happier.

It amazes me to look at the medical leaps and bounds in some areas of heath that have occurred in just the past decade while other areas seem to sit stagnant.

A 90 year old man can now have sex but women are still dying in large numbers.



Posted by RTC on October 3, 2008 at 8:34 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Several years ago I was sitting next to a couple of woman at jury duty who apparently were aquainted. One woman was telling the other that as soon as her daughter in law had her third child she was having a double mastectomy.
She went on to explain that the younger woman's grandmother, mother, and sister had all died of breast cancer. This woman had not had cancer yet, but she was in such fear of her life that she was opting to have her breasts removed prophylatically. I thought this was rather extreme, because she had not even had cancer.
Later, thinking more about it, I could understand this woman's fear.
There has got to be a very good reason for this significant rise in breast cancer and hopefully they will discover exactly what is causing it.



Posted by wjhamilton3 on October 3, 2008 at 9:55 a.m. (Suggest removal)

The obvious question is what in our food, environment, water or medicine is causing a rise in the incidence of these cancers to increase? A lot of diseases are more common merely because people are living longer, but an increase in cancer among young women isn't explained by that.

The US has far more chemicals and genetically engineered foods in its diet than Europe and many other parts of the world. It's unlikely anyone is really regulating or checking any longer since we're devoted to self regulation and the free market. When we've had diplomatic house guests from Europe (we used to work with the local World Trade center and host trade delegation members in our home) they were horrified at the coast and scarcity of organic and natural foods here.

My wife has our family on mostly organic foods now. The wter if filtered. She and my son are taking supplements. She swears it's important and will make a difference.

Thankfully BI-LO has pumped up its organics, so we're not going broke at Whole Foods.



Posted by iceman1978 on October 3, 2008 at 10:30 a.m. (Suggest removal)

wjhamilton, Excellent point. I am strongly convinced that breast cancer is tied to the growth hormones and steroids that are put into livestock. Who knows what else is being put into the foods people eat?

Turkish food was always very healthy. Even though most people in Turkey smoked, they at least ate healthy. Almost all of the food produced there was done organically. I'm convinced that one of the reasons I never developed acne was because I was living there during my adolecence and ate a healthier diet.

There are some fast food places here that are good, but not many. Panera Bread has good food, as does Atlanta Bread. I also like the salads at Zaxby's, but other than that I don't eat fast food at all.
----

ForPnC, I am so disgusted by that. Who knows how many millions, or perhaps billions, were spent to develop Viagra so that men could have the illusion they are still young by having the sex drive of a 20 year-old and the body of a 70 year-old.

That money should have been put into research on breast cancer research for women and prostate cancer research for men.



Posted by BILLYBOB on October 3, 2008 at 10:51 a.m. (Suggest removal)

YOU GOTTA SAVE ONE