Ga., S.C. close to sealing deal on shared cargo terminal
Historically port rivals, South Carolina and Georgia are one step closer to sharing a massive marine cargo terminal proposed for Jasper County.
The Georgia Ports Authority board of directors on Monday approved the nearly $7.6 million acquisition of more than 1,500 acres for the Savannah River development. The S.C. State Ports Authority board is expected to approve a similar resolution when it meets today.
Officials lauded the future terminal, which is an estimated 10 years away from completion, as a boon for international trade.
Though the land is in South Carolina, it is owned by Georgia's Department of Transportation. The two state ports authorities together will pay $5,000 per acre in a transfer that could be finalized as early as July 28.
In addition to settling disagreements with Georgia, the SPA also had to resolve a long-standing legal battle with Jasper County, which wanted to create its own port on the property.
Jasper County Administrator Andrew Fulghum welcomed this week's developments.
"Now we can put our attention toward planning infrastructures," he said.
Fulghum cited a 2001 study showing that a terminal could create more than 8,500 jobs and add more than $186 million in total personal income in
Jasper upon opening. Once it becomes completely operational it could create nearly 98,000 jobs and more than $2 billion in total personal income for both South Carolina and Georgia, Fulghum said.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers currently uses the property for dredge disposal. Once the property changes hands, the next steps include conducting environmental assessments and feasibility studies.
A group called the Jasper Ocean Terminal Joint Project Office was formed to move the project forward after the states agreed to work together late last year. The project office will eventually produce a bi-state compact, which will address financing and operations and will be subject to approval by the legislatures in both states and the U.S. Congress.
Reach Allyson Bird at 937-5594 or abird@postandcourier.com.
Notice about comments:
The Post and Courier is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. The Post and Courier does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our Web site.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.
Comments
This article has 3 comment(s)

Posted by palmettotree on July 15, 2008 at 7:10 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Too bad it will take 10 years to open. the port sure can use it now. They should have had Daniel's Island. Mayor Riley and Ravenel can go jump off a short pier... As you can tell I am still ticked by that. Think of all the jobs that were lost here in the area and the state because of money hungry people.
Posted by algorelost on July 15, 2008 at 8:49 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Never get built. GPA is in the process of spending 1 billion dollars on their terminal in savannah over the next 6 years. I doubt they want a new terminal to compete with that any time soon.
Posted by RTC on July 15, 2008 at 9:16 a.m. (Suggest removal)
palmettotree, so right you are. The Daniel Island terminal would have also removed approximately 60% of the truck traffic by the use of railines.