Connect with us:   Subscribe to the paper  |   View the mobile edition  |   Get daily e-mail news  |   Get mobile alerts  |   Share your photos  |   Report news  |   Place an ad  |   Contact us


Harmony Hall still not completely settled

The Post and Courier
Friday, March 7, 2008


While the controversial Harmony Hall sale was pending, state Rep. Chip Limehouse was hesitant to discuss how much his family's real estate company would make from the $10 million land deal.

But after the sellers refused to pay what he claimed they owed, he had no choice but to go to court and disclose his earnings on the sale.

Limehouse, R-Charleston, and his family's company, Limehouse Properties, were recently awarded a $300,000 default judgment for the unpaid portion of his $500,000 commission on selling Harmony Hall, a future Charleston County park.

Harmony Hall's sellers, however, claim they are caught in "a case of greed and deception."

Limehouse Properties sued Toogoodoo Plantation in November, two months after the county's Park and Recreation Commission paid $10 million for the 434 acres in Meggett.

The park agency's deal drew much criticism: some questioned the level of secrecy with negotiations, the short time that the sellers owned the land, the price tag, the site's proximity to other county parks and the fact that the state lawmaker's family-owned business brokered the deal.

In Limehouse Properties' lawsuit, the company claimed the owners of Toogoodoo Plantation, Peter and Susan Stanley, had a written agreement to pay a commission of a half a million dollars for Harmony Hall's sale. But the Stanleys paid only $200,000 in September, according to court documents. A circuit court judge found the real estate company was entitled to the full commission.



Read more in Saturday's edition of The Post and Courier.




Article tools




Latest local stories





Sponsored Links


Notice about comments:
Charleston.net is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Charleston.net does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not charleston.net. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Comments

This article has  0 comment(s)


(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Search Charleston.Net Archives for Latest News


Charleston.Net Customer Care | Subscribe to Paper, Register for email news updates, manage your online account, place a classified ad, or contact us




Charleston.net logo

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 the Evening Post Publishing Co.

Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of service, Privacy policy and our Parental consent form. (Updated 2/9/2007)