Drug reps to face new restrictions on gifts, meals

Marley Seaman
Associated Press
Sunday, July 13, 2008


— Drug company sales representatives will have to stop doling out coffee mugs and pens that push their products when they visit doctor's offices. But they can still sneak in the occasional free lunch.

Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America announced late last week that it has revised its conduct code for interacting with health care professionals. The updated guidelines ban the knicknacks bearing company and product logos.

Sales representatives are prohibited from providing restaurant meals and entertainment or recreation. But they can still provide the occasional, modest meal in a health-care professional's office "in conjunction with informational presentations," according to a statement from PhRMA.

The updated code also emphasizes that drug companies should separate any funding they provide for continuing medical education from their sales and marketing departments. It notes that the funding should support education "on a full range of treatment options and not to promote a particular medicine."

PhRMA said meetings between sales representatives and doctors should be focused on informing health care professionals about products, sharing scientific and educational information and supporting research and education.

The new rules take effect Jan. 1.

The association represents pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies and is made up of executives from companies in the industry. Its CEO, Billy Tauzin, said he hopes the code additions will create "more credible" standards for doctor-sales rep interactions.

"I don't think you'll find a physician who will acknowledge that the gift of a pen or a cup with a company's name on it influences their prescribing patterns," he said. "But there are people who believe that, and as long as that's a perception out there we felt we ought to end that."

Tauzin said his association got conflicting reactions from doctors about whether to eliminate the free lunches, but he noted doctors are free to stop the meals themselves.

The trade association said in January that it was considering revisions to its 2002 code. Its executives said then that they've seen a backlash over sales and marketing practices.

Critics of these sales practices have included the nonprofit organization No Free Lunch, which is run by a New York-based internist. It urges medical school students to pledge that they'll shun free gifts or meals from the drug industry.

No Free Lunch also promotes a pen amnesty program on its Web site, where it offers to replace with "no questions asked" drug company pens that doctors receive. It states that the pens will be "donated to a worthwhile cause."

Sen. Herbert Kohl, D-Wisc., said in a statement that he was "encouraged by the industry's attempt to clean up its act." Kohl co-sponsored the Physician Payments Sunshine Act to create a national registry for payments doctors take from companies.

Dr. Brian Hurley, president of the American Medical Student Association, said the new rules are an improvement but they don't go far enough. He said gifts given to doctors as educational materials or occasional meals are still gifts. "Aggressive" marketing practices have made drug companies a lot of money, he said, and they have little incentive to stop those tactics.

"Educational gifts or educational programming that pharma's member companies put together are marketing in disguise," he said.

Members of PhRMA are required to state their intention to comply with the code, and Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Amgen Inc., Eli Lilly & Co. AstraZeneca PLC and EMD Serono were among the companies that did so Thursday.

AstraZeneca said its U.S. representatives will not give doctors items including pens, pads of paper, hand soap and tissues as part of sales visits. The company said its sales representatives will still be able to offer educational items like teaching models if they "are not of substantial value."

AstraZeneca said it will still support medical events for health care professionals through grants to independent providers, and the British company says it will not give any guidance about the content or faculty of those events and will provide no direct support for meals.

Lilly said in a separate statement that it will comply with or exceed the new guidelines. It said the revised code will help ensure "the information exchange with healthcare providers continues to be appropriate and ethical."

Tom Murphy of the Associated Press contributed to this report.

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Comments

blues101 (anonymous) says...

i have seen drug company reps at a doctor's office on occasion,while i sat in the waiting room - peddling their wares like the old-time Medicine Man going fron town to town peddling linaments and tonics. I also know that some doctors prescribe the "suggested" drugs and don't seem to know a lot about them or the side effects or bother knowing about it unless you ask. I, for one, would love to see a sunshine act allowing a public view of the payments doctors take from the drug companies. You might want to know just how much your MD is persuaded to prescribe one drug over another or a generic.

July 13, 2008 at 7:34 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

gamecockdoc (anonymous) says...

I, for one, know exactly what I am prescribing and I don't know of any doctor that really takes into account the "studies" demonstrated by these sales reps when they do come in. I prescribe based off independent studies, ie studies not funded by that company, and double blind studies that 99% of the time have more reliable results. I've never prescribed a medication simply because someone gave me a coffee mug or brought in a sub sandwich for the office.

July 13, 2008 at 8:58 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

NativeSC (anonymous) says...

Yeah, but I bet you ate the sandwich and took the mug. I love how these self righteous doctors act like they are so above it all. Doctors are some of the cheapest SOBs I have ever seen and when they need something, a textbook, a new piece of equipment, free samples for their "indigent patients"(this means themselves, parents, in-laws, neighbors, etc) they will damn sure take it. Why do you think these practices perpetuate to the point where they had to be banned. This wasn't a one sided transaction. Do you really think drug companies would fund meals, trips, golf, and gifts if no one was taking them. Puhlease, how hypocritical for doctors to act like they haven't played an integral role in this problem. What a joke.

July 13, 2008 at 9:53 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

farfallaspeaks (anonymous) says...

Legal drug pushers.

gamecockdoc, i should certainly hope you know what you're prescribing. I wouldn't be to proud of that statement. That's like a Chef proudly saying he knows what his spices taste like before putting them in people's food.

Coffee cups and pens make doctors remember the name, just like any other marketing merchandise.

July 13, 2008 at 10:40 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

gamecockdoc (anonymous) says...

My statement was in response to the first post implying doctors simply push medications based solely on what benefits they get. Nothing can be farther from the truth. I love how the public thinks all we do is look down our noses at them. Are there a few bad apples, sure. Are there some doctors that prescribe based on what company calls on them...I'm sure there are but you can't lump all of us in there with them. I for one can't stand sales reps. All they are doing is selling a drug so I don't listen to them. I read the studies (NOT their studies) to make my decision. I love how you act as if we condone these acts. If you think your doctor is prescribing a medication for you based on the fact that he/she got a ball point pen....may i suggest you find another doctor.

July 14, 2008 at 11:10 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

gamecockdoc (anonymous) says...

also, regarding payment by a company. Any time a doctor is paid by a company whether it is to make a lecture or as a consultant, we are ethically required to release that information. I have NEVER heard of any doctor receiving money for prescribing a medication. Never. And, if you are so curious, ask them the next time you see them rather than posting here. Put your money where your mouth is.

July 14, 2008 at 11:14 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

NativeSC (anonymous) says...

I, for one, can't stand doctors. All they are worried about is their reimbursement, whether you have insurance, and making sure you know that payment is expected when services are rendered. You must be real smart not listening to the information someone is giving you about a product. But hey, you're a doctor, you know everything. And if you have enough free time to keep up with everything on your own, you must not have many patients to see. Either way, I am sure the drug reps could care less.

July 14, 2008 at 10:32 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

gamecockdoc (anonymous) says...

You know why we make sure you know payment is expected at time services are rendered....because its people like you that expect insurance to pay for everything and complain about a $15 copay that is an agreement YOU have with YOUR insurance and you don't know anything about the coverage you have so you complain about everything. People...health care is a service that the public needs but for most it is also business. When you go out to dinner, are you expected to pay at the end of the meal? I think so.

Am I busy...yes. Do I have time to read and study everything...no but you know what, I have to make time because that is the business I've chosen and I have to stay on top of new treatments. So, do I listen to reps say, sure but with a grain of salt because again, they are pushing their drug over another drug regardless if it works better or not.

July 15, 2008 at 8:38 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!

Full terms and conditions can be read here.




.Link.