Meetings set on schools' futures

By Diette Courrégé
The Post and Courier
Sunday, November 16, 2008



If you go

The dates and sites of the School Board meetings are:

--Dec. 10 in the Lincoln High School cafeteria.

--Dec. 11 in Burns Elementary School auditorium.

--Dec. 15 in the St. John's High School auditorium.

--Dec. 16 in the Burke High School auditorium.

--Dec. 17 in the Baptist Hill High School cafeteria.

All meetings are 6:30- 8 p.m.

Charleston County school officials released on Friday a schedule for five community meetings to gather feedback on plans to restructure and close schools.

Officials plan to present their restructuring proposal to the school board at its Dec. 8 meeting at 5:15 p.m. at 75 Calhoun St., and then they will seek the community's input.

The school board asked the superintendent earlier this year to come up with recommendations to save money through restructuring or closing schools. After receiving community feedback, the board approved 12 criteria covering areas such as educational quality, demographics and building conditions that will be used to rank schools for potential changes. District staff are creating that list of schools and the estimated cost savings.

The forums will begin at 6:30 p.m. and last until 8 p.m. The dates and sites of the meetings are: Dec. 10 in the Lincoln High School cafeteria; Dec. 11 in Burns Elementary School auditorium; Dec. 15 in the St. John's High School auditorium; Dec. 16 in the Burke High School auditorium; Dec. 17 in the Baptist Hill High School cafeteria.

Noticeably absent from the list of constituent districts to hold meetings were the Mount Pleasant, West Ashley and James Island communities. Elliot Smalley, the district's executive director of communications, said the district wasn't "anticipating making significant options proposals in these areas at this time. However, school redesign discussions have included possible interest in modifying attendance boundaries in these areas; if we propose these changes, we'll follow protocol and work through our constituent boards."

The meetings will be led by Sue Robertson, an education planner who led the meetings about future high school options for Mount Pleasant. All comments will be recorded, shared publicly and brought back to the board in January.

Reach Diette Courrégé at 937-5546 or dcourrege@postandcourier.com.

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Add this

Comments

karmann (anonymous) says...

How many folks feel that the decision is already made, that this is just an exercise in futility. How come the Post and Courier isn't doing some sort of investigation into the lack of academics for all kids, using APEX to give give kids a "redo" on their grades so they can even though they don't attend those classes, and other such abuses by CCSD.

November 16, 2008 at 7:34 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

mlm (anonymous) says...

We are being told these are to be one-time only meetings, limited to an hour and a half to discuss multiple schools in each area. Just how much of the 90 minutes will be taken up by the official presentation in support of the administration's recommendations?

The proposal goes to the board on December 8. The first public hearing for the McCellanville part of the plan is be held 2 days later. The last is for the St. Paul's area 9 days after the plan is made public. When will the public get to see the facts in support of the recommendations? Just how much data will the board see that the public won't?

Then they tell us that 3 large suburban constituent districts are not included in this process because their areas will not be affected. Are they trying to tell us the overcrowded schools in the Mt. Pleasant, West Ashley and James Island constituent districts aren't related to the failing and poorly managed schools in the other 5 areas?

Come on, get real. This is a railroad job. The mere holding of these meetings will be used to justify the decisions of a 9 member board whose majority and new chair are known for ignoring public comments and parental concerns. The entire process has been motivated by administrators with an eye on short term special interests and who are much less interested in good management practices over the long term.

November 16, 2008 at 9:37 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Read our full Terms and Conditions.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!

Thank you for your interest in this story. The comment thread for this article has been closed.


 

Most Popular

 

Sponsored Links