Give Senator John McCain the S.C. victory he deserves

Thursday, January 17, 2008


Eight years ago we urged voters in South Carolina's Republican presidential primary to support John McCain. His record since then has left us even more convinced that the Arizona senator should be the 2008 Republican presidential nominee.

Not only has the senator continued to live up to the "straight talk" theme of both campaigns, he has provided the country with positive leadership in critical areas. Well known for an independent streak that has led to deviations from the party line, John McCain mainly reflects mainstream conservative values, as evidenced by his calls for less government regulation and a reduction of federal spending, his opposition to tax hikes, his advocacy of Social Security and Medicare reform, his push for an overhaul of the tax code, and his support for a strong defense.

It is in the latter area that the senator, a former Naval aviator who survived more than five years in captivity in Vietnam, where he suffered physical and mental torture, has been the most effective. His was the knowledgeable voice that got the administration's and nation's attention when he spoke out on what was going wrong with the war in Iraq. He also was among the earliest and most steadfast supporters of Gen. David Petraeus' successful 'surge' strategy.

Never one to duck the tough issues, Sen. McCain has taken the lead on a reasonable solution to the illegal immigration dilemma, which he described to us in a recent interview as one of the most heartfelt emotional issues he has dealt with in his 26 years in Congress. His state is among the most adversely impacted, and he knows better than most the need to secure the borders before any new reform legislation goes into effect. He believes the failure to seal the borders as promised in connection with the discredited 1986 immigrant reform effort is at the root of much of the current public frustration.

While political hay can be made by calling for the blanket deportation of the estimated 12 million illegal immigrants in this country, that's unrealistic. The senator's more sensible approach calls for deporting the estimated 2 million who have committed crimes while in this country. The remaining 10 million would be punished through fines, required to learn English and to get in line for citizenship behind all others who are here legally. He makes the irrefutable point that it is the federal government's failure to act that is giving the illegal immigrants de facto amnesty.

The McCain spur to congressional action on immigration and other critical issues would be the power of presidential persuasion coupled with his willingness to use his bully pulpit to "call the names" of those who refuse to come to the table. He would preface negotiations, he said, by offering to give all the credit to those willing to work toward a solution. "Politicians," he reminded us, "crave approval." He's also ready to play tough with those who refuse to cooperate by "telling the American people" who "won't sit down with me." That's the kind of straight talk a lot of politicians in Washington would be loath for their constituents to hear.

In fact, the senator clearly feels regular communication with the American people has been sorely lacking. He pledges press conferences at least once every two weeks and also said he would go on television once a week — even if only C-SPAN would cover it — to update the American people "on what's happened where our young people are in harm's way."

In terms of national defense, what he describes as the 'war against radical extremism' would never be far from his thoughts. While he believes al-Qaida is on the run, "it is by no means defeated," and Iraq will continue to be the central battleground. He is encouraged by signs that there is an increased recognition around the world about the nature of the struggle, and he is well equipped to make America's case in the international arena. Certainly as the victim of vicious torture at the hands of the enemy, there is no one more credible to reassure this country and the world "that we will never torture another person in American custody."

He has equal credibility on the domestic side, particularly for his opposition to wasteful spending in general and, specifically, such hot-button, pork-barrel earmarks as a $230 million Alaskan "bridge to nowhere."

The senator notes that he has never asked for an earmark for his state in all his years in Congress and rightly believes that public disenchantment with his party is due to the level of pork-barrel spending that occurred on the Republican watch. He pledges to veto every single piece of legislation that contains an earmark.

What's more, he will make sure the American public knows about such earmarks as the $3 million allocation to study the DNA of bears in Montana and promises to do so with a bit of "good natured" chiding, much in the style of his mentor, Ronald Reagan. We could use more of that kind of humor in Washington.

The 71-year-old senator's also willing to poke a little fun at himself, momentarily pretending to doze off, for example, when the media ask age-related questions, including whether he would be too old to withstand the rigors of being president. In a serious vein he points to the energy level he has displayed during the debates and campaign, noting that age questions should be balanced with those of judgment and experience.

He notes that in the eight years since he first ran, America has been attacked and currently is engaged in two wars. He rightly points out that this is no time for "on the job training."

John McCain correctly gauges the nation's thirst for a problem solver who can cross party lines. He points to Sen. Joe Lieberman's endorsement of him in New Hampshire on national security issues, despite differences on domestic issues, as a "singular" moment in that campaign and as evidence of his ability to attract independent and Democratic votes.

On Saturday, South Carolina voters will once more have the chance to give him the boost he needs to be the Republican nominee in November. Of all the contenders in that primary, he has the best chance of forming bipartisan coalitions to solve this nation's domestic problems and the most credibility and experience in international affairs.

For the good of the country, give tried and trustworthy Sen. John McCain the chance to be president with a much-deserved S.C. Republican primary victory.



Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version   Add this

Notice about comments:
The Post and Courier is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. The Post and Courier does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our Web site.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Comments

This article has  9 comment(s)

Posted by webwe on January 17, 2008 at 11:20 a.m. (Suggest removal)

McCain is a good fellow but he also carries a lot of baggage – the could be a repeat of the ’64 Goldwater debacle.



Posted by cainhoyboy on January 17, 2008 at 12:29 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I had to laugh when I saw this editorial this morning. It must be so hard for the Post and Courier staff to try and appear neutral in a predominantly conservative town. When you come out with an endorsement for McCain, it shows your true stripes. Of course your for McCain. All good liberals want McCain to represent the GOP.



Posted by rshank on January 17, 2008 at 6:24 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I can not believe the Post and Courier would endorse McCain. He is nothing more than a big business puppet. With him we will be the United States of Mexico in no time and a greater disgrace to the world. Shame on you !



Posted by corvette on January 18, 2008 at 5:30 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Excellent endorsement! I couldn’t agree more!
Let me add a couple of numbers: 82 = John McCain’s lifetime conservative ACU voting record. 9 = John McCain’s lifetime liberal ADA voting record. He is – and has always been – a solid conservative.
Here are some more numbers: 21% = Obama’s lead over Romney in RealClearPolitics.com’s national average; 11% = Hillary’s lead over Romney. 6% = Hillary’s lead over Huckabee; 13% = Obama’s lead over Huckabee. In contrast 4% is McCain’s lead over Hillary and 2% McCain’s lead over Obama. John McCain is the only Republican who can win the swing state independents who are going to decide the election in November.
Saturday is our best chance to make a difference by voting for a stand-up leader who will put Washington on the right track.



Posted by littlehouse on January 18, 2008 at 10:43 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Visualize a New Day:

http://i251.photobucket.com/albums/gg312...



Posted by cmon on January 18, 2008 at 10:53 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Answer: NO. NO. NO. (and NO!)

Reasons:
1. McCain attacks free speech (McCain-Feingold).
2. McCain condones law-breaking (McCain-Kennedy).
3. McCain punishes industry (McCain-Lieberman).
4. McCain sucks up to trial lawyers (McCain-Kennedy-Edwards).
5....etc. McCain only sponsors bills with leftist Democrats--NEVER conservatives.

We're supposed to believe McCain is conservative? Puhhhhhhhhh-LEEEEEZZZZZ!!!



Posted by johnForgesKerry on January 19, 2008 at 7:07 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Dear Sir,

I see you like John McCain. So I assume, you recommend him over Clinton, Obama and Edwards? Is that correct?

Thank you,

Lu, Kang Sung
US Citizen
Japan



Posted by HATFIELD on January 19, 2008 at 8:43 a.m. (Suggest removal)

THANK YOU once again for reminding me why I don;t subscribe to your ultra-liberal rag. To suggest that you know who republicans should vote for (McCain, who has the the same views as Hillary) is way out there. You are supposed to be a non-biased news organization. Try reporting the news w/out your liberal bias, it might be a refreshing change of pace. Where is the article about Romney or Thompson who actually hold to conservative beliefs(unlike McCain or Huckabee)?



Posted by thurin on January 21, 2008 at 5:10 p.m. (Suggest removal)

i wonder if anyone is curious as to why a liberal entity would be concerned about Republican interests so as to advise republicans on whom to vote for? I know i am curious. McCain deserves nothing. He has shown no inclination for conservative ideals which most Republicans hold dear. Just because he is wearing the Republican name to run under does not make him republican. i start to wonder about McCain when he is getting the backing of a liberal entity. It is the same thing as in the 04 Presidential Elections when the terrorsts were advising us to vote for Kerry. Do we reallly want to listen to someone who has no concern at heart for our interests and our ideals? I do not. and, since my 'enemy' is advising us to vote for McCain, that is reason enough to not vote for him. If McCain ever embraced the Conservative ideals of my party, he then, might be worthy of my vote. I also know if McCain ever embraced the ideals of Conservatism, his stature of 'Media Darling' would end and the MSM would stop talking about him, in short, they woudl ignore him, which is probably the best thing that could happen to a conservative nominee for the Republican Party. So, since i am not a 'mind-numbed robot' at least not a liberal one, i must keep on looking for my political advisor :) i certainlyl won't find it in this publication




Sponsored Links