Attorney: A&E owes $7.5M

Jury deliberation to continue Wednesday

By Allyson Bird
The Post and Courier
Tuesday, November 11, 2008



In closing arguments before a federal jury, attorney Frank Cisa said cable television network A&E owes his client, local real estate investor Richard C. Davis, more than $7.5 million in a profit-sharing arrangement attached to the reality show "Flip This House."

"He had the pilot (episode) in one hand. He had the Writers Guild registration in the other hand. And they never asked Richard Davis what he wanted for his show?" Cisa said in closing arguments. "They knew he spent $85,000 on the pilot and never asked what he wanted for his show? ... I submit to you that's not credible."

The multimillion dollar figure includes three seasons of "Flip This House," even though only the first season chronicled Davis' James Island company, Trademark Properties Inc. Cisa said that's because Davis created the show about buying and selling real estate and was "ready, willing and able" to continue with the program if compensated.

A&E's New York-based attorney, Jeremy Feigelson, began his closing remarks the same way the network's local defense attorney, Richard Farrier, began his opening arguments. "No way," Feigelson said.

He suggested that Davis and Charles Norlander, the A&E representative with whom Davis claims to have made the verbal deal, were "ships in the night" that never quite reached the same point.

"Can you picture a conversation where Mr. Davis talked on and on, maybe talked at Charles ... and he persuaded himself he's come away with an agreement?" Feigelson said.

He told the jury that Davis never shared with them any specifics from the conversation with A&E that allegedly hatched the deal.

"We saw him grope and struggle and fail to answer the most important question of all: What did A&E say to you?" Feigelson said.

Before concluding, Feigelson said the jury, in order to rule in favor of Davis, would have to believe that A&E changed its business model to cut a deal with him and that every witness had lied under oath during the trial.

The jury began deliberations late Monday afternoon and will resume Wednesday morning.

Prior to closing arguments, Monday marked the first time in the weeklong trial in which A&E employees acknowledged any mention of a potential 50-50 profit-splitting arrangement prior to the lawsuit.

Cisa produced a copy of an e-mail between Davis and the network with the term "50 percent" handwritten in the margin. But A&E representative Melinda McLaughlin testified she made that note only as the amount Davis proposed he receive on advertising revenue he helped bring for the show, not as an agreed-upon amount.

"I let him know that it would be single digits so he wouldn't be surprised to see the final (figure)," McLaughlin said.

Below where she marked Davis' 50 percent suggestion, McLaughlin also made a note to herself: "No way!"

Reach Allyson Bird at 937-5594 or abird@postandcourier.com.

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Comments

chucktonian (anonymous) says...

A&E needs to be cracked good here...even if the 50% isn't the deal, why on Earth were they producing a show without an agreement in writing? Are you kidding me? If I were the jury I would find in Davis' favor just for their lousy way of doing business. Even if you work at McDonald's, you have an employment agreement

November 11, 2008 at 6:03 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

IHATEINBEV (anonymous) says...

HAVE YOU EVER SEEN THE SHOW? HE HAS AN AROGENT ASS WHO MADE MONEY HYPING THE MAIN CAUSE OF OUR PROBLEMS NOW. HE KNEW WHAT HE WAS DOING. A VERBAL AGREEMENT? ARE YOU KIDDING. HE IS A REAL ESTATE AGENT. HAVE YOU EVER BOUGHT A HOUSE IN CHARLESTON WITH A HANDSHAKE? HE DEALS WITH CONTRACTS EVERYDAY. WELL AT LEAST USED TO.

November 11, 2008 at 8:03 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

tallblonde (anonymous) says...

"$7.5 MILLION" ?????
Richard has the potential of becoming VERY attractive.....
:)

November 11, 2008 at 9:46 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

mrjm (anonymous) says...

He created, wrote, starred in the show, and he is supposed to come out with nothing but advertising? That makes no sense...sounds like the big A&E is being very greedy here. I think this jury should show these hotshots that they can't do this to a good, lowcountry boy. So maybe he is arrogant, but how many people do you know in Charleston has the b*lls to create something like this and have it aired on a national network? I say give him the $7.5 mil; he deserves it.

November 11, 2008 at 10:13 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

blaze (anonymous) says...

A real estate broker didn't nail down an agreement in writing?
In the immortal words of Pete Hogwallop:

"That don't make no sense".

November 11, 2008 at 10:57 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

fsufan (anonymous) says...

In the first season credits of FTH it shows Davis as the creator of the series. That would be all for me as a juror in this case to cast doubt on anything A&E said. Buy the way the A&E rep no longer works there. What gives. I hope it goes to Davis.

November 11, 2008 at 12:05 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!

Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Thank you for your interest in this story. The comment thread for this article has been closed.



Most Popular

 

Sponsored Links