Proposal: Let drivers know who's new on the roadBy Yvonne Wenger (Contact)
The Post and Courier
Wednesday, June 18, 2008
COLUMBIA — One Summerville woman presented a simple idea to a local legislator to try to make Charleston-area roads a little safer. Bette Century Thomas contacted Rep. Joe Daning, R-Goose Creek, this week with an idea for potential legislation that could offer new drivers incentives for labeling their vehicles to let other drivers know they're inexperienced. Century Thomas said she came up with the idea after 15-year-old driver Cushire Akabidavis and her mother, Christina, were killed in May along Interstate 26. Cushire Akabidavis was leaving the state Department of Motor Vehicles office in Ladson after just receiving her learner's permit. Daning said he likes the idea but there are a lot of details left to work out. Rusty Hires, president and CEO of Rusty's Driving School, doesn't think labeling new drivers is such a good idea. For more on the story, read tomorrow's editions of The Post and Courier. |
Article toolsSponsored Links |
|
Notice about comments: Charleston.net is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Charleston.net does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not charleston.net. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Full terms and conditions can be read here. |
Comments
This article has 12 comment(s)
Posted by a_set_love on June 18, 2008 at 3:45 p.m. (Suggest removal)
A large red L on the front and back of the car.
Posted by Girleygirl on June 18, 2008 at 3:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)
LOL...
Posted by letstakeawalk on June 18, 2008 at 4:44 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I agree with a_set_love's suggestion. The "Learner" designation is used in the United Kingdom. New drivers (and everyone else) would also benefit greatly from an expanded skills test for new drivers. Currently, the hardest part seems to be making the 3-point turn. If the test were more rigorous, and dealt with real-life emergency situations like emergency stops around pylons or recovering from spins, new drivers would be vastly better prepared to drive safely. The Germans also have an excellent driver-training system.
Posted by coolfreaknbeans on June 18, 2008 at 5:16 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I'm with you allwoman.What are we supposed to do?Oh crap theres an inexperienced driver!Pull off of the road..look ouuuuuttt!All this would do is get the new driver flipped off and laughed at more.It'd be like a dunce cap for a car.
Posted by keepinitreal on June 18, 2008 at 5:50 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Every driver in America needs a label once in a while: even experienced drivers. Speeders, traffic weavers, no turn/lane change signals......the list of labels could go from A-Z.
Posted by letstakeawalk on June 18, 2008 at 5:57 p.m. (Suggest removal)
@ coolfreaknbeans
Your comment only adds to the perception of automobile drivers as arrogant and only concerned with their own well being. A Learner tag would simply notify other drivers that the new driver might not do what they are expected to do - meaning that more experienced drivers could better comprehend why the learning driver is taking so much time pulling into traffic or other (generally frustrating) behaviors that timid drivers exhibit. The tag should ease road rage, rather than provoke it.
Posted by Thomas1776 on June 18, 2008 at 7:45 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Yeah .... Why not do this same thing for people who have gotten speeding tickets, been arrested for DUI, criminal domestic violence, bad checks, littering, etc? We can make such a law retroactive back to the beginning of time.
But seriously, these people advocating for this are ignorant of Constitutional and Civil Rights law. This is just another example as to why SC is last in just about everything; stupid people.
Posted by coolfreaknbeans on June 18, 2008 at 7:45 p.m. (Suggest removal)
My point was that generally the inexperienced drivers are the ones screwing up.I again agree with allwoman-this in no way wouldve helped Cushire Akabidavis and her mother.A car label doesnt prevent you from making bad judgement calls.It would simply warn others that youre libel to f up at any given moment.And if "the new driver might not do what they are expected to do.." they have no damn business driving!!
Posted by Pluffmuddy on June 18, 2008 at 10:31 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Hey, I have a novel idea! Why not keep your inexperienced butt out of rush-hour traffic until you're capable of handling it??? What's more, why not get that phone out of your ear and concentrate on driving defensively instead of being a moving target and a hazard to everyone else???
Posted by letstakeawalk on June 18, 2008 at 10:36 p.m. (Suggest removal)
@thomas1776
You seem really offended by the idea that it might be helpful to know which drivers are at the beginning of the learning curve - that's fine. But what makes it a Constitutional or civil rights matter?
Rereading the article - I do have a serious problem with "incentives" given for displaying such an identifying mark. However, I still think that a "Learner" marking is a reasonable idea for all new drivers.
Posted by CaptPete on June 18, 2008 at 10:44 p.m. (Suggest removal)
What a dumb idea. Go ahead and target a parent's auto for a auto insurance scam artist staging a wreck. The new driver would be set up by running into this person who is looking for a payout.
Posted by goosecreek_guy on June 18, 2008 at 10:49 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Interesting suggestion... I would have a problem with offering incentives for doing this. I don't think that a label is the most appropriate measure to make driving on our roadways safer, but I do agree that driver training and testing be more stringent. We cannot call on nor demand that our government be babysitters. I completely agree that new drivers with little to no experience should not drive anywhere near rush hour/ heavy traffic.