Gator-hunting bill crawls past panel

The Post and Courier
Wednesday, January 30, 2008


COLUMBIA — Gator hunting might begin this fall, if state lawmakers swallow legislation allowing some alligators to be shot without being tied off first.

A House bill on Tuesday cleared the committee where it stalled in the last session, a delay that angered some lawmakers.

The hunting bill now carries a controversial amendment to allow private owners of large tracts to shoot the reptiles, then go after them. That's in contrast to the proposed hunting permit for individual hunters, which requires tying off the alligator with a line before it is killed.

Rep. David Umphlett, R-Moncks Corner, added the amendment to help large property owners control the number of gators. Sen. Larry Grooms, R-Bonneau, who has pushed for the hunting season, said he favors Umphlett's amendment, but if it puts the bill in jeopardy, he'd want to move forward without it.

Removing alligators

Private Lands Permit (proposed):

-- Issued Sept. 1 through Oct. 15 to owners of 100 acres or more.

-- Includes the use of firearms on swimming or basking alligators.

-- Limited to alligators 4 feet or longer.

-- Requires tagging and reporting kills.

Hunting Permit (proposed):

-- Second Saturday in September to second Saturday in October.

-- Limited to alligators 4 feet or longer.

-- Does not allow shooting of unsecured alligators even on private land.

-- Requires tagging and reporting.

-- Limited number issued by lottery.

Nuisance Alligator Program:

-- Year-long.

-- Seldom includes firearms.

-- Requires tagging and reporting.

-- Designed to remove alligators that are a threat to property owners.

The legislation was spurred by reports of a large and growing number of alligators at lakes Marion and Moultrie and the Cooper River. The state Department of Natural Resources estimates that more than 100,000 alligators now roam the South Carolina coast. Waterway residents say it might be far more. Controlling the population became an urgent issue last summer when a Summerville man lost his arm to an alligator while snorkeling in Lake Moultrie.

The amendment would allow owners of 100 acres of property or more to shoot alligators in their rice paddies and other wetland areas along the waterways. It limits them to a season similar to the hunting season, requires permits and requires the owners to retrieve the alligator, tag and report it, Umphlett said.

But it takes a precise shot to kill an alligator, and the idea of shooting an alligator that hasn't been snared disturbed Ron Russell, of Gator Getter Consultants, a licensed nuisance-alligator harvester.

"Anybody who hunts alligators knows recovering a free, unshot alligator in the water is difficult at best. It's tough to recover some alligators with lines attached," he said. "An alligator just doesn't stop moving. Even shot on a bank, they'll crawl off in the water. They're pretty incredible when it comes to their survivability. It's not that hard to get a line on an alligator."

Natural Resources worked with legislators to craft the amendment, said Derrell Shipes, wildlife project chief. "There's a greater concern for safety on public waters. We're going to urge these people to be very careful, and we're going to monitor it."

Grooms said the private land provision was spurred by plantation owners who said they can't get rid of enough problem alligators with nuisance permits and worry that the proposed hunting season won't provide enough permits to do it. Under the bill, a limited number of hunting permits would be distributed by lottery.

The bill was held in the House Agriculture and Natural Resources committee, apparently a victim of wrangling over the proposed Interstate 73. But committee Chairman William Witherspoon, R-Horry, said his hesitation to move the bill was the same as Natural Resources' — he did not want hunters using firearms on public lands.

Witherspoon wants to make sure the public realizes an alligator hunter must have experience. "I don't want anyone to get hurt."

The bill could be debated on the House floor as early as Thursday, he said, and he expects broad support. It would go back to the Senate for a vote.

Reach Bo Petersen at 745-5852 or bpetersen@postandcourier.com. Reach Yvonne Wenger at ywenger@postandcourier.com or 803-799-9051.

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Comments

Hey_U_Guys (anonymous) says...

Gator hunting? Holy Hell. Any excuse for a redneck to use a gun... UNLESS they are trying to attack you, these creatures should be left alone. Just like any other animal. Hunting is wrong unless you eat all of the meat and use the skins for something. Don't hunt for the "thrill".

January 30, 2008 at 7:32 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Hey_U_Guys (anonymous) says...

We're over populated. Lets go ahead and start killing eachother to control our population. North Charleston has the right idea.

ANd to answer your question, I don't know what hunters are called up north.

January 30, 2008 at 9 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

kma71 (anonymous) says...

They're called rednecks too. Just ask anybody from the U.P. of Michigan.

January 30, 2008 at 9:27 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Lakeuser (anonymous) says...

The SCDNR has allowed the gator population to get out of control. They should have been looking at a way of removal years ago; need balance.

Would you allow a Mountain Lion to roam your subdivision ?

The "SCDNR" needs to be held accountable!

January 30, 2008 at 9:35 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

JohnS (anonymous) says...

Shooting on the public water. That's all you need to be awaken or have your house hit by a high powered rifle by some drunks out on the water at night. There is enough wildlife to hunt without adding the old gator.

January 30, 2008 at 4:50 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!

Full terms and conditions can be read here.




.Link.