Jury awards Richard C. Davis $4 million in "Flip This House" lawsuit against A&E
By Allyson Bird
A federal jury in Charleston awarded real estate investor Richard C. Davis more than $4 million in damages today in a trial stemming from the "Flip This House" reality television series.
Davis sued cable network A&E, saying he had an oral agreement with A&E to split revenues from the program he created. Davis, of James Island-based Trademark Properties Inc., said he was never paid.
A&E disputed that any agreement existed. Its lawyers declined to provide immediate comment on the ruling, which came after more than five hours of deliberation.
"I'm very pleased with the verdict," said Mount Pleasant attorney Frank M. Cisa, who represented Davis. "These cases are very tough to prove."
For more details, see Thursday's Post and Courier.
Comments
mrjm (anonymous) says...
Congratulations, Trademark!!!! It WAS a good show for A&E, and it is a good show on TLC. A&E didn't know a good thing when they had it. You guys deserve every penny! Now - put Dawn on the air more often; she's cute!!
November 12, 2008 at 5:06 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
horseshoe (anonymous) says...
don't get too excited, this will surely be appealed and most likely overturned. an oral contract?? please.
November 12, 2008 at 5:47 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
chucktonian (anonymous) says...
Oral contract or not, it is not reasonable to expect somebody to work for free and earn millions for a TV network with no compensation. Good for Davis.
November 12, 2008 at 6:55 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
mrjm (anonymous) says...
Hey, A&E -
"What the heck; write a check!!!"
November 12, 2008 at 11:22 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
southbel (anonymous) says...
In business law, an oral contract is just as binding as a written contract, but there's the proving of an oral contract. That's the rub. Although, I too would be inclined to say that it would be highly unusual for anyone to agree to do this series without any type of financial compensation. Thus, the possibility of an oral contract would seem highly likely in this case. I think A&E really dropped the ball on this one.
November 12, 2008 at 11:44 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
ontheroad (anonymous) says...
Congrats to you Richard, you deserved to be compensated for what you created and they have been using. Now hopefully that this is over, we will see some new shows on TLC
November 13, 2008 at 5:23 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!
Full terms and conditions can be read here.
Thank you for your interest in this story. The comment thread for this article has been closed.
- Most Commented
- Most Emailed
- S.C. losing port traffic to other states
- Out with old ...
- Water — 'The smell is gone'
- Cart gives Buddy new lease on life
- Schools plan to update visitor-security system
- Tough times have taught comedian's sister to love life
- GenPhar site 'red-tagged'
- Off campus
- Historic manor house used by Girl Scouts is among buildings that might be torn down to make way for future
- Man, 17, killed in motorcycle wreck
