Report on S.C. State funds gets 2nd look
Solicitor Pascoe: 'No timetable' for decision
By Diane Knich
Previous story
Schools act as money funnelsPublished June 1, 2008
First Circuit Solicitor David Pascoe says he's reviewing a report from the State Ethics Commission on the "misuse of public funds" at South Carolina State University, but he's not yet sure if or when he'll bring charges against anyone involved.
Pascoe would not say specifically what was included in the report.
He said, "I'm taking a second look (at the report). There could be something here."
Pascoe said he met with Herb Hayden, executive director of the State Ethics Commission, late last week to discuss the report, which Hayden had passed on to him. Since then, Pascoe said, "I've conducted an initial review and made personal findings."
But, Pascoe said, he has "no timetable" for a decision.
Hayden also said he would not comment about the details of the report. But, Pascoe said, the commission received anonymously a report from an audit that was conducted at the university at the request of former President Andrew Hugine.
The university's Board of Trustees voted in December not to renew Hugine's contract.
Hayden said the audit report raised questions about "activity in the finance department." He also said "select individuals were targets of the investigation."
Hugine could not be reached for comment Monday.
Maurice Washington, whose term as chairman of S.C. State's board ends June 30, said he was aware the commission was investigating activities at the university.
University officials conducted an internal audit, the report from which was presented to the board in spring 2007, Washington said.
The audit report "alleged inappropriate activities by an employee who is no longer employed by South Carolina State University," he said.
In December, he said, in the midst of controversy over the board's decision on Hugine, someone gave the audit report to the State Ethics Commission.
The commission has been investigating the matter since January, Washington said. The university cooperated with the commission and "will fully cooperate with the Solicitor's office," he said.
Reach Diane Knich at 937-5491 or dknich@postandcourier.com.
Comments
BillytheKid (anonymous) says...
Nobody, in office, gets caught in SC.
June 3, 2008 at 4:01 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
zoomru (anonymous) says...
Isn't CLYBURN Jr. from that district?? No Legislator is making prime time lip service out of this? This is UNBELIEVABLE !!! No one has any GUTS??? Sounds like they are going to pull a RILEY and wait a year for some report??
June 3, 2008 at 1:35 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
ChrisPia (anonymous) says...
David Pascoe Did such a Great job with Ray Nash/DCSO Fiasco,I would say nothing will be done.
June 3, 2008 at 3:17 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
scienceguy (anonymous) says...
Isn't Pascoe's primary job to prosecute cases not investigate them? Isn't it the job of SLED to investigate this type of alleged crime?
From the looks of things in the DCSO, the Dochester County Auditor's Office, the Dorchester County Treasurer's Office, and the Dorchester County School District, if Pascoe spent any part of his time investigating crime, he wouldn't have time to prosecute crime.
June 3, 2008 at 8 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
thebull (anonymous) says...
Mr. Pascoe, you have my sympathy. Dorchester government has enough crooks for you to have to keep in check, but now I see you have to deal with the same issues in Orangeburg. Scienceguy is right. Where is SLED?
June 3, 2008 at 10:36 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!
Full terms and conditions can be read here.
Thank you for your interest in this story. The comment thread for this article has been closed.
- Most Commented
- Most Emailed
- S.C. losing port traffic to other states
- Out with old ...
- Cart gives Buddy new lease on life
- Water — 'The smell is gone'
- Schools plan to update visitor-security system
- GenPhar site 'red-tagged'
- Off campus
- Historic manor house used by Girl Scouts is among buildings that might be torn down to make way for future
- Man, 17, killed in motorcycle wreck
- Tough times have taught comedian's sister to love life
