Town of James Island perseveres through creative budgeting

The Post and Courier
Friday, July 11, 2008



Photo of Brian Hicks

You've got to hand it to officials in the "town" of James Island.

Even though they're living under the constant threat of having their city dissolved by court order, they have managed to pass another operating budget. And it is nothing if not the model of thrift.

For a town of about 20,000-odd people, the Jim Isle budget is just shy of $3.5 million.

What's most amazing is that the town does this without a property tax on its residents. How, you might ask, do they do that?

Well, they mostly let other people pay for it.

See, $1.1 million of that money is from local option sales tax money. That's a program that gives a portion of sales taxes back to the place where they are collected. But the deal is that more than three-quarters of that money is supposed to be dedicated to lowering property taxes. Jim Isle gets that money without even having a property tax — pretty fancy. And also technically illegal. To top it off, by taking that money, everybody else in the county gets less.

But so far the Legislature has let them get away with it.

You know, the Legislature — those lovable public officials in Columbia who changed state law to allow James Island to jump marshes and bodies of water to incorporate their city. And even though the courts have twice ruled their actions unconstitutional, lawmakers did this tremendous favor for James Island a third time.

Those state legislators sure are nice guys. And their charity doesn't stop there. A few years ago there was this state law that required a minimum amount of police protection for a city — two officers per 1,000 residents.

The Charleston County Sheriff's Office was graciously willing to provide that police protection — even though most towns have to pay to have deputies in their towns — but could only dedicate about two-thirds of the force required. It looked like Jim was going to have to pay for 13 more cops.

But that would require a property tax, so James Island got the Legislature to change that law, too. Man, that was lucky.

The state also ponies up most of the $1 million in grants the town gets to pay its expenses, even though most public officials will tell you that using un-guaranteed, one-time funds for operating money is poor fiscal practice.

And then there's an additional $350,000 that comes from state aid to subdivisions or shared local government funds. In other words, tax money from everyone in the state. The town itself generates $160,000 in business licensing and $120,000 in building permit fees and another $10,000 in interest — money earned using other people's tax money.

Wouldn't it be great if we could all live in such an inexpensive civic Eden — or, as some conservative folk might call it, a welfare state?

In South Carolina, most municipalities the same size as James Island have much larger budgets: Greenwood is around $12 million, roughly the same for Orangeburg. Myrtle Beach, which has only a few thousand more residents, has about a $100 million budget.

But for James Island, where the livin's easy, $3.4 million will do it. Of course, since they have a Public Service District that provides water and fire protection — you know, city things — Jim Islanders do pay property taxes. In fact, they pay about the same as Charleston's city tax rate, but they set up this town so they wouldn't have to join Charleston. This isn't about saving money, folks there say, it's about local control. They don't want to be annexed into the city. They want to take care of their own business — well, contract it out. One person's local control is another's added layer of bureaucracy.

So you see, it's easy to have a town budget of less than $3.5 million if the town doesn't have its own fire department or police department, or provide water, trash pick-up or sewers — in other words, all the things a town is supposed to do. It's hard to imagine a judge finding something screwy with this deal for a third time.

It is just good, sound fiscal management, and everybody else in South Carolina has got to hand it to them.

Their operating budget, that is.

Reach Brian Hicks at 937-5561 or bhicks@postandcourier.com

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Comments

yeahright (anonymous) says...

"public officials in Columbia who changed state law to allow James Island to jump marshes and bodies of water to incorporate their city"

How did Charleston incorporate parts of James Island, which is obviously on the other side of the harbor, if this state law prohibited jumping marsh and bodies of water?

July 11, 2008 at 3:17 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Fire_Inspector (anonymous) says...

Maybe, just maybe, the people of James Island don't want Joe Riley and his inept crew of cronies runnning the services there.

You know, incompetent fire chiefs

Aggressively unstable police chiefs.

Etc. If you don't live on the lower peninsula, all you get from Charleston is a chance to subsidize the richies.

You know the ones. The ones from out of town that only live here part time...

July 11, 2008 at 4:26 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

ZUMAN (anonymous) says...

'Cuz the land under the water between Charleston and Jim Isle was not incorporated, thus allowing the annexation. Same law applied when Chas. annexed Daniel Island. The "changed law" now allows towns that want to incorporate to ignore land under water (or marshes) that is already incorporated. In this case, Charleston. No other state in the union would have allowed this but leave it to good 'ole SC.

July 11, 2008 at 4:29 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

yeahright (anonymous) says...

Thanks for the answer, but I'm still a bit confused. Does that mean that the Stono River is incorporated into the city of Charleston because a small portion of Johns Island is incorporated into Charleston?

July 11, 2008 at 5:37 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

STREETLAW (anonymous) says...

This is the beginning of a study of what a Mayor makes in towns about the size of James Island. James Island may leech from its neighbors, and the Mayor's salary would seem to be excessive given the number of employees, but like they use to say in Vaudeville, you ain't seen nothing yet. James Island continues to represent government of, by and for the few, and they will surely take care of each other and their minions.

(unfortunately the P&C has not provided a way to include tables so you will have to spread this data out as best you can)

Pop Employees Mayor's Salary

Aiken 25000 343 + 123 temps $15017
Goose Creek 29000 190 + 25 $30000
Greenwood 22000 185 $ 9600
James Island 22000 5 $35000

Other comparably sized towns in SC

Anderson 25000 400
Florence 30000
Myrtle Beach 23000
Summerville 28000
Myrtle Beach 23000
Summerville 28000

July 12, 2008 at 12:10 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

allaneddie (anonymous) says...

As though taxpayers everywhere don't pay for "city things" that others use. Have you ever heard of CARTA?

July 14, 2008 at 11:12 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

beersnob (anonymous) says...

My home town was incorporated to prevent (further) annexation by the adjacent city. It has been a big success with the exceptions of uncontrolled sprawl and poorly planned roads. It's success was only made possible by a large and ever-expanding tax base and a great deal of tourist dollars, federal inputs, and money generated by local industries. JI has got none of this and never will have it. With all due antipathy for Mayor Riley and the City, the incorporation of ToJI was ill-conceived and is just not feasible.

January 6, 2009 at 1:56 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!

Full terms and conditions can be read here.




.Link.