Connect with us:   Subscribe to the paper  |   View the mobile edition  |   Get daily e-mail news  |   Get mobile alerts  |   Share your photos  |   Report news  |   Place an ad  |   Contact us


As a commuter car, Chevrolet wagon excels

BY WARREN BROWN
The Washington Post
Friday, May 2, 2008


The 2008 Chevrolet HHR SS Turbo Wagon, available in a panel version, has a maximum cargo capacity of 63 cubic feet and can be equipped to tow 1,000 pounds.

Wieck Media

The 2008 Chevrolet HHR SS Turbo Wagon, available in a panel version, has a maximum cargo capacity of 63 cubic feet and can be equipped to tow 1,000 pounds.

2008 Chevy HHR SS Turbo

Body style: Front-wheel-drive, compact urban wagon available in five versions — base LS, Panel LS, upscale LT, Panel LT and sporty SS. Passenger models have four side doors. Panel versions are two-seaters with windowless rear doors.

Base Price: $22,710 (as tested is $25,240).

Engine, transmission: Turbocharged, 2.0 liter four-cylinder motor developing 260-hp, mated to a standard five-speed manual transmission.

Fuel mileage: 20 mpg, 28 mpg highway.

Safety: Four-wheel, anti-lock brakes, electronic stability and traction control are standard.

Options: Four-speed automatic transmission, side and head air bags, premium sound system, XM Satellite radio.

We spent an attentive week in the real world driving to work, shopping malls, banks, schools and medical offices. We also did spring cleaning, which meant hauling lots of wastefully purchased stuff to the dump.

"Attentive week" means we gave particular notice to what we were doing while not trying to do anything special, with the exception of remaining keenly aware of how we used the vehicle in question, the 2008 Chevrolet HHR SS Turbo wagon.

The idea was to see how automotive marketing and automotive journalism, at least that part of it related to product reviews, measure up to the reality of daily driving in a huge, perennially congested metropolitan area. Our verdict: They don't.

That is an anecdotal judgment, as opposed to a scientific one. It is based on the experience of two people, me and my wife, driving one compact, front-wheel-drive wagon in the Washington metropolitan area, mostly in its Virginia suburbs.

Our observations:

--Horsepower is irrelevant in tightly congested traffic. Our turbocharged, 260-horsepower, front-wheel-drive HHR SS moved no faster than the lower-horsepower automobiles trapped with us.

--A stylistic throwback to the 1949 Chevrolet Suburban, the HHR SS is nobody's darling in tight curves, where it must be handled gently and with some forethought. But it doesn't matter, because there aren't that many roads in the Washington area that allow drivers to safely "take curves" the way it's done in TV commercials and on test tracks.

--The HHR SS excels in its design- intent milieu, city-suburban schlepping. It's the perfect commuter, big enough to carry five adults. With its rear seats down, forming a nearly flat load floor, the wagon can carry lots of junk, enough to fill 63 cubic feet.

--The HHR SS has excellent straight-line ride and handling. It has acceptable handling in curves, meaning the HHR SS will behave well if you approach curves carefully. Acceleration is good. As for head-turning quotient, the HHR SS is alluring in the manner of a well-armed small town that is also well-manicured, filled with churches and bereft of bitterness.

The bottom line: What we see in TV commercials and read in zoom-zoom product reviews is mostly fantasy. Some of us might have the wherewithal to buy a super-performance car. But hardly any of us driving in metropolitan America will have the opportunity to exploit its full potential.

That being the case, a four-cylinder wagon with a little get-up-and-go and a lot of personality would serve many of us just fine.

If you agree, take a look at the HHR with or without sporty SS trim.




Article tools





Sponsored Links



Latest local stories

Notice about comments:
Charleston.net is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Charleston.net does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not charleston.net. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Comments

This article has  0 comment(s)


(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Search Charleston.Net Archives for Latest News






Charleston.Net Customer Care | Subscribe to Paper, Register for email news updates, manage your online account, place a classified ad, or contact us




Charleston.net logo

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 the Evening Post Publishing Co.

Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of service, Privacy policy and our Parental consent form. (Updated 2/9/2007)