S.C. oyster industry using new ideas

BY BO PETERSEN // The Post and Courier
Friday, November 28, 2008



photo

The Post and Courier

Local oyster harvester Carl Dipace loads into his boat a pole of young oysters he plans to break apart and replant on the bank of the Edisto River.

Oysterman Carl DiPace spent this week out in the cold wash on the reefs, pulling in cluster after cluster — nothing says Thanksgiving in the Lowcountry like that salty slurp of meat.

But more and more, DiPace finds himself setting and harvesting single oysters instead of clusters. He's begun a business planting oyster reefs alongside waterfront homes as an alternative to riprap or a sea wall. Somewhere in that pluff mud he has his hands on the future.

While other regions along the East Coast and across the world struggle to restore oyster beds lost to development pollution, disease or salinity changes, the South Carolina coast has kept a hold on the resource and is on the leading edge of new approaches and techniques.

That was the prevailing lesson at the 11th International Conference on Shellfish Restoration hosted by the South Carolina Sea Grant Consortium here earlier in November.

But at the same time, coastal development is causing more pollution problems. Funding cuts in the nosediving economy have hamstrung staffs and programs in the public agencies that manage development and coastal waters.

"We're very fortunate. We have the luxury of saying we're trying to protect the resource that's here," said Karen Burnett, an associate professor of biology at the College of Charleston, who attended the conference. "I think we're doing the right things. I'm concerned about being able to continue."

DiPace, 52, is a longtime shellfish and oyster harvester who lives in Adams Run. He began cultivating single oysters for two reasons: the check and his back. The singles compete with Gulf and New England bivalves that are sold as delicacies.

"As I get older and my back hurts more, it's the old adage: work smarter not harder. There's a huge market for singles. Instead of picking 15 bushels of clusters I can pick three baskets of singles and make just as much money," he said.

Singles are harder to grow and are picky about spots, and have to be constantly hosed down to keep other oyster spat from grabbing hold.

And the job itself is getting tougher. Oyster beds up and down the coast are being shut down more often after rains because of pollution from storm water runoff. Fewer oystering license are sold anymore.

"As we continue to develop, the coast beds are being closed, beds choke up and die," DiPace said. That's where the business planting homeowner oyster reefs comes in, a way to avert a shoreline structure that would take away from water quality and use the water-filtering bivalves to stop some pollution at the subdivision source.

"It's a whole lot cheaper than a sea wall. They'll have oysters. They'll have live habitat for fish, crab and shrimp and it will be erosions control," DiPace said.

Water quality is "the big 'but,' " said Mel Bell, S.C. Department of Natural Resources fisheries management director. "Of all the fisheries, the one where we have really good potential to expand is shellfish. But we've got to be really careful about our water quality."

The oyster harvest so far has stayed relatively consistent year to year at about 80,000-90,000 bushels, said Bill Anderson, DNR shellfish program manager. More oysterman are cultivating singles; the wild harvest has gone from 100 to 600 bushels in four years. Buyers are looking for them.

"It's the same salty taste (as wild clusters)," Anderson said. "The singles we produce are in higher demand."

DNR programs such as volunteer urban re-planting of oyster beds have been stopped this year by budget cuts. The loss of that kind of hands-on experience for the public is alarming to Burnett, the biology professor. It might be the key to protecting the resource.

"People are going to care a lot more (about water quality) if they're growing their own food under their own dock," she said.

Reach Bo Petersen at bpetersen@postandcourier.com or 745-5852.

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Comments

Neponset (anonymous) says...

Sounds like a good idea to me. I prefer the taste of our local oysters - gulf oysters don't do it for me. The only problem with our oysters is appearance, and cultivating them as singles would solve that and make them more desirable for our oyster bars, such as Shem Creek B&G where I go on occasion.

November 28, 2008 at 7:11 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Horratio (anonymous) says...

Water quality is really the issue.

Unless joe public becomes religious about it we will have trouble holding on to what we have.

When the average lowcountry bubba thinks nothing of letting the trash fly out the back of his pickup truck , do we really expect they will pick up their dogs poop from their yard? (major source of non source water pollution).

When the yuppie suburbanite gets that new fishing boat that goes 55 mph, do you think he will slow to no wake in our inland creeks (major sorce of bank erosion and subsequent loss of shell habitiat)?

I wish I could see it.

Saying we want clean water is easy. Being willing to live like we mean it is hard. People dont want to understand what it takes because its too inconvienient.

November 28, 2008 at 8:17 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Grinder (anonymous) says...

This is where government's priorities should be questioned. Instead of funding every other yabba dabba do-dah artisitic/historic/ethnic event, or spending $1 million-plus to build and rig a reproduction tall ship with no plans to ever sail her, or any other foolish waste of taxpayer monies, maybe our governing bodies might consider giving agencies such as DNR a better budget so it can do the work it was designed to do, including the enhancement of marine resources. I was told years ago ago by someone with DNR that its budget was so poor its rainbows were black and white. I don't think the folks at DNR even have a rainbow anymore. DNR has good leadership at the top now, and should be adequately funded throughout. The effort noted in the story is typical of where our mindset should be - The Future!!

November 28, 2008 at 9:33 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!

Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Thank you for your interest in this story. The comment thread for this article has been closed.


Hot Topics

 



.Link.