Sullivan's Is. cites owner of tree firm

The Post and Courier
Saturday, July 12, 2008


SULLIVAN'S ISLAND — The owner of a tree company has been cited for using heavy equipment on sand dunes after an investigation into illegally cut trees.

David Christmas, of North Charleston, the owner of Arborscape Tree Preservation, is scheduled to appear in the town's magistrate court Aug. 12.

Christmas received the citations after the Charleston County Sheriff's Office looked into hardwood trees disappearing from Sullivan's Island's public land, 90 acres of beach that has built up gradually over time.

The Sheriff's Office conducted the investigation because 21 trees were cut down in February. That's the same time that three public officials hired Arborscape to make legal cuts to various bushes and shrubs.

Arborscape employees denied removing any of the hardwood trees and said they didn't know who did.

According to the violation, Arborscape employees drove a tracked vehicle onto the dunes to remove the debris, which isn't legal.

The three public officials, Jerry Kaynard, town councilman; Nicky Bluestein, planning commission member; and Pat Ilderton, design review board chairman, told investigators that they didn't realize that several 20- to 30-foot cedar and willow trees haddisappeared from the protected land, between their Atlantic Avenue homes and the ocean.

The town allows property owners to hire licensed contractors to trim wax myrtle, eastern baccharis shrubs and the popcorn trees to 5 feet with a permit.

Violators can be fined $500 and sentenced to 30 days in jail per tree or shrub.

Randy Robinson, a Sullivan's Island building official, and the island's tree consultant, Jeff Jackson, agreed that the cuts to the cedars and willows were not similar to those on legally cut shrubs, according to a letter written to Town Administrator Andy Benke.

Robinson also found a blade in a willow that typically wouldn't have been used by a professional, he wrote.

Town Prosecutor John Dodds III advised Sullivan's officials in a letter that without an eyewitness or other direct evidence, there was no legal basis for issuing any other fines.

Kaynard said he has several trees in his yard that he enjoys and wouldn't want anyone to cut them.

"I know I didn't cut any trees and I want anyone who did to be prosecuted," he said.

He said he plans to recommend strengthening the protective tree ordinance and to suggest monitoring the areas when trimming takes place.

Ilderton and Bluestein could not be reached for comment.

If Christmas is found guilty of the equipment violations, he could be fined $1,035 for each home, and the $5,000 bonds posted by each of the homeowners could be forfeited.



Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version   Add this

Notice about comments:
The Post and Courier is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. The Post and Courier does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our Web site.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Comments

This article has  2 comment(s)

Posted by PalmettoHawk on July 12, 2008 at 9:38 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Must have been using "stealth" chain saws when whomever fell the trees for no one to have heard anyone working in the area. No witnesses, no hard evidence, not guilty.



Posted by Eye_on_You on July 12, 2008 at 9:44 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Palmettohwak, That's right speed but don't get caught, so not guilty? Where are you from?