Summerville council kills development

By Dave Munday
The Post and Courier
Thursday, March 13, 2008



SUMMERVILLE — A 780-unit development almost got a stay of execution on a technicality Wednesday, to the obvious horror of the standing-room-only crowd who turned out to oppose it.

Council finally killed the plan for Pine Trace in an emotionally charged and often confusing meeting that gave Mayor Berlin Myers a workout pounding the gavel and kept the town attorney busy keeping everybody on track.

At the same meeting, an effort to renew the town's moratorium on new residential developments failed after the mayor was called on to cast the tie-breaking vote.

During public comments, residents who live near Pine Trace, which was planned off Miles Jamison Road, said they objected to the extra traffic and impact on schools. Developer Gordon Geer asked council to give him more time to try to overcome objections.

When the request to annex the land and approve the development agreement came up for action, nobody made a motion one way or another before Myers moved on to the next item. That meant the request failed but could be brought up in another meeting, Town Attorney Mark Stokes said. If council had voted against the motion, the developer would have had to wait a year and then start over, he said.

The majority of the audience was obviously not pleased with what happened, many grumbling loud enough to cause Myers to pound the gavel for quiet. Later in the meeting, Councilman Bob Jackson asked if he could amend the agenda to bring up Pine Trace again. Stokes said he could with a unanimous vote. All the councilmen backed his request.

This time Jackson made a motion to deny it. He said the issue was not Pine Trace in particular but that the town had too many houses on the books already, so it wouldn't do any good to make the developer "jump through more hoops" amending the plan.

Councilman Bob Flowers stirred up the audience again when he tried to amend the motion to send the project back to a committee for more study.

"Oh come on!" an audience member yelled, causing Myers to come down on the gavel again.

Ricky Waring backed Flowers' amendment, but Howard Bridgman, Aaron Brown and Mike Dawson joined Jackson to kill it. Then came the vote on the motion to deny Pine Trace. Flowers abstained; all the other councilmen backed Jackson's motion to kill it.

The audience erupted in cheers, and some stood up and started yelling, causing Myers to start pounding the gavel again.

Council split on the vote to renew the moratorium. Bridgman, Jackson and Dawson argued that the town needed to quit approving new developments until a better plan was in plan to control growth. Flowers, Waring and Brown voted against it.

Town Administrator Dennis Pieper asked Myers to break the tie. After several seconds of hesitation, Myers voted no.

Reach Dave Munday at 745-5862 or dmunday@post andcourier.com.

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Comments

theronce (anonymous) says...

I have never seen a town love traffic and uncontrolled growth so much.

March 13, 2008 at 8:53 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

carolinadude (anonymous) says...

Summervillians, wake up. This council still has a majority plus a mayor that favors unmanaged and unbridled growth. The residents of The Bridges had to stack council meetings the last couple of times in an effort block a developer from infringing upon their already inadequate local infrastructure. Three councilmen and the mayor are apparently still in favor of unbrideled and unmanaged growth. CITIZENS OF SUMMERVILLE, please step up and run against these officials who are "of the chamber, for the chamber and by the chamber". The chamber is not your friend.

March 13, 2008 at 8:56 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

outrage (anonymous) says...

Same thing in Mt. Pleasant - Build, buy land, build, tax, build etc.

March 13, 2008 at 9:03 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

carolinadude (anonymous) says...

This is the same "of the chamber for the chamber and by the chamber" council that refuses to pass an "adequate public facilities ordinance to require developers to insure adequate infrastructure concurrent with the develpment. It's also the same "of the chamber for the chamber and by the chamber" council that refuses to pass a lawful employment ordinance requiring employers to insure that their workers are not "illegal aliens". Summerville is being overrun by "illegal aliens". Just walk through any of the local walmarts, and it becomes obvious. People, WAKE UP AND ELECT COUNCILMEN AND A MAYOR THAT REPRESENTS WE THE PEOPLE!!!

March 13, 2008 at 9:03 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

ImplantedYankee (anonymous) says...

With so many existing homes on the market in this slowing market, why would we want to build more? We need to take a breather until there is actually demand for more homes, rather than continue to dilute the market. While this area has escaped some of the pain of the nation-wide housing crisis, we need to be proactive to stay ahead of it.

March 13, 2008 at 9:51 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

RTC (anonymous) says...

Implanted, that is so true. We are in such a housing slump right now that it is ludicrous to continue building.
There are several homes in my neighborhood that have been sitting on the market for months and one for over a year.
Some of the people need to move, because they are being transferred with their jobs. Most have had to resort to renting them out.
outrage, you have that right.

March 13, 2008 at 10:24 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

YankeeLady (anonymous) says...

Developer Gordon Geer? By any chance the same Gordon Geer who sits on the Charleston Planning Commission?????

March 13, 2008 at 9:57 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!

Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Thank you for your interest in this story. The comment thread for this article has been closed.



Most Popular

 

Sponsored Links