Fellow judges deny Kosko a new term

Charleston law school founder accused of derogatory remarks

By Glenn Smith
The Post and Courier
Wednesday, January 23, 2008



U.S. Magistrate Judge George Kosko, a founder of the Charleston School of Law, remained mum Tuesday on reports that he had been passed over for reappointment after being accused of making disparaging comments about women and Asians.

The state's federal judges met behind closed doors in Columbia on Friday and decided against reappointing Kosko to another eight-year term on the bench, The State newspaper reported, citing unnamed sources. While reappointment is never a given, it is unusual for a sitting magistrate to be brushed aside, area attorneys said.

No formal announcement has been made about Kosko. Chief Judge David Norton of Charleston reportedly presided over Friday's meeting, but he has not disclosed its results. He did not return a call placed to his office Tuesday.

Kosko also did not return calls to his Charleston office.

Federal Clerk of Court Larry Propes attended Friday's meeting but said he was not at liberty to discuss what occurred. "Hopefully, there will be some public announcement made in the very near future," he said.

Kosko, a 1971 graduate of the University of South Carolina School of Law, was appointed to the federal bench in 2000 after 25 years in private practice.

He earned a reputation for a gruff, no-nonsense manner on the bench. In June, for instance, Kosko raised eyebrows when he issued this warning to jailed economist Al Parish at a bail hearing: "Mr. Parish, if you plan to abscond, then you can plan for your mother to live in a cardboard box under the railroad tracks for the rest of her life."

In South Carolina, magistrate judges serve eight-year terms. They are appointed by U.S. district judges, who hold life terms. Among other things, magistrate judges conduct bail hearings and pretrial criminal proceedings.

The State reported that a magistrate's screening committee recommended against Kosko's reappointment after investigating allegations that he had made inappropriate comments.

Cherie W. Blackburn, a Charleston attorney who chaired the committee, declined to discuss specifics Tuesday but called the process "a fair one."

The Rev. Rob Dewey, a committee member and senior chaplain with Coastal Crisis Chaplaincy, also declined to discuss details of Kosko's case. But he said the panel undertook its work with "the utmost seriousness."

"We met two times and struggled with the information we were provided with," he said. "And as the decision was made, we lost sleep, because it was a difficult decision."

Kosko was one of five founders of the Charleston School of Law, which opened in fall 2004. He was a shareholder in the private school, a member of the advisory board and an adjunct faculty member.

Alex Sanders, another of the school's founders, called it "very unfortunate" that Kosko wasn't reappointed but predicted it would have no effect on the law school.

Diane Knich and Schuyler Kropf contributed to this story. Reach Glenn Smith at 937-5556 or gsmith@postandcourier.com.

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Add this

Comments

lillycollette (anonymous) says...

Maybe a clean-up of that tax absurdity A/K/A/ Family Court (famine court) is actually possible!

January 23, 2008 at 5:27 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

charleston32 (anonymous) says...

People like this don't deserve to work in courts or law schools. My hat's off to the district court judges and review panel for their hard work and in doing the right thing.

January 23, 2008 at 8:39 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

hillbilly (anonymous) says...

Congratulations, Glenn Smith.
Another story slolen from the State Newspaper.
Maybe this expose will win you a coveted investigative award.

January 23, 2008 at 11:44 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

eyfigueroa (anonymous) says...

scary early, you seem to be reading my mind. talking about gaping holes in a story! i can honestly say i don't know what the heck went on.

January 23, 2008 at 2:23 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Tulane75 (anonymous) says...

I dispute PalmettoMan's assertion that the transcripts are manipulated. I call him out on that one, which is an insult to every court reporter I know.

Also, I don't think the judge said anything improper to Mr. Parish and he certainly made the necessary point. I have no problem with a defendant understanding that if he absconds, his surety will lose big. If mom puts up the house, then that's what she will lose.

January 23, 2008 at 6:14 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Read our full Terms and Conditions.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!

Thank you for your interest in this story. The comment thread for this article has been closed.


 

Most Popular

 

Sponsored Links