Brown wants to block bringing detainees to brig

The Post and Courier
Wednesday, November 19, 2008


U.S. Rep. Henry Brown introduced legislation today prohibiting the use of government funds to transport any terror detainees to the Navy Brig in Hanahan from their current holding site at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

President-elect Barack Obama is looking at ways to shut down the operation at Guantanamo Bay and bring prosecutions to the U.S. If that happens, one potential holding site is the brig at the Charleston Naval Weapons Station. About 255 detainees are held at Guantanamo.

Brown's legislation has an uphill climb at becoming a reality but Brown's camp says they want to get the debate going on alternatives.

Two safer locations, Brown suggested, is the federal "supermax" prison in the high desert of Colorado, or the maximum security military prison at Ft. Leavenworth, Kan. Both are "better equipped to securely and separately hold hundreds of individuals with ties to terrorists, from civilians," he said.

Brown, a Republican, called any decision to consider the Charleston area "a horrible mistake."

"While it is located on a military base, the brig is also less than a mile away from a highly populated civilian area," Brown said. "Bringing these extremely dangerous war criminals, deemed to high a threat to be sent home, would add an unnecessary terrorist threat to our community."

He cited the local population centers, the Port of Charleston, Interstate 526 and the Navy Nuclear Power Training Command as some of the risks.

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Comments

Smart_Enough_2_Know_Better (anonymous) says...

Wouldn't having them here actually make us safer? Wouldn't terrorists avoid hitting the area to keep their "brothers-in-arms" safe?

Are we afraid they would get out? The US Naval Consolidation Brig isn't some Podunk minimum security prison sitting out in the middle of civilian neighborhood. It is one of the most highly secured- and accredited- correctional facilities in the world, located within the confines of a secure military base. Ahmed won't be playing golf or working the nearby fields while serving his time- he'll be under lock and key the ENTIRE time.

Worst case scenario- someone tries to escape and gets shot. Military confinement just isn't the same- the folks behind the gates aren't bound by the same rules as their civilian guard counterparts.

I'm not saying it's ideal, but I am saying we (Henry Brown) should be worrying about more important issues. Like, say, creating wealth and jobs in this state...

November 19, 2008 at 7:52 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!

Full terms and conditions can be read here.




.Link.