Portable DVD players to help tell Drayton Hall story

The Post and Courier
Thursday, March 20, 2008


One problem with understanding the centuries of rich history at Drayton Hall is that so much of it has disappeared: the gardens, the outbuildings, the slave cabins.

But today, thanks to a joint effort between the plantation house museum, The History Channel and the S.C. Department of Transportation, visitors to the Ashley River landmark may rent a portable DVD player with a professional, customized documentary that interprets the house and its grounds.

It's being billed as the first of its kind in the region.

"We're moving into new territories in the way to tell this story," Drayton Hall executive director George McDaniel said Wednesday. "Tour guides can't be everywhere, and we have this landscape with a remarkable story to tell."

The portable documentary is meant to be viewed at 11 different sites or stations on the live oak-dotted grounds. People can listen to as many or as few of the vignettes as they choose. Each lasts between two and 10 minutes.

Libby O'Connell, The History Channel's chief historian, said the network has helped produce about 60 documentaries for historic sites but none are interactive like this one.

"This is truly a pilot project. We want to see how this works," she said. "It works really well on a site like Drayton Hall because you have to use your imagination about what it would be like."

The documentary includes 18th- and 19th-century maps, drawings, old and new photographs and interviews with descendants of former slaves who worked there, as well as with the seventh generation of the Drayton family.

The project got a boost when the DOT's Enhancements Program chipped in $50,000, while most of the rest of the approximately $200,000 production cost was donated by the History Channel, said Craig Tuminaro, Drayton Hall's director of interpretation. The DVD player and disc cost $7 to rent; visitors can buy the disc for $25.

Reach Robert Behre at 937-5771 or at rbehre@post andcourier.com.



Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version   Add this

Notice about comments:
The Post and Courier is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. The Post and Courier does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our Web site.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Comments

This article has  1 comment(s)

Posted by strongjohn10856 on March 20, 2008 at 10:08 a.m. (Suggest removal)

It was probably an "Enhancement" grant, which is mostly Federal $s that can't be captured any other way. The idea is that transportation projects in the past have resulted in a lot of damage to community resources. Enhancement grants are intended in part, to redress or make up for some of those impacts. There is probably a transportation theme woven into the story line. (All guess work on my part.)




Sponsored Links