Charleston Memorial Hospital to be closed

By Jill Coley
The Post and Courier
Tuesday, November 4, 2008



When the Charleston County Hospital opened in 1965, the facility boasted an intercom system and air conditioning. The top price per day for a private room was $22.

photo

The Post and Courier

Operations at Charleston Memorial Hospital will be absorbed into other Medical University of South Carolina facilities nearby.

Now, the hospital known as Charleston Memorial will close its doors during the next few months.

It is an aging building, and the hospital's in-patient beds have dwindled from about 100 more than 40 years ago to the current 20-bed transitional unit for patients awaiting placement in long-term care facilities.

Medical University of South Carolina President Ray Greenberg said, "It's an old facility. It's expensive to maintain. It really can't house contempo-

-rary health care without significant changes to it."

Medical University Hospital Medical Director Patrick Cawley announced Monday that Charleston Memorial's emergency department, which treats about 12,000 people per year, will be absorbed by the main university hospital, and other clinical functions will move to Ashley River Tower.

Most of the 116 affected employees will be reassigned, but 14 positions will be terminated, he said. The changes will occur during the next two to three months.

"The plan has always been to reduce services of Charleston Memorial Hospital after opening Ashley River Tower," Cawley said. The new hospital opened in February.

Greenberg said that while the budget did not drive the decision, it does have implications. A modest amount of money, between $1 million and $2 million, will be saved, he said.

The Legislature recently cut the state budget, eliminating more than $14 million in state-appropriated funds for MUSC.

Greenberg issued an open letter to MUSC employees on Monday stating that a comprehensive plan for dealing with the cuts is expected by mid-November. The letter states that officials will first turn to limiting hiring, using non-state sources for salaries and decreasing outside personnel before implementing leaves of pay, "or the approach of last resort — layoffs."

Charleston Memorial is part of the Medical University Hospital Authority, which does not receive state-appropriated funds but is feeling the pinch of budget cuts through reduced Medicaid reimbursement and low patient census.

The hospital building will be used as office space, for partial hospitalization of psychiatric patients and one or two clinics, Cawley said.

The hospital first opened in 1953 as the Charleston County Tuberculosis Hospital, later becoming Pinehaven Tuberculosis Hospital.

In 1965, the hospital was expanded and repurposed into a county hospital providing indigent care. Greenberg said, "Historically, uninsured and underinsured often went there," he said.

But a 1986 federal law leveled indigent care among all hospitals that participate in Medicare, making it illegal for patients to be denied emergency care based on ability to pay.

The Medical University of South Carolina bought Charleston Memorial from Charleston County eight years ago. For more than a decade prior to the sale, the county paid MUSC to run the hospital.

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Add this

Comments

lillycollette (anonymous) says...

*

November 4, 2008 at 4:02 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

rusted1 (anonymous) says...

The wait time for Emergency Care at MUSC just got longer!

November 4, 2008 at 8:18 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Riptide (anonymous) says...

$22 per day doesn't seem to bad. In 1965 I was making the minimum wage of 1.25/hr and at that rate it would take me 17.6 hours to pay for one night in the hospital. Does that price include a good looking nurse and doctor?

November 4, 2008 at 10:06 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

eyfigueroa (anonymous) says...

Many years ago I remember using Charleston Memorial when they had a 'Children's Emergency Room'. The staff was wonderful, professional and in spite of it being known as a Paupers Hospital I actually recommended it to my family and friends if they need Pediatric Emergency Care.

But if the need isn't there, then the building should be either repurposed or torn down. That would be the only fiscally responsible thing to do.

November 4, 2008 at 10:47 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Phossil40 (anonymous) says...

During the past 6 months my wife has had occasion to use the facilities of the emergency rooms of Trident, Roper, and MUSC. The treatment at both Trident and Roper was excecellent in terms of efficientcy, relative speed, and care and concern of all personnel there. However, the experience at MUSC was nothing short of disaster. After 11 hours of indifference, a non-caring attitude, and a failure of the doctors involved to even address all the concerns. I watched as the nurse applied a bandage to one of her wounds and was astounded at her complete lack of competency (I could have done a better job as disabled as I am myself). It stayed on less than 30 minutes before another nurse had to redo it correctly.
I requested that she be transferred to Trident (even if I had to pay for it myself instead of Medicare and her supplemental insurance) to Trident. MUSC then reluctently admitted her where she stayed for four days. I will admit that the ER waiting room was full when we arrived but rrelatively empty after four hours. And now they want to put an additional buren on MUSC who needs to clean up their act? I find it interesting that my wife receive a patient satisfaction surey from both Trident and Roper but none from MUSC. Enough said.

November 4, 2008 at 1:47 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Read our full Terms and Conditions.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!

Thank you for your interest in this story. The comment thread for this article has been closed.


 

Most Popular

 

Sponsored Links