School finance on state's agenda
Lawmakers tackle outdated formula's reform
The Post and Courier
Tuesday, July 22, 2008
COLUMBIA — More than 30 years have passed since the state designed its plan to fund education, and now it is simply no longer working. Two factors are forcing lawmakers to touch this political hot potato for the first time in decades: --Tax reform in 2006 that swapped sales tax for property tax funding makes the Education Finance Act obsolete. --At the same time, fast-growing districts — often South Carolina's best schools — are facing deficits from the burden of so many new students and few alternatives to raise cash. The fight will pit urban and rural lawmakers from wealthy and poor areas and challenge the Lowcountry and Upstate power structures. In the middle: one single pot of money that will mean winners and losers. The goal is for legislators to work out potential solutions this summer and fall so the debate can begin at the start of the Legislature's two-year session in January. Three efforts are under way, one in the House, another in the Senate and a third in the state Department of Education. The House Education Finance Act Study Committee meets today to start drafting a report due in November that will serve as a basis for bills legislators could introduce as solutions to fix the funding problems. Many lawmakers and leaders have spoken on the need for reform in the funding formula, including state education Superintendent Jim Rex, House Speaker Bobby Harrell and outgoing Rep. Bill Cotty, a Columbia Republican who had previously served eight years on the Richland 2 school board. Cotty, a member of the House study committee, said the public needs to demand change. He also called on political leaders such as Harrell and Senate President Pro Tem Glenn McConnell, both Charleston Republicans, to shepherd it through. Statesmen are needed to guide the reform effort as legislators will fight for what's best in individual districts, not the state as a whole, Cotty said. "When I see all the greed and the give-me-for-nothing, and 'I want more' and 'I don't care about your county, I got my problems' — then right now, for the short term, I myself am a pessimist about it," Cotty said. Cotty also emphasized that any reform must include changes to the taxing system. "None of that happens with the same or less dollars," Cotty said. Education spending is the state's largest budgetary item, totaling approximately $3.3 billion for public schools. That figure includes state revenue and lottery funds. The Education Finance Act measures the taxing ability of each county based on its appraised property. That means wealthier districts such as Charleston County get less money. Legislators, though, regularly pass stopgap measures to send more money to districts punished by the formula. As education costs rise and the economy sinks, finding millions more to shift to certain districts is taking more political capital than ever.
Diette Courrégé contributed to this report. Reach Yvonne Wenger at 803-799-9051 or ywenger@postandcourier.com.
|
Posted by lou9 on July 22, 2008 at 10:32 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Oh, boo hoo. The poor school districts can't screw the homeowners like they used to. Now they actually have to watch what they spend instead of raising taxes. They can still cut out a lot of administrative fat, like superintendent's bloated salaries. And manditory pay increases. I haven't had a pay increase from my employer in six years. I have had to make do with what I get. They are just going to have to learn to do the same.
Here's an idea - raise the sales tax another 1 or 2 percent, let the state determine a per pupil dollar figure regardless of where they live, and let the state fully fund education. Take these worthless school boards out of the taxing business altogether. Let the money assigned to the student go with him/her to whatever school their parents decide to send them, whether it is public or private. Public education will not get better unless it faces some competition. Charter schools are a good first step, but all options need to be put on the table.
Posted by RW on July 23, 2008 at 10:16 a.m. (Suggest removal)
School Vouchers! Some districts are just better places to live. No one wants their kids in a cesspool rural school if they can help it. How about privatization? Private schools are far better than public schools!