Dorchester County gives estimates on tax increase
SUMMERVILLE — Business owners and landlords will see a 5.4 percent jump in their tax bills this fall because of the Dorchester District 2 school budget increase that County Council approved last week.
County administrator Jason Ward calculated two examples Monday to show what the tax increase means.
--The owner of a $250,000 commercial property (at a 10.5 percent tax rate) will pay an extra $223.13.
--A landlord renting out a $250,000 house (6 percent tax rate) will pay an extra $127.50.
Council approved the commercial tax increase to give the schools an extra $1.8 million. But most business owners still don't know what the tax increase means yet.
"I've been getting calls from business owners but have not been able to tell them," Council Chairman Larry Hargett said Monday.
The budget leaves the school district $1 million short of what officials were asking for. The district will probably borrow the money from its reserve fund to make up the difference, Superintendent Joe Pye told the school board Monday night. That makes him uncomfortable, he said, because it would take the balance down to about 8 percent of the annual budget, or one month's operating expenses.
"We're not going to cut any programs," Pye said. "We're not going to abandon our kids."
The tax increase might indicate it's time for the state Legislature to re-evaluate how schools are funded under the state law that was passed last year, according to Sean Bennett, vice chairman for public policy for the Greater Summerville Dorchester County Chamber of Commerce. Now officials are forced to look to businesses instead of residential property owners for school money, he said.
How much a 5.4 percent tax increase hurts a business depends on the profit margins, but most businesses will pass on the increase to the consumer, Bennett said. For instance, the landlord whose tax bill goes up $120 a year might raise the rent $10 a month.
"Ultimately, it always comes back to the consumer," Bennett said.
Reach Dave Munday at 745-5862 or dmunday@postandcourier.com.
Notice about comments:
The Post and Courier is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. The Post and Courier does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our Web site.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.
Comments
This article has 3 comment(s)

Posted by Slick50 on June 10, 2008 at 4:34 a.m. (Suggest removal)
"Ultimately, it always comes back to the consumer"
Wink. Wink. The citizens of Dorchester County will pretend it never happened.
Posted by theronce on June 10, 2008 at 8:01 a.m. (Suggest removal)
OK, kiddies, listen up. What's the difference between our property tax system to finance government and the feudal system of the European Middle Ages? Ans: not dang much.
Posted by drp7773 on June 10, 2008 at 11:25 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Just goes to show you, live in Dorchester county you get raped and they dont even kiss ya......This county has had the biggest growth for how many years, high dollar subdivisions, business's and they have the balls to say they need more money..they still build 1 story schools and before it's finished being built they say its not big enough so they want to buy more land and build again. Same ole BS