Don't miss last real chance to pass immigration reform
The Legislature's most emotionally charged issue became even more volatile this past week as Gov. Mark Sanford and Senate President Pro Tempore Glenn McConnell clashed sharply over the Senate's latest effort to salvage the immigration reform bill. With the clock ticking down toward the end of the session, this revamped bill on its way back to the House is far better than no new law at all.
Unfortunately, abject failure on immigration reform is very much in the offing if the House and Senate can't come to terms on the issue within the next few weeks. Realists recognize that an immigration reform bill still in the House-Senate conference committee is irrevocably stalled there on a complicated technicality. That's why reformers in the Senate revived and amended a House immigration bill, which then became the object of a filibuster by Senate Minority Leader John Land.
Two leading Senate reformers — Sen. McConnell and Sen. Chip Campsen — and the governor are in agreement that the fatal flaw in the bill that went to the conference committee was the inclusion of an employee verification option known as the federal I-9. That paper form has proven virtually worthless, primarily because employers are prohibited from scrutinizing the underlying documentation. Their goal has been to remove the I-9 option, which has continued to be pushed by lobbyists for farm and business interests.
As a compromise last week, Sen. McConnell revived his proposal to create a South Carolina version of the federal paper verification system — titled S.C. Verify — which would allow employer scrutiny of documentation and include much tougher fines. Thus the new immigration bill would have three verification options — the S.C. driver's license, which is considered the most reliable; the new federal computerized E-Verify that already has proven successful in a number of states; and the new paper version titled S.C. Verify.
The fact that Senate opponents of reform were willing to buy the new S.C. Verify option has raised suspicions that it too is fatally flawed. Sen. Campsen, however, describes the S.C. Verify as a "beefed up" version of what Sen. McConnell proposed earlier but couldn't get past Senate opponents.
But Gov. Sanford contends that portions of the S.C. Verify are unenforceable because they pre-empt portions of the federal paper verification system — the I-9. What if the governor is right? Sen. Campsen doesn't see that as a major problem. He points out that the bill has a severability clause. He believes that a challenge could eliminate the entire S.C. Verify, leaving only the S.C. driver's license and the federal E-Verify as options, which is what most reformers have wanted all along.
But the governor's chief of staff, Scott English, disagrees. He notes that the S.C. Verify language requires that the paper form comply with federal immigration and employment rules — which he says means it must be the same form as the controversial I-9.
If there is to be an S.C. version of the I-9, Mr. English contends that the enforcement should be revised. Rather than putting it under the S.C. Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulations, which he says has no staff or funds for the task, it would better placed under the attorney general's office.
While there may be a need for some revision, at least the immigration bill "still is in play," as Sen. Campsen notes.
It may well be midweek before the House weighs in on the revamped bill, which is stronger in terms of private employer verification than the bill that body sent to the Senate. Meanwhile, the governor's office has made suggestions to the House leadership about possible changes.
What's needed at this point is for reformers on both sides of the aisle and in the governor's office to put aside hurt feelings and strong words and work toward passage of a law that will make this state as off limits as possible to illegal immigrants. Otherwise this session will end with one more regrettable victory for, in Sen. McConnell's words, "those special interests in the lobby."
Comments
Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.
Notice about comments:Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Read our full Terms and Conditions.
Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!
Thank you for your interest in this story. The comment thread for this article has been closed.
- Most Commented
- Most Emailed
- Shared
- Upper King on rise: Hotels, apartments, restaurants changing face of downtown area
- UPDATE: Missing woman's fiance seen leaving scene of burned SUV, carrying a shovel
- Missing woman case gets murkier
- Magnolia Gardens offering free dream wedding to contest winner
- Body of missing woman's fiance was found near handgun
- Pinterest: Pinning hopes and dreams
- DAVID SLADE: S.C. offers hybrid car tax credit
- Black women today: Strong. Resilient. Ambitious.
- Ex-Boeing worker claims racism, retaliation in firing
- MCDERMOTT COLUMN: Golf business has risks, rewards



