Connect with us:   Subscribe to the paper  |   View the mobile edition  |   Get daily e-mail news  |   Get mobile alerts  |   Share your photos  |   Report news  |   Place an ad  |   Contact us


High court upholds gun law

Ruling backs legislation passed in April to lower age limit

The Post and Courier
Tuesday, May 20, 2008


Young adults between the ages of 18 and 20 can legally possess handguns, the S.C. Supreme Court said Monday, marking a second victory for gun advocates recently.

In a unanimous decision stemming from an Upstate murder case, the court said the state's handgun ban for people under 21 is unconstitutional.

The ruling is in line with legislation already passed by lawmakers in Columbia giving residents in the 18- to 20-year-old range the right to legally possess handguns.

Gov. Mark Sanford signed the bill in April.

Monday's decision covered the York County case of Berry Scott Bolin, who was 19 when he was indicted for murder, assault and battery with intent to kill, possession of a firearm during commission of a violent offense, assault with intent to kill, discharging a firearm into an occupied vehicle, and illegal possession of a pistol by a person under 21.

Bolin argued the possession of a pistol indictment should be quashed because he had a right to bear arms as an adult over 18. He also said the ban violated the state's constitution because 18- to 20-year-olds were being treated differently than adults 21 and older.

In Monday's decision, the justices upheld a lower court ruling in Bolin's favor by using the state's constitutional ban on alcohol sales as a comparison.

"By expressly allowing the regulation of the sale of alcoholic beverages to the 18- to 20-year-old age group, and not stating any other situation in which the General Assembly may restrict the rights of this age group, the state constitution precludes the General Assembly from prohibiting this age group's possession of handguns," the ruling said.

Monday's decision potentially covers any young person whose criminal gun charge has yet to go through the court system, said Bolin's attorney, Leland Greely, because pending criminal cases were excluded from the Statehouse's law change.

S.C. Attorney General Henry McMaster said the decision probably wouldn't have a huge effect on state prosecutions because underage carrying charges usually get detected in the course of other criminal charges against an individual.

South Carolina is one of 18 states, and the only one in the South, that had set 21 as the age for handgun ownership, according to published reports quoting the National Rifle Association. Wyoming has no handgun age requirement; in Montana, it's set at 14; in Vermont, 16, according to the NRA.

There is no age requirement in South Carolina to own a rifle or shotgun.

Reach Schuyler Kropf at skropf@postandcourier.com or 937-5551.




Article tools




Latest local stories




Sponsored Links


Notice about comments:
Charleston.net is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Charleston.net does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not charleston.net. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Comments

This article has  4 comment(s)

Posted by Early on May 20, 2008 at 8:43 a.m. (Suggest removal)

You know, it's time for the supreme court to identify the meaning of adult!!! 17 in the military but 21 to drink. 18 to posses a pistol but can be convicted as a juvenile, 15 to drive a car, 16 to work. WTF



Posted by CHRISJIII on May 20, 2008 at 1:04 p.m. (Suggest removal)

So does this mean that 18 year olds can now drink alcohol legally? This state is so backwards!!!



Posted by Early on May 20, 2008 at 1:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)

CHRISJIII, my thoughts are if a man or woman is old enough to put their life on the line for this country in the military, they should be able to have a beer or glass of wine. Maybe refrain from hard liquor till a later age.
makes no sense to me either.



Posted by bkeelin on May 20, 2008 at 2:47 p.m. (Suggest removal)

How can it be a big mistake for adults to be allowed the freedom to excercise their constitutional right to bare arms? Those who use guns illegally will still do it whether there is a law against it or not. Those who are law abiding citizens will now have the freedom to excercise their 2nd amendment right to keep and bare arms. Why is it a mistake to allow them the freedom that the constitution grants them?

People use the same lame argument to fight for more gun control laws. The criminals will still use guns and even more so when you take them out of the hands of their potential victims. We need to stop trying to take away the freedoms and liberties of law abiding citizens and start taking away the freedoms and liberties of the criminals who violate the laws.

We need Sherriff JOE.




(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Search Charleston.Net Archives for Latest News


Charleston.Net Customer Care | Subscribe to Paper, Register for email news updates, manage your online account, place a classified ad, or contact us




Charleston.net logo

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 the Evening Post Publishing Co.

Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of service, Privacy policy and our Parental consent form. (Updated 2/9/2007)