Another skirmish on tap in state's 'water war'
By Bo Petersen
GEORGETOWN — They dug a canal 27 miles through the swamp a half century ago to reach an inland river deep enough to supply fresh water for this saltwater city.
Last summer, that wasn't good enough.
The drought-plagued Pee Dee River ran so dry it no longer fed the canal's intake pumps. On the other end were the taps for 11,000 families and businesses.
"You couldn't even get a dredge to where we wanted to dredge. You couldn't float it in," said Reuben Williams, maintenance manager for International Paper, the company that built and operates IP Canal.
"We've been through drought before. We have never experienced that," said Lane Mixon, Georgetown Water Utilities department head.
That's the issue that confronts state legislators — minimum stream flow. How much water is enough to make sure it is still a stream? It's the latest skirmish in what is becoming South Carolina's own Western-style "water war."
The Senate Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee today will debate for a second time a proposed state water plan, a law that would create a permitting system and set withdrawal limits for most large surface water users. The limits potentially could be tightened in drought conditions, and those are fighting words.
The biggest water users — power plants, industries, water treatment plants, large farms — already have pushed to be exempt from the permits and limits. Now lobbyists for those interests are pushing for the law to mandate the smallest minimum flow possible in rivers, allowing as much water as possible to be withdrawn for their upstream uses.
Environmental advocates don't like it.
"It's outrageous. We need to see not what is the maximum amount of water we can take out, but how much should we be leaving in. The more you take out of the reservoir, the more often we'll be in drought conditions," said Gerrit Jobsis, Southeast conservation director for American Rivers.
Drought hangs over this battle like a cloud. Minimum flow became an issue across the Southeast in the aftermath of the severe 1998-2002 drought. South Carolina communities suffered when North Carolina lakes cut back releases on rivers the states share. Georgia became embroiled in legal battles with Alabama and Florida over their rivers.
Having a permit plan is pivotal to being able to work out river water-sharing agreements with neighboring states. It might be vital to winning South Carolina's water wars lawsuit against North Carolina over proposed withdrawals from the Catawba River, the upstream source of much of the Lowcountry's drinking water.
That suit is before the U.S. Supreme Court, and North Carolina is putting together its own plan.
Industries at first wanted to set minimum flows at the lowest historic flow over 10 years. Environmentalists said that's drought level, too low to keep a stream or its ecosystem healthy. After a contentious hearing, the Senate committee told the stakeholders to work out a compromise.
Industries now support adding 20 percent more flow. That's the level at which the environmental integrity of the stream would be maintained, said Marcia Purday, S.C. Chamber of Commerce communications vice president.
"That is an improvement. But it's what we call 'flat-lining' a river (maintaining a single water level). We wouldn't see the kind of natural, seasonal variability that makes a river healthy," Jobsis said.
Legislators say that without a compromise, the bill doesn't go anywhere this session.
"At the end of the day, that's what we're talking about, how much of the river are we leaving for the public and the ecosystem. You can't simply dry up a river," said Sen. Chip Campsen, R-Isle of Palms, a committee member.
Meanwhile, last summer International Paper used a last-ditch fix for the Georgetown canal, setting temporary pumps directly into the river. "Saved the day it did," said Mixon, the Georgetown water department head.
The intake was dredged and is again feeding the canal pumps. Rain is starting to fall. But another hot summer is coming, and North and South Carolina are still in a severe, year-long drought. Flow in the Pee Dee on South Carolina's coast depends in no small amount on water released from lakes in North Carolina.
At the IP Canal, pipes for the temporary pumps from the river are still in place.
Comments
theronce (anonymous) says...
We've got more than a few gallons of water off a little ways to the east.
March 13, 2008 at 8:40 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
babylon0071 (anonymous) says...
Living in the foothills of NC and being an avid paddler and enviromentalist, I have been studying many of the rivers here and we are at record low flows with very little help insight.
The Yadkin/PeeDee river basin is being taxed by all communities throughout the watershed and we must look at ways to conserve and protect this vital resource so that future generations can sustain themselves.
As communities grow along the Yadkin/PeeDee an even larger burden is placed on this watershed, local municipalities need to look at ways to conserve,educate and protect these vital resources.
We must remember that, "we have only borrowed this land from our children"!
Brian
Winston Salem, NC
March 16, 2008 at 4:20 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
WSM (anonymous) says...
There is a rather huge water source right beside Beaufort, Charleston, Georgetown, and Myrtle Beach...it's called the Atlantic Ocean.
This is one of the prices we pay for attracting residents: everyone wants a piece of our bountful natural resources and climate. Like everything, there's ALWAYS a cost. Now, we're paying for it by ignoring water as a critical issue for development, assuming that river draws and deep wells will be the answer as it is cheap and an "easy fix." Thing is, we stuck with the easy fix, ignoring the growing migration of people from Northern states who want to move here.
In typical "half-*** measures" fashion that we are so famous for, we now have a problem.
Other countries have managed to do desalinization for potable water, why can't we?
http://www.freedrinkingwater.com/wate...
October 15, 2008 at 11 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Read our full Terms and Conditions.
Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!
Thank you for your interest in this story. The comment thread for this article has been closed.
- Most Commented
- Most Emailed
- Shared
- Upper King on rise: Hotels, apartments, restaurants changing face of downtown area
- UPDATE: Missing woman's fiance seen leaving scene of burned SUV, carrying a shovel
- Missing woman case gets murkier
- Magnolia Gardens offering free dream wedding to contest winner
- Body of missing woman's fiance was found near handgun
- Pinterest: Pinning hopes and dreams
- DAVID SLADE: S.C. offers hybrid car tax credit
- Black women today: Strong. Resilient. Ambitious.
- Ex-Boeing worker claims racism, retaliation in firing
- MCDERMOTT COLUMN: Golf business has risks, rewards




