Connect with us:   Subscribe to the paper  |   View the mobile edition  |   Get daily e-mail news  |   Get mobile alerts  |   Share your photos  |   Report news  |   Place an ad  |   Contact us


Test score goals rise beyond students' reach

The Post and Courier
Wednesday, October 1, 2008


For more info

See school scores

Increasingly tougher federal standards meant that four out of five South Carolina elementary and middle schools fell short of their goals, according to state results released Wednesday.

The requirements for elementary and middle schools jumped by more than 50 percent this year. For example, elementary and middle schools in which 38.2 percent of students scored proficient in English last year met Adequate Yearly Progress, but this year, those same schools wouldn't meet the target unless 58.8 percent of their students scored proficient.

Fewer schools statewide met their federal goals, and the same was true in the Lowcountry.

High-poverty schools that fail to make the annual goals face consequences such as extra tutoring for students or the opportunity for students to transfer to higher performing schools. Districts that don't meet Adequate Yearly Progress after multiple years must set aside 10 percent of their federal Title 1 money for teacher training and develop a district improvement plan.

The Palmetto State's standards for Adequate Yearly Progress rise incrementally to meet the federal law's mandate that all students — regardless of their income, ability to speak English or learning disability — score proficient on math and English tests by 2014. Each state sets its own goal for proficiency, and in South Carolina, scores on the Palmetto Achievement Challenge Test are used to determine ratings for elementary and middle schools.







Latest local stories





Sponsored Links


Notice about comments:
Charleston.net is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Charleston.net does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not charleston.net. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Comments

This article has  1 comment(s)

Posted by desspec on October 1, 2008 at 1:07 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Never mind that a student has a learning disability or cannot speak English; he or she is expected to do better or the TEACHER needs extra training? Follow the money trail; they'll "somehow" attain their goal.....




(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Search Charleston.Net Archives for Latest News


Charleston.Net Customer Care | Subscribe to Paper, Register for email news updates, manage your online account, place a classified ad, or contact us




Charleston.net logo

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 the Evening Post Publishing Co.

Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of service, Privacy policy and our Parental consent form. (Updated 2/9/2007)