Panel off to slow start in school funds debate

By Yvonne Wenger
The Post and Courier
Wednesday, July 23, 2008



COLUMBIA — Legislators procrastinated Tuesday instead of getting down to work rewriting the state education funding formula, although members of a study committee refocused efforts on the dividing issue.

Historically, the Legislature has not made progress in changing the way South Carolina pays to educate children because a new formula will only redivide the same dollars, and no one wants to go home with less money.

"It would be my recommendation we grab a big, white, blank sheet of paper," House Majority Leader Jim Merrill of Daniel Island said to his colleagues on the Education Finance Act Study Committee.

Merrill said the committee was "chasing our tail" after members spent more than an hour laying out philosophical agendas and getting sidetracked on issues such as offering better incentives to teachers.

Merrill said it was time for legislators to put proposals on the table.

From the start, though, Rep. Jeff Duncan, a Laurens Republican and committee chairman, said it was going to be tough to bring all the sides together and deal with the high-stakes problems that also call things such as equity and South Carolina's competitiveness into the mix.

"One thing I have sensed is how monumental and overwhelming this task is. It is Herculean, really," Duncan said when preparing for the meeting.

Duncan said some of the keys to reform will be giving school districts flexibility to design programs, handing over more local control on revenue and looking at funding schools on a per-child basis. Also, he said, the committee could investigate whether to fund education 100 percent by the state, eliminating the 30 percent local contribution.

Rep. Annette Young, R-Summerville, bristled at the suggestion. To do that, she said, would mean a tax increase.

Duncan asked the committee to meet every two weeks through the end of November when House Speaker Bobby Harrell called for the committee to release a report about its findings and recommendations before the start of the 2009 session.

The matter is so complex and so important that Duncan said he is not sure the committee will be able to come to any conclusions. The House committee has been meeting since December 2007 and has been collecting testimony up to this point.

During the next meeting, scheduled for Aug. 5, Duncan said he would bring the first proposal and encouraged the committee members to do the same.

A similar effort in the Senate is scheduled to resume next month. That panel has been meeting since June 2006 with no proposed solutions.

Reach Yvonne Wenger at 803-799-9051 or ywenger@postandcourier.com.

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Comments

lou9 (anonymous) says...

Assign a dollar figure per pupil statewide regardless of where they live, raise the sales tax another 1 or 2 percent and let the state take over fully funding education. They can't do much worse than these tax and waste school districts. Let the dollars assigned to the student go with him/her regardless of whether they go to private, public, or home school. Breaking up the monopoly that public education has on our tax dollars will make them have to improve instead of giving excuses and raising taxes.

July 23, 2008 at 10:03 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!

Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Thank you for your interest in this story. The comment thread for this article has been closed.



Most Popular

 

Sponsored Links