Posted by ChrisPia on May 1, 2008 at 6:17 a.m. (Suggest removal)

The taxpayer will pay again and again in Dorchesterchester county..Anyone know how much money is being paid out by the taxpayers for all these Lawsuits filed against Ray nash and his cronies? At This rate the lawsuits will double last years total.Close to 20 this year already..
Maybe He was too busy changing the purchase orders for S&R Technologies to fit the Audit?
He should Resign.

Posted by ChrisPia on May 1, 2008 at 6:34 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I Find it Interesting That I am Being bashed in the summerville journal for saying Ray Nash may have set up Sen. Scott.
I have researched campaign disclosure for Mr Rose and observed 3 very vocal supporters of Ray Nash that have donated to his campaign. I have also noticed that bot Mr Rose and Mr Boatwright were stationed at the Airforce Academy.The same Bill gothard Principles used at the DCSO under Ray Nash were the subject of a number of lawsuits by a lawyer named Mikey Weinstein.
To Top that off ,Sgt Bottens report details He received a phone call before stopping the car after the car stopped in a bi-lo and was observed for several minutes for a video car to show up..(Where did the money go for 3 video cameras in cars? 4 cars-1 with video).Who ordered the stop? Now if you look at the public disclosure form of Mr Rose you might have the same questions..
Now ,I am not bashing the officers because they did what they were ordered to did with the threat of losing there job if they didn't.Authority without question. Chain Of Command.Citizens are Fools?

Posted by bkc6 on May 1, 2008 at 7:37 a.m. (Suggest removal)

ChrisPia - remember a couple weeks ago I said that more was coming? Well, it's here. I wish I could say more but I have worked for the man over the past 27 years and out of respect for him I will keep my mouth shut. I bet Nash wishes he never saw that $15. Keep up the good work. Have a nice day.

Posted by Early on May 1, 2008 at 7:51 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Be careful, I believe the $15 processing fee is a good thing if PROPERLY managed.

Posted by AuntBea on May 1, 2008 at 8:08 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I can't believe the old man had to contact a lawyer, file a lawsuit and contact the media to get his $15 back. Any time I want a refund (for a purchase, for damaged goods, etc.), I usually just send a polite letter and I have always received good results.

I wonder why the old fella didn't just write a letter (as he was told to do) and request a refund? Oh wait! I know! He likes to do his business by stirring the pot, contacting the media, filing lawsuits. Heck, is his lawyer working for free? I doubt it. If Mr. Limehouse really just wanted his $15, he could even have saved a stamp seeing how he works just a couple hundred yards from the Sheriff's Office.

What are Mr. Limehouse's real motives?

Posted by ChrisPia on May 1, 2008 at 8:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Aunt Bea...I have wrote a letter to ray Nash Numerous times with No response. All I want is them to come and pick up their uniforms and badge and I'D card.I went to the annex to hand it in and told by a Captain he won't accept it. I would have to bring it to the jail...I went Home and wrote numerous letters to no avail.
Why Didn't they just cut him a 15 dollar check when his case was dismissed? Did it take that long to pay for food for Romanian Police chiefs?
I would bet his motives are to show What Ray Nash really is. A proven mistater of the truth to benefit his agenda.

Posted by ChrisPia on May 1, 2008 at 8:28 a.m. (Suggest removal)

The Rachlin audit Update dated April 18,2008 stated that While Developing evidence they were conferring with the Dorchester County Administrator,Deputy Administrator,Finance Manager,Sheriff and County Council Chairman regarding tenative findings..All the Individuals identified above were routinely briefed regarding the tentative findings and ongoing forensic examination in accordance the requiements of the expanded engagement letter.THEN they were to Assemble evidence and Provide SLED for Investigative Purposes...
Does Anyone See a Problem with This?

Posted by AuntBea on May 1, 2008 at 8:42 a.m. (Suggest removal)

ChrisPia, If you were told you had to bring that stuff to the jail, why didn't you? Do you have a problem with following procedures? Why do you think you should be an exception to the established procedure?

Posted by localboy on May 1, 2008 at 9:26 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I don't know if ChrisPia is a lunatic or not but while he's digging into Mr. Rose campaign finance he might want to do the same for the other Senator running in this election - you know the one who couldn't stand by himself while being interviewed by Sgt. Botten; the one who was just visiting a friend who had been in bed two hours and didn't know he was coming; the one who wouldn't ask for an AG's opinion for 300+ taxpayers who were charged an estimated 200 each illegally but thought 15 was important enough - you will find some really interesting donations from developers and DUI layers who lobby AGAINST stronger DUI penalties while 80% of traffic deaths in 2008 are DUI related.
I've never worked for a company I left (I can't speak for insubordination and being fired) that I expected them to pick up their property. The simple common sense thing is to turn in that property because you never know whom you may work for one day so treat them all with respect. I think the line was "turn the other cheek"! I think all should take ChrisPia for what he's spewing "sour grapes".

Posted by highclass on May 1, 2008 at 9:34 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Nash's hands are far from clean. It seems to me his world is coming aprt at the seams. The whole truth is yet to be revealed.

Posted by LowcountryMoose on May 1, 2008 at 10:03 a.m. (Suggest removal)

What kind of snacks did they server the Romanians? Eating a steamy plate of chitlins is surely character-building.

Posted by notafan on May 1, 2008 at 10:08 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Limehouse and Knight are running buddies so anything Limehouse will do anything to help his good ol boy get elected.

And Chris Pia you are getting bashed because you obviously have a agenda against Nash since you were fired from the jail. You try any and everything you can to bash Nash and see that your good ol boy Knight is elected. Afterall acording to Sen Scott we will not need to worry about DUI's in Dorchester County once Knight is elected. Or that rule may apply only to good ol boys. We will need Scott to explain this further.

I find it odd that Knight has yet to address Scott's comments after his arrest. Does anyone else think Knight should make some sort of statement about Scott's comments?

Posted by ChrisPia on May 1, 2008 at 11:05 a.m. (Suggest removal)

That quote Notafan was absurd. Lc Knight did not say it nor Condone it.. What about Mr Roses quotes on the situation?Answer my question on who ordered the officers by Telephone to make the stop? Why so Many cameras not working in the cars? Could it be Ray Nash ?
Local Boy Why I did Just that. I also dug into LC Knights,Ray Nash's and Senator Scotts. I tried to get Harry T Boatwrights But it was not Posted to my surprise.
Local Boy.. The simple common sense thing to do was For the Captain to accept my property when I tried to Return it at The DCSO at the Annex which is close to my Home..At that point I was not employed by The DCSO and feared more retaliation..So I decided to use my common sense and write them a letter to come and get it.I even had them dry cleaned.
You emphasize How Dangerous DUI's are for The Community(I Agree) and yet you have not mentioned why a suspected drunk driver was not stopped at the Bi-lo parking lot and let to drive back out into the public so you can video him.Only after a Phone Call from >>>>Did they stop Mr Scott.
I can tell you when I first saw him stumble I thought he was drunk.His driving wasn't the best either. But Then I heard about his one leg,Seen the video on the news showing the cracked concrete,Him Blowing 3 seperate zero's and talking coherenty at the test(saying some assinine things).I then read the immediate comments of Mr Rose,Obtained the Police report of Sgt Botten and researched campaign disclosure forms of Mr Rose.Identified at least 3 individuals that have wrote articles to this paper and the Summerville journal in Support of Ray nash during these troubled times.I realized that Senator Scott actually Pushed this audit. And then I connected Harry T Boatright and Senator Rose to the Airforce academy that was having the similar scandels based on the Bill Gothard teachings.The past history of Ray Nash's insubordinate Firings and Harassment are probably the reason why officers followed orders to Stop that car that evening..Authority without Question...........Could This Be The Common sense You were looking for?

Posted by remeber04 on May 1, 2008 at 11:06 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Time brings all things to light.

Posted by ChrisPia on May 1, 2008 at 11:20 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Contributor Name Date Amount ($)
Turner, Scott G 03/16/2008 10.00
McClure, Ray 03/17/2008 25.00
Mikell, Bob 03/17/2008 50.00
Cook, Evelyn 03/28/2008 50.00
Turner, Ronald 03/23/2008 50.00
Emery, James 03/16/2008 100.00
Schall, Michael D 03/06/2008 100.00
McGraw, James D 03/16/2008 100.00
Cregger, Marvin H 03/16/2008 100.00
Stewart, Janice 03/24/2008 100.00
Kann, Randy 03/27/2008 252.50
Kann, Aleene 03/28/2008 500.00
Cecil, Carl 03/20/2008 500.00
Shelbourne, Linda 03/25/2008 809.41
Rose, Michael T 03/04/2008 10,000.00

This are the people whom donated to Mr Roses campaign.

Posted by ChrisPia on May 1, 2008 at 11:25 a.m. (Suggest removal)

http://www.charleston.net/news/2008/apr/...
Read the officers report.

Posted by ChrisPia on May 1, 2008 at 11:44 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Request for Proposal
Date: March 26, 2008

Issued by: Dorchester County Sheriff’s Office

Subject:
Consultant Company to perform services as Chief Information Officer (CIO) for the
Dorchester County Sheriff’s Office (DCSO)

Background:
DCSO is seeking proposals from consulting companies to provide professional services in the
arena of information technology expertise where the primary focus of these services is the
development and on-going maintenance for the line of business applications which directly
support the law enforcement requirements of the DCSO. The DCSO is required by South
Carolina law to maintain certain records and books regarding the law enforcement activities
of the DCSO. Some of these records are incident reports, detention bookings, 911 calls,
criminal histories, juvenile reports, victim information, radio dispatching, traffic tickets,
warrants served, pending warrants, police actions, etc. The proper technology solutions
enhance the ability of the Sheriff to carry out these responsibilities in an accurate, timely,
legal and professional manner.

The Dorchester County ITS department provides support for the county network
infrastructure and PC level support but the support of the DCSO line of business applications
does not fall within the scope of the Dorchester ITS authority. DCSO maintains a completely
independent domain for its operations and manages all the DCSO data according to the
DCSO Computer Use Policy.

The successful bidder will be awarded a three year contract as the sole provider of these
services in order to provide continuity and long term strategic value to DCSO. The contract
agreement may be terminated at any time on sixty (60) days advanced written notice by
either party.

Posted by ChrisPia on May 1, 2008 at 11:46 a.m. (Suggest removal)

The primary software vendors for the line of business applications are SMART Public Safety
Software, VisionAir and S&R Technology Group. SMART provides the systems for jail
management, warrants and incident reporting. VisionAir provides the CAD (Computer Aided
Dispatch) system. S&R Technology Group provides a comprehensive custom-written intranet
system which is the main platform for collecting and analyzing all the DCSO operational
information.

The bidders that apply to do the work of the CIO must be able to perform and provide each of
the following job description services:
•Establish and direct the strategic long term goals, policies and procedures for an
information technology department. Determine the organization's long-term systems
needs and hardware acquisitions to accomplish the DCSO law enforcement objectives.
•Be responsible for determining DCSO information security standards. Develop and
implement information security standards and procedures. Ensure that all information
systems are functional and secure.
•As the information services consultant, they will work with DCSO command staff and
other DCSO employees to evaluate and solve technical problems. Evaluate existing
systems and/or user needs to analyze, design, recommend, and implement system
changes.
•Must be a software development engineer who can design, modify, develop, write and
implement software programming applications. Support and/or install software
applications/operating systems. Participate in the testing process through test review and
analysis, test witnessing and certification of software. Design, plan, and coordinate work
teams. Provide technical support to project team members.
•Must be able to take the project lead and be an Applications Systems Programmer to
design, plan, and coordinate work teams. Provide technical support to project team
members. Handle complex application features and technical designs. Design and
implement the components required for complex application features.
•Must be a business systems analyst who can review, analyze, and evaluate business
systems, and user needs. Formulates systems to parallel overall law enforcement
strategies. Writes detailed description of user needs, program functions, and steps
required to develop or modify computer programs.
•.

Posted by ChrisPia on May 1, 2008 at 11:47 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Must be a business application delivery manager whose task will be to improve the
business processes and support critical business strategies by managing the development,
implementation, and maintenance of business applications systems. Leads multiple
projects and oversees developers to ensure that specifications are met.
Requirements:
The successful bidder for this proposal will need to have the following requirements within
their organization: 1.Demonstrated proficiency related to information processing experience (Minimum 15
years experience) 2.More than 5 years of continued related work in a law enforcement agency 3.Available for on call support for DCSO 7 days a week, 365 days per year 4.Programming proficiency in Adobe Cold Fusion language in order to enhance and
support the DCSO Intranet
5.Experience with structured cabling for data networks 6.Experience in installing and supporting Dell network servers and workstations 7.At least 5 years of experience with Microsoft SQL Server application development 8.At least 5 years of experience as a database administrator for MS SQL 9.At least 5 years of experience working with web based applications which are data
driven 10.Demonstrated proficiency in scripting with Active PDF function calls 11.Demonstrated proficiency in training law enforcement employees to include admin
and sworn officers 12.Demonstrated ability to interview end users to identify the real problems and sort
through them to predict upcoming difficulties and implement system changes to
address the problems 13.Able to demonstrate proficiency in testing, analyzing and implementation of system
applications in a law enforcement environment 14.Demonstrate proficiency with the Records Management System and Jail Management
System of Smart Public Safety Software as well as VisionAir CAD and web based
Intranet technology 15.Demonstrate proficiency in web design and maintenance. 16.On-site work – each calendar year the DCSO will require a minimum of 4 weeks and
a maximum of 12 weeks of on-site support. The length of on-site visits will be
determined by the annual DCSO budget for these services Bidding Requirements:

Posted by ChrisPia on May 1, 2008 at 11:47 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Each bidder should submit a complete portfolio or resume for the proposed consultant which
shows the professional experience for the candidate.

The bidder will also provide details regarding the experience of the candidate for each
requirement and for each various job description requirements.

The bidder will provide 3 references of work of a similar scope.

The bidder will also provide the daily fees to be charged to DCSO for remote and on-site
work. The pricing can be different, depending upon the type of work being done for the
customer. If travel/lodging fees are charged when on-site, submit those fees.

Proposer shall provide one (1) original and seven (7) copies of your submittal.

All bids must be received by April 3, 2008 at 3 PM by the buyer:
Lana Vasquez 212 Deming Way #9 Summerville, SC 29483
The proposals will be reviewed by a committee consisting of Sheriff Ray Nash, Chief of Staff
Barnes, Chief Deputy Major, Major Turner, Major Hartline, Sgt. Tilton, and Linda Driggers.
Advisors to the committee will be Michael Boatwright and Samuel Stephens

Posted by ChrisPia on May 1, 2008 at 11:50 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Could somebody tell me Why we paid so much money to S&R technology and what that money was used for? Now I know why they refused the auditors request for Documentation> Is Mr Franklin Smith and Bo raehard still employed to do It Work?

Posted by localboy on May 1, 2008 at 12:06 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Chrispia,
Give me a break - you'd been canned - what did you have to worry about - they can't fire you twice?
I have spoken with several local law enforcement officers who saw the tape (none of whom work for the DCSO and at least two that are state employees) that said they'd have arrested him too.
Don't buy the one leg leg story - go to Youtube and watch him stand for 10 minutes without wavering at a campaign speech.
And unless you have other motives I am not certain how Rose's contributors are germane to the issue.
Notafan's quote isn't absurd and I've wondered why Knight didn't distance himself either. I haven't supported either candidate for Sheriff - publicly or privately - but it was very clear that Scott believed that he would have been given a break by Knight because he was Randy Scott - GED waving/ex-exterminator (except for termites)/good ol boy Senator extraordinaire. All Knight had to do is state publicly that no one who breaks the law would be immune from justice - he hasn't done that. Hmmmmm???? Wonder why? Nash may not be perfect but he's not running for Sheriff either!
Were Boatright and Rose at the Academy at the same time? Did Boatright even attend the academy or was he simply in the AF?
I'm a local boy but not a good ol boy - the difference - I don't care if we're friends or not, wrong is wrong and I'll call you on it.

Posted by localboy on May 1, 2008 at 12:13 p.m. (Suggest removal)

As for why they allowed Scott back on the road - a HP officer said that is common practice in the HP to record the subjects actions to ensure that all the evidence os there so that those attorney's who like to get drunk drivers off criminal convictions have more difficult times. Attorney's who write books like "101 Was to avoid a DUI conviction". Did I mention that 8% of the highway fatalities are a result of DUI's for 2008 in SC?

Posted by Girleygirl on May 1, 2008 at 12:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)

LMAO- you all called ChrisPia out and here he go posting his facts...lol.

I wonder how many more lawsuits will come about due to this fee.....

Posted by localboy on May 1, 2008 at 12:46 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Bufort Blanton owner country club $500.00
Earl R DuPriest Jr. developer $1,000.00
Steve C DuPriest utilties $1,000.00
Berlin G Myers mayor $500.00
Patrick J Murphy retired naval officer $100.00
Norman r murdaugh Jr. SC Forestry Commission $200.00
John F Murphree developer $1,000.00
Mark C Joye lawyer $1,000.00 IMAGINE THIS!?!?
mary S Graham retired $200.00
LA Motors Inc $500.00 I hope he wasn't driving one of theirs
Hughes Motors Inc $500.00
TUPCO Inc developer $500.00
Mark C Joye attorney $1,000.00 What? Again!
Sandra P Fennell Sanitation $500.00
K-Stores Inc 4 $500.00
David W Bunch
Awendaw, SC 29429 $500.00
Scott Fennell sanitation $500.00
John M Tupper Jr.self employed $500.00
J M Murphree developer $300.00
SC Senate Republican Caucus $525.00
Ronnie M Givens accountant $1,000.00
SC Bankers State PAC $500.00
McNair law Firm PA $500.00 Maybe he uses them in Cola DUIs
Trucking Insustry $1,000.00
Harry L Knight not reported $50.00
William J Totten machine shop owner $1,000.00
SCPMA PAC $1,000.00
BCBS $400.00
SCDA DENPAC $250.00
olin j mccurry retired educator $1,000.00
John D Allston fireman $250.00
Charpia Properties LLC $500.00
Lawrence Painting LLC
Moncks Corner, SC 29461 $100.00
William M Rogers Sr. retired nursing homes $1,000.00
SCANA Empl PAC $1,000.00
SCANA PAC $1,000.00
BP North america Employee PAC
warrenville, IL 60555 $500.00

Scott's contributions - Developers, his DUI attorney's firm, Health Care PAC's. How about those folks from off? Wonder what favors they're looking for?

Posted by notafan on May 1, 2008 at 12:57 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Good ol boy system alive and well in Dorchester County. And everyone wonders why Dorchester County is going down the tubes.

When or will LC Knight address the comments made by Scott after his arrest?

And what was Scott doing during the few hours between him leaving the church and being pulled over by the cops. He and his wonderful attorney's seem to overlook that time period and only focus on the two glasses of wine he had at church. He must have forgotten about that time period. I also have blackouts when I am home pounding liquor.

Posted by ChrisPia on May 1, 2008 at 1:07 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Why does LC Knight have to come out and speak on this. These are not his words or his actions?This was spouted by an angry man whom thought he was being set up by a corrupt Sheriff.He quoted a man of Intregrity(Lc. Knight) and stated this would not happen under his watch .
Local boy...I have trouble with many things that are common practice in this area. The Bottom line is it is a direct threat to the safety of the community..If the alleged drunk driver(Mr Scott) Hits and kills someone after not being stopped in a parking lot(when he should have been and arrested If he felt he was intoxicated). Who is at Fault? Whats right is right and wrong is wrong?.....Once again who made the phone call to Stop this car? Why so many cars without video systems? Why didn't the original observing officer make the stop and go to another call?
it is also common practice to fire and Harass people for their religious beliefs,political beliefs . It doesn't make it right.

Posted by ChrisPia on May 1, 2008 at 1:22 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Didn't Luke Turner Marry Pastor Mike Lewis daughter at Cathedral of praise?
Doesn't Sheriff Nash have a Major Mike Turner?
Doesn't Sheriff Nash Hand pick everyone in his Department?
are they Related to the people on Mike Roses campaign disclosure?
Could The Phone call and Order to stop this car been political?
Dosn't Nash's staff Go to cathedral of Praise?

Posted by JohnS on May 1, 2008 at 1:41 p.m. (Suggest removal)

He was told some of his signs were knocked down along that road. He was not sure what houses had signs. He needed to go left and right as to shine lights on the yards. Signs are expensive. He told the officer this but the officer did not listen.

The video showed at the office Scott appears not to be drunk. Mr Scott asked for a lawyer 22 seconds after his rights were read. The officer did not allow him to call his lawyer saying the test had already started. Mr. Scott was not told that any test had started. The officer running the machine seemed to have a reading problem as he had a hard time reading Mr. Scott his rights. I am sure the officer will be asked his education background at trial.

Posted by highclass on May 1, 2008 at 2:33 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Thomas1776- Trying to degrade LC to bring attention away from Nash. Good attempt but these are Nash's mistakes not LC's.
notafan- For once I agree with you. Good ol boy system alive and well in Dorchester County. And everyone wonders why Dorchester County is going down the tubes.
It looks like it is going down the tubes because of Nash and his goons.

Posted by mosinfan on May 1, 2008 at 3:04 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I knew when I saw the paper this morning that ChrisPia was going to have an anerism again today. I bet the P&C IT staff holds their breath whenever one of these stories posts. The server probably blows a fuse from this guys rants.

Posted by mosinfan on May 1, 2008 at 3:13 p.m. (Suggest removal)

ChrisPia, you have to rank up there with some of the most slanderous people that post on this thread.

You list contributors to Mike Roses campaign as if you are insinuating some kind of crime or nefarious activity. Get a clue dude, contributing to a political campaign is completely legal as long as it does not excede the specified amount.

Furthermore, even though it is your right to access who is contributing, do you think its wise and fair for you to print these peoples names on this site or any other are for that matter without their permission. Yes, I know you are free to do that but do you think its very ethical? Especially since you are always on your high ethical horse!

Posted by ldd1 on May 1, 2008 at 3:18 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Enough is enough!!!There are those of you that are just unreal.Chrispia,you jump at every chance you can to tarnish a good mans name,Ray Nash.Give it up.Everyone knows that you are living a very bitter life because you were fired.But,do you really have to bore everyone with all of your rants.It would be ok if you would just comment on the current article and not continue to bring up volumns of hate.You are taking up the space that intelligent blogers could be using.

Thomas1776,What is your beef?You always jump right in and bad mouth Ray Nash.It appears that you just want to get on the site and say something bad,just to be saying something.Do you really even know the sheriff or are you a true believer of the Chrispia cult?History will show that Ray has accomplished and given more to Dorchester Cty than you or Chrispia will ever be able to acheive.

Posted by mosinfan on May 1, 2008 at 3:19 p.m. (Suggest removal)

As for the L.C. Knight issue...

His silence is deafening.

Posted by mosinfan on May 1, 2008 at 3:26 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Well said Idd1, the guy (ChrisPia) needs serious help. Its almost like the movie Fatal Attraction. Hopefully we wont read about someone someday attempting something crazy with Sherriff Nash or his family. It wont take much to do the Sherlock Holmes thing and find out who this kook is.

Posted by Magpie on May 1, 2008 at 3:46 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Chris Pia - You take up too much space with your rantings. I quit reading anything you write. It appears all you want to do is stir the pot and you have an ax to grind. BTW, why is it that you no longer work for Ray Nash????

Posted by ChrisPia on May 1, 2008 at 3:55 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Mosinfan... Interesting You didn't admonish Local Boy for posting the same disclosure names for Senator scott.
Public knowledge is not unethical...Lying to the public on numerous proven occasions is.Using taxpayer monies for your own personal business benefit falls into unethical also.
Slander is saying words that are not true. Printing them on paper is libel if they are Not true. Public Figures and Civilians have different criteria.Asking a question...to your contrary belief is not Slander Or Libel. Calling someone something that isn't true is slander.(such as the name thatyou have called me).The facts and questions I raise have the truth in them. I can see I have touched a nerve...If You don't want your name in the campaign disclosure than don't donate...I wonder when Harry T Boatwright will release his disclosure of contributions. that should be interesting.

Posted by mosinfan on May 1, 2008 at 4:06 p.m. (Suggest removal)

ChrisPia, the only nerves I have touched are the one protruding from your neck and forehead.

As for LocalBoy, is noticed that but it appeared obvious to me that he was making a point about your inane action.

You have not addressed the purpose of listing those folks names. What was the point, other than inuendo. Are all of these folks crooked because they contributed to the guys campaign. Is the candidate crooked because someon donated to him. What is your point? Again, slander is what it looks like to me.

Posted by ChrisPia on May 1, 2008 at 4:21 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Magpie I'm still a little confused on That But the official charge was insubordination For Not revealing the source of MRSA at The Jail.....At The time I was repeatedly told by administration that there was none after a Nurse told them they had a couple of cases but unknown exact amount..I was asked who my source was after the nurse revealed this info to administration.They pressed me for my source. I said I will not tell them .They already knew that my info was correct.I was placed on administrative leave the next day after being asked again for my source.I was then ordered to come in to a Hearing...i was asked again to reveal my source . I said I refused. I was fired for 3 counts of insubordination.
Before this I was Brought into the Admin Office because I had an LC Knight Sticker on my carwindow. I was told I should remove if from my window and told I work at the will of the Sheriff. I was harassed and havea letter from Chief barnes stating this.
My work ethic was great and I always had the safety of my collegues first and foremost on my mind. I had Contacted OSHA about enormous amounts of safety issues at the jailthat was ignored till I advised admin That contacted OSHA. Then County Council Provided Nash with an Additional 30K of taxpayers money to fix up theplace before OSHA Got There...My Partner was Fired for Defending My Harassment.
This is not the First time That Harassment and Intimidation has gone on in Ray Nash's past. He has a vast History of Firing people for living out of wedlock,Working on an opponents campaign,Sexual Harassment etc..(A proven Pattern of Abuse.)
These cases were settled each time and hidden from the media on some occasions.
This has been going on for Many Years Under The Nash Administrations.Nobody has put a stop to this. It's wrong...

THe Facts Speak for themselves and once again My question have not been answered and I have been labeled again. LOL

Posted by ldd1 on May 1, 2008 at 4:24 p.m. (Suggest removal)

ChrisPia,Go back in time.Did LC Knight not do the same thing by including names of some of his contributors on a mail out letter accusing Ray Nash of supporting wife beaters,and such during their last campaign? Oh my,word about town was that some folks were very upset that their names were included in such a nasty letter.Do you not think that the folks listed by you might feel the same?Some things are better left on public list thus allowing the nosy folks that really want to know such info to be able to look it up for themselves.

Posted by localboy on May 1, 2008 at 4:41 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Mosinfan, you understood correctly! In defense of the info it is public record and I did remove the addresses. The real point is "What was the point and how does Mike Rose tie into a charge of 15 dollars made to those arrested relate to the Senate campaign?" Unless of course there is an ax to grind because someone got canned! Or unless the drive to keep the Good Ol' Boy network strong.
I recognize about 6 people on the Rose donation list and I don't believe any of them have relatives that work for the DCSO.
As for the right to call your attorney - you have the right to have an attorney present during questioning - that is what the law requires! It does not require that an attorney be present during the administration of a breathalyzer test nor does it permit him to be present during the response to simple question such as what is your name and address. It's been upheld as high as the Supreme Court when challenged - look it up!
To the article article at hand this is certainly purely political in nature. Going to court to recover 15 dollars? I only wish there was a serious charge for filing frivolous lawsuits and then we'd have time to prosecute those heavyweight gamblers from Hanahan or drunk drivers such as seen on the Scott video.
Again, you will note on many occasions that law enforcement officials follow a suspect drunk driver to capture his actions and also to ensure that they are pulling someone they have reason to believe is drunk and not just stupid (or in some cases both!).
Finally, look at the support group from Cola that is behind some of these folks - Rod Shealy - the one who cares not about the state as long as his candidates win. While he may not have invented dirty politics he has come close to perfecting it!

Posted by localboy on May 1, 2008 at 4:50 p.m. (Suggest removal)

ChrisPia even though SC is a right to work state if you were fired improperly almost any attorney would have represented you in a wrongful termination suit. How did that case go by the way? Did anyone read about the cases of MRSA at Trident Hospital, Summerville High, etc., etc.,
If nash fired someone for Sexual Harassment then he is certainly doing his job. If organizational policy prohibits its employees from living out of wedlock then those folks should have been fired too. I can't stand some of my company policies - they're silly - but I think that my job is important to my family and I can live with those silly policies. Is it - If you can't stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen?
If you weren't smart enough to hide your aspirations for another Sheriff to take over while working for one then I'm not certain you're smart enough to be working for either one. Now note I said hide those aspirations not change them. History is full of people who lost their jobs because they never learned the art of subtlety.

Posted by ChrisPia on May 1, 2008 at 5:14 p.m. (Suggest removal)

LocalBoy ,I do believe that Nash has Claimed on Numerous occasions He Is a Defender of the Constitution. Were my constitutional rights violated?
My Attorney has reached out to DCSO for a response to a mediation. Unbelievably He didn't get a response,So we should be filing shortly.

Posted by ChrisPia on May 1, 2008 at 5:24 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Idd1, I believe that story in the past had some facts to it.
Part of the campaign Process is Public Disclosure. If You don't want it known then don't contribute or write letters praising Nash.I always thought that Mr Rose was a supporter of LC Knight.I probably will not pull a lever in the Senators race to be Honest with you....But I still Think that the situation with Mr scott was Political. WHO made the call and ordered the officers to stop the Senators car?

Posted by ChrisPia on May 1, 2008 at 5:26 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Organizational Policy?????? Meaning Bill gothards Cultism?

Posted by ChrisPia on May 1, 2008 at 5:42 p.m. (Suggest removal)

How Can We be giving Nash and S&R technology More taxpayer Monies For a computer system? Didn't Taxpayers learn there lesson the first time these companies were discovered without proper purchase orders?

Posted by ChrisPia on May 1, 2008 at 6:49 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Michaels Advocate.. Why is lawsuit insane? Does this man not desrve his money abck as wellas others...Whats insane is that if Nash would just issue a check when the case is dismissed,We as taxpayers wouldn't be footing the legal fees when he loses this case...
I have asked for mediation through my attorney. Here is what I would want as a settlement at this Time.
A Public apology by Nash,Back Pay,a Comparable Dorchester county job, My lawyers fees paid and to be left alone from any further harassment.

Posted by bkc6 on May 1, 2008 at 6:49 p.m. (Suggest removal)

ChrisPia - a while back I got upset because of something someone said and I took it personal because my son is in the Army overseas. A wise man typed me and said to just let them vent and don't worry about it. Remember that? I have a suggestion for you... Just let them vent. Don't worry about it. I know that at least 5 of those who are commenting work for the DCSD and are afraid of losing their jobs. So take a deep breath, let it out slowly, and don't worry. We know what's going on. Just let them run their mouths. By the way, in my last e-mail my son asked us to say hi to ChrisPia and thank you. He will do his damnest to continue doing his job so we can sleep in peace tonight.

Posted by ChrisPia on May 1, 2008 at 6:52 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Can I send a care package to him? What does He need besides TP?

Posted by bkc6 on May 1, 2008 at 7:02 p.m. (Suggest removal)

ChrisPia - Thank you but he's fine. Where he is it's hard to receive anything even a letter. He tells us that all is fine and he's doing great. All we can do is trust in God to watch over him and take care of him. Thank you again for your offer.

Posted by creeker on May 1, 2008 at 7:30 p.m. (Suggest removal)

WoWWWWWW!!! is about all I can say about this thread.
chrispia, did you move to S.C. to have all of your yankee stuff here, like unions. If that is what you want with the warm weather, do like all the other yankees, and go to Fla.
We like what we have here and don't plan on changing it for you or anybody!!!!
You claim to be retired from The NYC police, and then impune the authority of the deputys that arrested Randy Scott! For there to be a vast conspiracy as you claim, at least half a dozen deputys would have to be involved!
Here's a suggestion for you. Nash has a karate studio on Dorchester rd. why don't you take your stuff there and give it to him personally, and while you are there why don't you offer to bury the hatchet and challenge him to a fight at his studio winner take all. I believe yo'all would be within the same age range, but I don't know how tall or heavy you are? Just a hint, unless you are 6'7" and about 270lbs I would stear clear of the guy, because he will more than likley bust you into three or four seperate pieces!!@!!!!! Nash is no joke when it comes to fighting, but you were a BIG NYC cop for 20 years, come on go for it, I would be glad to meet you in the Summerville med emergency roon of course,,,, your turn

Posted by bkc6 on May 1, 2008 at 7:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)

RELAX TAKE A DEEP BREATH Try to enjoy life. Push yourself away from the computer and walk outside for 20 minutes. After your walk, your brain is clear and you are relaxed. Than get back on the computer. GET IT?

Posted by ChrisPia on May 2, 2008 at 6:09 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Nash sold the dojo.

Posted by scienceguy on May 2, 2008 at 6:21 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I agree that ChrisPia is going a little far afield on this one. But one has to ask why Sheriff Nash has not yet set up a system to identify the people whose money was unlawfully taken and to return it. According to past newspaper articles, he took money from some people and not others, sometimes took $15.00, sometimes took $10.00, sometimes used it for the prisoner's benefit, sometimes used it for Christmas bonuses...what a mess...

I comment because economics is "a social science." And logic--which is mathematically based--tells me that when there is money to be made because one lawyer has given bad advice (Nash's lawyer) other lawyers will be circling like vultures. (Please EXCUSE my typos, but I have no time for Spellcheck this morning.)

Posted by ChrisPia on May 2, 2008 at 8:22 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Creeker and Science guy....I did not impune the Officers. I stated they were ordered to do this when they received a phone call from????.
I do believe That If they questioned those orders they would have been fired.
Going far afield....LOL Please explain.
Is it Unbelievable to Think that this incident as well as many others by Ray Nash and his cronies are not Political?

Posted by scienceguy on May 2, 2008 at 10 a.m. (Suggest removal)

ChrisPia:

By "far afield" I mean that: (a.) you are often way off topic, (b.) you have lumped Rose supporters into a category with Nash and his supporters as if they are one and the same; and, (c.)in the process, you have implied that Mr. Rose and anyone who would support either him or Mr. Boatwright is a person of low ethics.

I think Mr. Limehouse and others not always discussed publicly have performed a public service by exposing some of the misdeeds of Sheriff Nash and ending his reign. And I doubt that this is the end of the story. But, your disputes and problesm with the Sheriff do not seem to figure much into the Audit Mess and the Inmate "Jail Fund" Mess. Consequently, your posts are being perceived by many of us as biased personal attacks.

Posted by ChrisPia on May 2, 2008 at 11:22 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Mr Rose is his own man. I have no problems with Mr Rose. I have pointed out some Questions that should be answered. It is a fact that some of the people in his campaign disclosure are Nash Supporters .That is a fact. These supporters have a deep animosity at the fact that Mr Scott pushed the audit and has made Nash resign from the upcoming Sheriffs race.(Probably with a promise not to prosecute him?)
Does Ray Nash have a history of setting up DUI checkpoints near political functions that don't coincide with his agenda,or against his opponent?(recidivism?
Does Ray Nash have a History of Punishing people for not following his political or religious agenda? and Lying?
Mr Rose has made some statements about Mr Scott prior to this happening about calling an officer for a friend of the family that was arrested , as well as after the arrest? Can He tell me who that source was?
Nobody has ever answered the questions of Who Made the Phone call to stop the car?
After the arrest Most people found out 2 days after the incident? How did Mr Rose get that info?
Research this Site http://www.jewsonfirst.org/airacademy.ht...
AfterReading That You Might Understand Why I Asked The questions Between Mr Rose and Mr Boatwrights affiliation?
Please Ask Mr Rose If They ever worked together or Worked on these allegations of Religious coercion? And then ask yourself How this may pertain to what is Happening in the DCSO with Nash and his BillGotard Principles?
Let's see what they say and then we will go from there?

Posted by ChrisPia on May 2, 2008 at 1:35 p.m. (Suggest removal)

http://www.truthout.org/cgi-bin/artman/e...

Posted by ChrisPia on May 2, 2008 at 1:38 p.m. (Suggest removal)

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/...

Posted by ChrisPia on May 2, 2008 at 1:46 p.m. (Suggest removal)

http://www.af.mil/pdf/HQ_Review_Group_Re...
Character training?

Posted by ChrisPia on May 2, 2008 at 1:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1...
Admission of Claims By Commander

Posted by scienceguy on May 2, 2008 at 2:25 p.m. (Suggest removal)

ChrisPia:

Mr. Rose sent a letter to the Summerville Journal Scene last week that may answer some of your questions. Again, however, the fact that you would think that he should address your questions on this forum suggests that you are more interested in slamming him than posing legitimate questions. Also, (again) the subject of Michael Rose is off-topic here. So, you have made my point.

I am not trying to attack you. But, just because someone supports two candidates does not mean, as you imply, that those candidates are connected.

Posted by ldd1 on May 2, 2008 at 2:55 p.m. (Suggest removal)

ChrisPia,It appears that you are in another rage today.Just read your last suggested attachments.None of them have anything to do with this article about the lawsuit over the fifteen dollars.What difference does it make where someone attends church?At least they are attending.

BTW,no one has forced Ray Nash to resign.Why would you indicate that Limehouse and Randy Scott could do something like that?Have you ever considered that this was a decission made because of personal or family issues?When Ray announced he would not run for office again he made the statement that when he became sheriff,the job was 90% law enforcement and 10% politices.Now that the job has become 90% politics,that changes the situation.Ray Nash is 100% law enforcement and zero political.So ChrisPia,why do you continue to say everything Ray does is for political reasons? Think you need to be cleaning up around your own political doorstep.

Posted by ChrisPia on May 2, 2008 at 3:23 p.m. (Suggest removal)

idd1.. This is really not about religion in what I am saying. My point is I don't care whom you worship or Not. I will defend that right. Once you Punish or retaliate or force your religion on a person in a Governmental setting. You are violating the law and the constitution....And sometimes God's law..
Scienceguy....Because of that letter that was written by Major Randy Ackerman of the Pentagon I became concerned.
There is a group in the Pentagon Called Christian Embassy.Chief Barnes I belive has a friend there.. I don't expect Mr Rose to answer my questions in a public setting or even at all. But Those are legitimate questions that I have a right to ask. If I am wrong I will Publically apologize for asking these questions to Mr Rose.

Posted by ChrisPia on May 2, 2008 at 3:35 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Hey scienceguy... Could this have been political without Mr Roses Knowledge?
Idd1... Ray Nash 100% Law enforcement and zero % Political.Wow!...It's a Political elected position and he has to answer for his mismanagement,If He doesn't like it he can always resign.......

Posted by ChrisPia on May 2, 2008 at 4:09 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Published Tuesday, April 15, 2008 3:19 PM
Updated Tuesday, April 15, 2008 3:20 PM

David Berman
Rose (right) verbally sparred with Scott (left) Saturday. David Berman
ScottScott, Rose trade barbs at GOP breakfast
By David Berman
Summerville Journal Scene

Breakfast was served with a side of political jabs Saturday as the two candidates for the State Senate’s 38th district questioned each other’s track records.

The sun had yet to climb very high by the time Republican Sen. Randy Scott and his Republican challenger, former state senator Mike Rose, squared off at Kelly’s BBQ restaurant near Summerville during the monthly meeting of the Lowcountry Conservative GOP Breakfast Club.

The candidates each spoke for an allotted time and also took questions from the audience.

Rose criticized the legislature’s excess spending. While touting his own fiscal responsibility, he attacked Scott for supporting earmarks and the state’s competitive grants program.

“In order to get $160,000, we had to pay $420,000 to other counties,” Rose said of the program, which he likened to a “slush fund.”

Scott, a first term incumbent, took the narrative approach as he spent a majority of his allotted 10 minutes talking about his background, his family and how he got into politics.

“I never told anybody I was a saint. I never told anybody I was the smartest guy in the world. But I can promise you this — I’ll work hard for you,” Scott said.

Scott did, however, manage to take at least two shots at Rose.

“He was there for 9½ years and he got defeated. I wonder why?” Scott asked rhetorically.

Later, Scott said: “I don’t understand why we’re having so many problems after my opponent spent 9½ years in the Senate.”

Scott left the Q&A session early, but not before a question from audience member Jim Emery, of Summerville, prompted one more verbal swipe by Rose.

Emery asked both candidates if they had ever used their political positions for special favors from magistrates or law enforcement officials.

Scott immediately interjected, saying the question was aimed at him. He said it had to do the accusation that he ordered the release of a friend’s son — who had just been arrested for driving under the influence — from police custody.

“He (the friend) merely called me to go check on him (the son) and see if he was alright,” Scott said.

Rose disagreed with Scott’s account.

“I’ve had a police official tell me eyeball to eyeball that what he did was obstruction of justice,” Rose said.

Contact David Berman at 873-9424 ext. 214 or dberman@journalscene.com

Posted by ChrisPia on May 2, 2008 at 4:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Visit honors sheriff

We are proud residents of Dorchester County and are honored that 12 police chiefs from Romania chose the Dorchester County Sheriff's Office as one of their four stops in the United States. Regardless of whether high-ranking law enforcement officials are foreign or domestic, they bring high honor to Sheriff Ray Nash and his department when they visit and study techniques and training.

Certainly, the chiefs wanted to visit a law enforcement agency that has a proven track record in preventing and solving of crimes.

According to recent FBI statistics, Dorchester County has 20 percent less violent crime than its two neighboring counties in the Lowcountry. Sheriff Ray Nash's department has a 92 percent rate for solving homicides. (The city of Charleston just announced that it was reopening 50 unsolved homicides.)

This is not only a tribute to Sheriff Nash and his well-trained and disciplined staff but to the Summerville Police Department and other municipal police departments in Dorchester County. Kudos also should go to the many Crime Watch groups in the communities, as well as the general population for their keen interest in and support for good law enforcement agencies.

We have notified Sheriff Nash that we would be happy to underwrite the cost of a luncheon for these distinguished visitors to eliminate any criticism or concern about the expenditure.

MYRON JOHNSON

Shaftesbury Lane

Summerville

JIM EMERY

High Bridge Road

Summerville

This is that post and courier article I was referring to.

Posted by ChrisPia on May 2, 2008 at 4:16 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Ron Turner, a Summerville real estate agent and mortgage broker who has been active in Nash's campaign, describes the sheriff as "a great cop" and "a man of great integrity." He says Nash's critics are just blowing matters out of proportion to gain political advantage.

"Anywhere you go and do a forensic audit, you're going to turn up crap," he says. "You have less than honest people all around you."

Feb 3,2008 By Glen Smith Nash Legacy One of Controversy and Concerns

Posted by ChrisPia on May 2, 2008 at 4:18 p.m. (Suggest removal)

"Of course I'm disappointed," said Ron Turner, a Summerville real estate agent and mortgage broker who has been active in Nash's campaign. "I was waiting for him to lead the charge so I could follow. I think he's a great cop. I really do."

Nash Planning to Retire By Dave Monday P&C Jan 30,2008

Posted by ChrisPia on May 2, 2008 at 4:24 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Summerville vote

There is less than a week until Summerville town elections. From articles in The Post and Courier, it is apparent everyone is trumpeting the cause of planned or controlled growth in Summerville and Dorchester counties.

A Dorchester County councilman has listed many of the innovative actions accomplished to control growth in the area. When read closely, it is, in reality, a litany of the items that have not been accomplished. Look around at the cars to the front, to rear and to the side of you to verify this. Consider the comments by Neal Peirce of the Citistates Group about the Summerville area having one of the most acute cases of growth overtaking school capacity he has seen. This gives even more credence to what has not happened.

The list of accomplishments did not include the Historic Overlay District ordinance being held in committee for more than a year or the recent inaction by County Council on the adequate facilities ordinance. County Council has not seen a development it did not love. Placing things in perspective, the annual $100 per unit impact fee council has imposed on developers would allow a couple a night out each year for dinner at a nice restaurant.

The mindset and inaction by Town Council to implement ordinances for planning and growth compound and solidify the inaction of County Council.

With the exception of Town Councilmen Howard Bridgman and Mike Dawson, the remaining "band of four" council members march in locked-step to approve as many developments as quickly as possible with no explanation for the urgency.

This leads to the Town Council election rhetoric. It is suddenly popular for those in the "band of four" to speak up for planned and controlled growth. One member has suddenly become so contrite as to admit a mistake made in regard to the Limehouse development. But when confronted in a recent council meeting about a motion to consider an adequate facilities ordinance, the "band of four" showed its displeasure and retreated into executive session.

On Tuesday, do not let the weather or traffic congestion deter you from going to the polls to select those council members who will work for us. Vote for those who are willing to relieve the oppressive cloud of uncontrolled growth with an atmosphere of planned and controlled growth.

James D. McGraw

104 Lucretia Lane

Summerville

Another P&C article Of Despice For Certain Council Members

Posted by ChrisPia on May 2, 2008 at 5:13 p.m. (Suggest removal)

QUARTERLY REPORTS
All candidates,committees and ballot measure committees must file a quarterly report covering from the last report through the end of the calendar quarter

January 10 (covers October 1 - December 31)

April 10 (covers January 1 - March 31)

July 10 (covers April 1 - June 30)

October 10 (covers July 1 - September 30)

Any Body Know Why Harry T. Boatwright hasn't filed yet?

Posted by ChrisPia on May 2, 2008 at 5:17 p.m. (Suggest removal)

ARTICLE 15.
PENALTIES

SECTION 8-13-1510. Penalty for late filing of or failure to file report or statement required by this chapter.
Except as otherwise specifically provided in this chapter, a person required to file a report or statement under this chapter who files a late statement or report or fails to file a required statement or report must be assessed a civil penalty as follows:

(1) a fine of one hundred dollars if the statement or report is not filed within five days after the established deadline provided by law in this chapter; or

(2) after notice has been given by certified or registered mail that a required statement or report has not been filed, a fine of ten dollars per day for the first ten days after notice has been given, and one hundred dollars for each additional calendar day in which the required statement is not filed.

SECTION 8-13-1520. Violation of chapter constitutes misdemeanor; violation not necessarily ethical infraction.
(A) Except as otherwise specifically provided in this chapter, a person who violates any provision of this chapter is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, must be fined not more than five thousand dollars or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.

(B) A person who violates any provision of this Article 13 is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, must be fined not more than five hundred percent of the amount of contributions or anything of value that should have been reported pursuant to the provisions of this Article 13 but not less than five thousand dollars or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.

(C) A violation of the provisions of this chapter does not necessarily subject a public official to the provisions of Section 8-13-560

Posted by scienceguy on May 3, 2008 at 4:33 a.m. (Suggest removal)

ChrisPia:

I think you are mixing apples and oranges.

Although, I have no dog in the race in SummervilLe Town elections, I think upon closer inspection you will see that Mr. Dawson and Mr. Bridgman, whom you seem to like, support an Adequate Facilities Ordinance. Mr. Rose and Ron Turner, whom you seem to dislike, also support the AFO. Mr. Scott, Mr. Hearn (who was on County Council when the Jail Mess started), and Ms. Annette Young also oppose the AFO.

Now you have me "off topic" and "mixing my metaphors." But, the point I am trying to make is that Rose and Nash are not marching in lockstep any more than Scott and Knight are marching in lockstep. I have friends in Summerville who plan to vote for Knight and Rose and (for that matter) Benji Lafond.

This will be my last post on this article.

Posted by ChrisPia on May 3, 2008 at 8:37 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I have never addressed the adequate facilities act. This is the first time hearing of it and some of the first names mentioned.
I have mentioned before that Impact fees are illegal. No Matter how you disguise the name. My Point was/and still Is;The politicians Know this,and when it is appealed in a court of law the taxpayers will be footing the legal bills....I agree we need better planning .What people don't Realize is that a moratorium really does not slow growth. During that period of time all the paperwork and stuff is still being done to build more. Once that moratorium is lifted.They will build. It's slows the process though. So planning should be of importance during this period.
Once again I understand that Mr Rose is a seperate person.I just had Legitimate questions. I respect Mr Rose as I respect Mr Scott. I do however think that Mr Scotts arrest was political.The upcoming days will prove my point. Email me