New take-home car policy parked

The Post and Courier
Wednesday, November 12, 2008


MONCKS CORNER — Berkeley County Council has tapped the brakes on a plan to vastly reduce the number of take-home cars driven by non-law enforcement employees.

The council on Monday night declined to take action on a proposed policy restricting who gets to drive a take-home car. Councilmen said they still support cutting vehicle costs but want more information about how it would impact customer service and employee compensation packages.

"I know there's some fat that needs to be trimmed," Councilman Jack Schurlknight said. "I just want to make sure we're doing the right thing, not only for the employees but the taxpayers."

A staff report distributed at the council meeting says the number of current take-home cars is 77. It says 26 elected officials and on-call employees would continue to take the cars home under the criteria in the proposed policy. Another 26 would not qualify, although the report says it would be more operationally efficient to allow them. The remaining 25 cars would be used by employees once they're at work.

Five of the employees were promised cars as part of their compensation package, the report says.

Councilmen said 77 was obviously too many but they weren't sure where to start cutting. They agreed to table the issue for a month to give staff time to answer questions about what effects the cuts would have.

As of this summer, the county had as many as 95 take-home cars, more than North Charleston and Dorchester County combined. It was also more than the city of Charleston, though that number does not include the 63 take-home vehicles used by Charleston Water System.

Unlike most of its neighbors, Berkeley County does not require employees to pay a fee or reimburse the county if they travel long distances to work.

Berkeley County officials said they have received numerous complaints from the public about employees driving around the county with their families or eating inside their parked cars with the engine and air conditioning running.

Councilmen have noted that many employees with take-home cars don't live in the county. Some drive back and forth to Moncks Corner every day from as far as West Ashley and St. George.

Supervisor Dan Davis said that the current policy was put in place in 1995 and updated in December 2005, one month before he took office. "There are less cars assigned for take-home today than when I came into office," he said.

Reach Andy Paras at 745-5891 or aparas@postandcourier.com.

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Comments

Slick50 (anonymous) says...

Gutless wonders...

The right thing would be to stop having taxpayers foot the bill for a few chosen employees. As the economy turns south, those employees should be thankful they have a steady income, NOT a privately funded vehicle. Almost every morning I see a MPFD vehicle heading to Mt. Pleasant from Summerville. Is that in the best interest of taxpayers?

November 12, 2008 at 4:33 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

oldglory (anonymous) says...

I would like to know what positions on-call employees hold? An elected official needs to take home a car? Why? So these officials can show off? Compensation package? Why does a salaried employee need a compensation package? Oh, maybe the compensation packages are for elected officials?

Well, I vote against all these 'freebies', because this is one of the ways this country has brought itself down. These types of 'windfalls' are to massage egos of those on power trips. Quit whining, people, and be grateful you have a paycheck--most people don't have one. The economic situation is a crisis that is going to take years of struggle to turn around. Let's begin on the path that will make for a good recovery.

It's time to get real. It's time to begin figuring out how South Carolina citizens will survive in the job market. It's time jobs are created for people who want to work hard and take home just a regular salary, no perks, no compensations.

November 12, 2008 at 8:31 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

sig (anonymous) says...

Just amazing. If they live outside the town limits they should not have a car, except for a few. The coroner and a few others that may actually get called out more than once a week.

The county needs to also ensure that this is not abused. Too many are using the car as their family car to go shopping, etc.

I agree with Slick50. Gutless wonders. A little political pressure by Davis and friends and you back off. Taxpayers should not be paying 77 cars. 26 maybe.

November 12, 2008 at 12:56 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Tides (anonymous) says...

Do a good probing of the public defenders office.

November 12, 2008 at 4:50 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!

Full terms and conditions can be read here.




.Link.