Assistant solicitor arrested
Motorist says Ervin pointed gun at her
Motorist says Ervin pointed gun at her
William Grayson Ervin
MOUNT PLEASANT — A rookie solicitor was arrested Friday and accused of pointing a loaded gun during a road rage incident on the Arthur Ravenel Jr. Bridge.
Ninth Circuit Assistant Solicitor William Grayson Ervin, 29, of Charleston is charged with pointing and presenting a firearm, Solicitor Scarlett Wilson said.
A woman driving toward Mount Pleasant on the bridge about 2:50 p.m. reported that a man behind her was trying to get around but couldn't. When he finally passed, he pointed the barrel of his black handgun at her, Mount Pleasant police Lt. Sean Kenneally said.
The 44-year-old Mount Pleasant woman called police and reported the man, gave a description of the vehicle and a license plate number, Kenneally said. He said an officer spotted Ervin's GMC Yukon heading north on U.S. Highway 17 near the Brickyard Plantation community and stopped him.
Kenneally said police found a loaded Glock Model 27, .40-caliber handgun in the sport utility vehicle. There was no round in the chamber, he said.
Ervin gave a different version of events than the woman. He told police that there was a man in the passenger seat of the other car and that the man showed a gun, Kenneally said.
"So he showed his," the lieutenant said, adding that Ervin denied pointing the gun.
The woman told police she was alone.
Wilson said she had not spoken to Ervin but she will fire him when she does.
"He is no longer employed," Wilson said.
Solicitor and police alike said that whether another person showed his gun first was not an issue. It's illegal in South Carolina to show a firearm.
"The way to handle situations like that is not with violence or the threat of violence," Wilson said. "You do what the woman did. You call the police."
Ervin is expected to have a bond hearing this morning. Police weren't sure if he was the registered owner of the gun or if he had a concealed weapons permit. Wilson said Ervin formerly worked for law enforcement in the Myrtle Beach area.
Ervin graduated from the Charleston School of Law in the spring of 2007 and served as a law clerk for the Solicitor's Office for about three years while he attended school, Wilson said. She said she hired him as assistant solicitor late last summer, when he passed the bar exam.
Schuyler Kropf contributed to this report.
Reach Nadine Parks at nparks@postandcourier.com or 937-5573.
E-mail this story
Printer-friendly version
Comments
yeahright (anonymous) says...
This guy's judgement is no better than the thugs the solicitor's office prosecutes. Let's hope he suffers the consequences he deserves.
February 16, 2008 at 1:10 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
lillycollette (anonymous) says...
I fail to see how Ms. Scarlett Wilson is a joke in this instance. She immediately took the proper action.
February 16, 2008 at 2:44 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
MotoryachtSoCo (anonymous) says...
I'd laugh if it wasn't so sad.
But it is Absolutely Shocking!
More Commentary at:
http://cedarposts.blogspot.com
Thanks SCgal for the heads up
Lilly the fact that she immediately took action is part of the why she's a joke.
February 16, 2008 at 3:13 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
lillycollette (anonymous) says...
MotoryachtSoCo said: "Lilly the fact that she immediately took action is part of the why she's a joke."
There must be a communication meltdown here. I even looked at http://cedarposts.blogspot.com and I still don't get it despite my well-known brusque sense of humor.
The only jokes I see in reading posted comments about Scarlett Wilson are where supporters of Blair Jennings are grasping at straws to attack Wilson. If there are specifics against Wilson would you please let me in on it before the election?
February 16, 2008 at 4:29 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
ForPnC (anonymous) says...
I'm sick of people like this guy. Just because you have a gun you don't have the right to wave it around. It doesn't make you a man or braver than anyone else.
Take away his right to own firearms. He apparently doesn't know how to handle them and will most likely never have the mental capacity to learn. He makes gun owners look bad.
February 16, 2008 at 5:14 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
skeeter (anonymous) says...
I take it there's a job opening in the solicitor's office.
February 16, 2008 at 5:47 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
SCgal (anonymous) says...
I take it there's a job opening in the solicitor's office.
Perhaps Jennings was a team player afterall!
Will wait and see how this one unfolds~ should be interesting!
February 16, 2008 at 6:15 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
SCgal (anonymous) says...
And a Glock Model 27, .40-caliber handgun at that!
February 16, 2008 at 6:17 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
moonpie (anonymous) says...
Dumb ass rouge ex cop. Did he have a permit to carry? I seemed to have missed that, if not then that too is against the law.
Sounds a lot like the idiot that ran for CofC mayor's spot?
February 16, 2008 at 6:27 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
MotoryachtSoCo (anonymous) says...
I'm still in shock! I think I'll go run my lab along the battery and have another cup of coffee.
February 16, 2008 at 7:33 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
missy_lynch (anonymous) says...
Hey, it's Mt.(UN)Pleasant, what do you expect? The very reason I got the hell out of there!
February 16, 2008 at 7:53 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
MAJMike (anonymous) says...
I hope Mrs. Wilson pursues the same sentence as the kids from I'On that pointed the BB gun. 10 years Mrs. Wilson we will accept nothing less. William Grayson Ervin invest in some soap on a rope you will need it.
February 16, 2008 at 8:11 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
rdrv22 (anonymous) says...
I agree, ForPnC, his right to own a gun should be taken away. People like this guy that besmirch the second amendment. That being said, people in the cult of Mt. P. drive like idiots everyday and should be kept in check, but ROGUEs that think they are big men with big guns should not be the ones to do it. Maybe if we all carried painball guns in our cars and shot the poor drivers' cars, everyone else would be able to tell who the idiots were and steer clear of them... just a thought.
(Yes that's right the correct spelling is ROGUE. Watch a little X-men every now and again, okay? We wouldn't want people to think our dear friend Grayson wears makeup now would we?)
February 16, 2008 at 9:02 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
RTC (anonymous) says...
Could it be that he was commissioned to carry due to his position or as an ex LEO?
Doesn't matter one way or the other, because the guy was just flat out wrong.
I have seen this a-hole around, but never knew who he was.
I'm glad that I do now, so I can avoid him. What a big man you are to point your big, bad gun at a lady driving all by herself.
rdrv22- Don't group everyone from the same area together, okay? Idiots are everywhere on the road.
February 16, 2008 at 9:21 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
PnCoccasionalreader (anonymous) says...
I know Gray personally. He's generally a nice guy. While we don't have all the facts, it's most likely that he has made a terrible mistake.
Gray is a hard working person. He has dedicated himself to law enforcement and public service. If the article is accurate, he has shown very poor judgment. Hasn't everyone done this at one point or another? Everyone makes mistakes. Everyone.
As far as Solicitor Wilson . . . Shouldn't she wait for the outcome of a trial? I don't want my solicitor to jump to conclusions concerning the guilt of an accused person. I do expect my solicitor to prosecute those that violate the law throughly and dutifully, but within the confines of the system they have sworn to uphold. Does public reprimand of an employee while not having even spoken to him personally meet our collective sense of justice?
If the article is right, Gray is clearly wrong. It also looks like he's lost his job. It looks like he may face a sentence of some sort. He has already been publicly humiliated. Do you really want to try him on this comment/posting board as well? He should be punished if he is wrong but we have a system for that. Stone throwers on electronic posting forums are not part of that system, at least not the last time I checked.
February 16, 2008 at 9:22 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
chance78 (anonymous) says...
Lillycollete -
Since you ask for more information on Scarlett Wilson, I feel a duty comply for you and others.
In a short time in office Mrs. Wilson's work history has been nothing short of amazing.
1. She's vastly improved the relationship between prosecutors and law enforcement, to the unanimous approval of almost every agency (CPD, Mt. P, CCSO)in our jurisdiction.
2. She's made serious efforts, with mixed results (from the bench), to revoke bonds on repeat offenders and get violent offenders off the street while awaiting trial.
3. She's vastly reformed the lines of communication between the prosecutors' office and the county clerk of court to insure public records are quick and accurate and put an end to long running internecine fued between the two public agencies.
4. She promptly addressed the murder back log she inherited in office to a stunning degree of success. I believe there were 7 or 8 murder trials in 2007 (with about 60 awaiting trial) - so far in 2008 there have already been 5 murder trials, all convictions.
In short, Lilly, in a very short term in office, she has made amazing strides to fix the issues so often complained about on this board.
February 16, 2008 at 9:26 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
chance78 (anonymous) says...
So who on earth would oppose this? Aren't these good things? The answer is yes to all but all but one group. The private defense bar makes a living off the inefficiency, ineptitude, and good ole boy connections of our S.C. system. They're terrified at these changes. Accordingly, they have presented a perfect puppet candidate in Blair Jennings, a man (though a decent person I hear) who has very personal connections with several of our city's most prominent defense attorneys. This is not some crazy conspricay theory - it is documented fact.
A prosecutors job involves making tough decisions. By thier very nature - you are not going to agree with every decision the office makes, but the community should expect the decisions to be made promptly and fairly, and most importantly - independently and bravely (no matter the political pressure).
Ms. Wilson bore the brunt of criticism for a recent decision on Wando robbers, but she made the call that no one else wanted to make (and I would add, on a case she could have easily postponed until after the election if she was more concerned with political fallout and had no integrity).
What was Mr. Jennings response to this case - "I don't have all the facts to say whether I approve, or disapprove, or her decisions" - I'll leave the call up to you - is that a prosecutor or politician?
This inicident with the rookie prosecutor and the gun is appalling, but Ms. Wilson is acting promptly and fairly and is about as much to blame as that Ashley High principal is for that teachers DUI last week (not at all).
Do not be fooled by the transparent people on this board whose obvious agenda is to get their good old connected friend elected. For the next 6 months they be on here turning any article about crime or prosecution into a ball drop by Ms. Wilson. It is deeply saddening.
This summer we have a choice between a prosecutor and a slick politician for this important office. I certainly hope it turns out one way (try and guess which!), but my experience in S.C. tells me otherwise and that's kind of depressing.
February 16, 2008 at 9:27 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
ForPnC (anonymous) says...
I wouldn't call someone waving a gun around a nice guy. I'd call him a cowardly prick. I hope justice is served.
February 16, 2008 at 9:32 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
MotoryachtSoCo (anonymous) says...
PnCoccasionalreader,
You are so correct, Wilson is suffering from failure of command.
Lilly - The reason Wilson is a joke and a bad one at that is "The Peter Principle" in full display..."That we all aspire to our highest level of incompetence"... and Scarlett Wilson is way past that point.
She has become the Amy Winehouse of Charleston, you just have to wonder what next?
February 16, 2008 at 9:50 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
chance78 (anonymous) says...
Lilly -
Could I possibly in my wildest dreams come up with a better example than "Motormouths" post above at the silliness these political hacks will stoop to get their boy elected? You seem like a perceptive women, look into the real stories and decide if she's doing a good job. Motoryacht and SCGal are hilarious fools. This incident is appalling but has about as much to do Ms. Wilson as the teacher DUI has with the secretary of education. Watch the posts over the next 6 months by motoryacht and SCgal - they will just get more idiotic and laughable in their ridiculous agenda driven transparency. Hilarious.
February 16, 2008 at 9:58 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
PnC (anonymous) says...
I know Gray. He is not the terrible person some people on this board are making him out to be. Unfortunately very little good comes from carrying a handgun.
February 16, 2008 at 10:06 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
SCgal (anonymous) says...
It is what it is! You hire employees, surround yourself with those you hand pick and like it or not there is a direct reflection, indication, and correlation of the office!
Go find the article published for the Wando HS kids and the interviews~ IMO, it's all I needed, along with others in helping understand the decisions made regarding the incident!!
February 16, 2008 at 10:13 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
SCgal (anonymous) says...
And all will note- I don't stoop to namecalling or find the need to be so insecure about another's opinion that I feel it neccessary to take jabs at posters who do state their opinion.
I do find, however those who resort to namecalling do so because they don't like reading or hearing the truth about a situation!!
February 16, 2008 at 10:16 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
yeahright (anonymous) says...
I don't know Ervin, but what he did was indefensible. While it's noble that his friends are attempting to "come to his aid" on this board, if it was some common thug who pointed a gun at THEM in traffic I guarantee they'd be feeling differently right now.
He deserves what's coming to him, from the comments on this board to the punishment he gets.
February 16, 2008 at 10:19 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
forget (anonymous) says...
Where has Doug_Huffman been? So many topics this week near and dear to his heart, and no odd ramblings.
Kinda miss him...
February 16, 2008 at 10:19 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
mdtpace (anonymous) says...
motoryachtsoco is a joke. he obviously has a problem with women. His mother must not have held him enough. If she had not fired this idiot immediately, then she would have been wrong for that. If she had taken a wait and see approach, you would have said she was sitting on the fence. SCgal, you wait and see how it unfolds. That's what people like you do, see how it plays out and then commnent with the benefit of hindsight. You are the ultimate monday morning quarterback, teamplayer. I am guessing that neither of these morons are from SC because if you were, you would understand that if you work for the solicitor, sheriff, clerk of court, etc you serve at the pleasure of that elected official. If Blair wins the election, he can fire whomever he wants in that office. And don't sit there and think that he won't dismiss the people who didn't support him. He will. The sheriff can do the same. Watch Dorchester County, whomever is elected will put there own people in place. Some will be holdovers from Nash, some won't. Scgal and motorschmuck, keep those brilliant comments coming.
February 16, 2008 at 10:23 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
SomeTruthPlease (anonymous) says...
I don't doubt that Gray is a wonderful human being. It is also very doubtful that he is stupid. "It's obvious that nothing good comes from carrying a gun"? In some cases that may be true...nothing good comes from someone with a temper carrying a gun, who suffers from road rage. It will be interesting to hear the outcome of this situation. I agree that we have not heard all the facts, but she said he had a gun, described it as black, which is what they found in his possession, so I believe that what most of us believe to be true will be established as fact. So, I say we all leash up our Labradors and run along the Battery after having another cup of coffee.
February 16, 2008 at 10:26 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
SomeTruthPlease (anonymous) says...
I also want to comment...and it has nothing to do with this article, but the article seems to be missing from every source. Yesterday, I was reading the Journal Scene online, and saw an article that referenced a trucking company employee finding packages on the ground where a truck was parked that was heading for Lieber Correctional. That article is now missing, but I swear it said that they found cell phones, marijuana, cocaine, and it was traced to the truck, which still had packages taped to the underside of the trailer. I wonder where that article has gone? Why would it simply disappear from the JournalScene and never make it to the Post and Courier? Curious, Indeed.
February 16, 2008 at 10:30 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
SCgal (anonymous) says...
SCgal, you wait and see how it unfolds
That would be because I am seeing lots of ends of the spectrum with the SC system et. al lately and hey, I'm giving them a fair shot and time to see which way it unfolds due to the inconsistency that have been emerging!!
P.S. Trust me, I know how the system works and what doesn't~~ don't think I can't see through the fluff!! I'll keep the brilliant comments coming, as someone needs to bring some light to the system!!
February 16, 2008 at 10:53 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
ForPnC (anonymous) says...
Forget - I was wondering that too. Where is Doug_Huffman?
Doug, oh defender of firearms, you're not allowed to leave unless you tell us!
February 16, 2008 at 11:16 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
blackwoman (anonymous) says...
The majority of this thread which promotes verbally bashing Solicitor Wilson, likely comes from those who are under the false assumption that the good old boy network is intact. Women have a role in the political and justice system in the South today, a fact that is just too much for some to bear. It's over, the new system works and is progressive. Obama won Alabama, even the South can change. Mr Ervin will be dealt with fairly and justly. He is responsible for his own demise.
February 16, 2008 at 11:26 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
forget (anonymous) says...
Thank you blackwoman, your opinion makes alot of sense. The only thing I see Ms. Wilson doing is her job. Of course she tries to further her career by trying these cases. Everything I do all day long is to further my career. The same with every other person posting here. If they commit the crime, they need to do the time. There are certain jobs that people hold that they have to mind their p's and q's everyday. Mr. Ervin has one of those jobs. The same could be said for a teacher, etc. He needed to conduct himself in a more responsible manner. He failed to do so, and he now has to pay the price.
February 16, 2008 at 11:54 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Perspective (anonymous) says...
The charge of Pointing/ Presenting a Firearm requires a victim such as the girl the gun was displayed at. Two significant things could happen here:
1) The victim "decides" not to pursue this and it all goes away.
2) The solicitors office allows the defendant to enter PTI (Pre-Trial Intervention) and it all goes away and is expunged from ALL records as though it never happened. (Solicitors will tell you that they have the right to send someone to PTI even if the arresting officer objects. Funny thing is they still send a form to the arresting officers asking if they object.)
A charge of unlawfully carrying a firearm does not require a victim. If the subject had the gun out of the glovebox while driving then that is also Unlawful Carrying of a Firearm and is not a double jeopardy charge.
February 16, 2008 at 12:02 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
carolinagirl25 (anonymous) says...
What happened to innocent until proven guilty? I would at least hope that our next Solicitor would adhere to the very foundation upon which our criminal justice system is based.
February 16, 2008 at 3:10 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
GG (anonymous) says...
This guy's lack of character cannot be blamed on anyone else but him. Get real!
I usually read the comments daily on many articles, and I can count on one hand the number of repeat usernames who slam Mrs. Wilson. So she must be doing something positive in her position if so few are quick to criticize.
Chance78 and Blackwoman - Great posts. Thanks for providing concrete points.
February 16, 2008 at 3:21 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
beemz (anonymous) says...
what a worthless piece of anal slime, hell it makes me wonder what other skeletons this A-hole have hiding in his closet ,other than the fact that he is definitely a pathetic rouge wanna be who has anger issues.
Put him in a cell with BIG BUBBA so that he can show him how to treat a lady:..
LMAO
beemz
February 16, 2008 at 3:29 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
MotoryachtSoCo (anonymous) says...
I think the events of the past six months speak for themselves.
As far as Gray Ervin goes "Criminal Defendent 101" keep your mouth shut. You "have the right to speak with an attorney"... yada yada yada.
This should be a lesson to everyone, had Mr. Ervin not said anything he would most likley not be out of a job and or be in the "hot water" he is in now.
Let me explain... is never a good idea no matter how NOT GUILITY you think you are!
Beyond the need for anger management class... he also needs to learn the basics of criminal law.... there is no way he should have been hired by Scarlett Wilson
February 16, 2008 at 4:32 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
MotoryachtSoCo (anonymous) says...
Ask a Cop what he thinks of Scarlett Wilson and you'll get comments like these....
http://www.palmettocops.com/forum/for...
February 16, 2008 at 4:42 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
grainofsalt (anonymous) says...
"The woman is a wacko."
Really? Using that logic, every president is a wacko (of course, some may not disagree!). Every attorney general is a wacko. Hell, every elected official is a wacko, since almost all of them replace at least some of the staff of their predecessor. Every CEO who has taken over a company and replaced underlings must be a wacko too. When I bought my house and didn't keep on the same maid service the previous owner used, I guess I became a wacko too.
I know next to nothing about Wilson or Jennings. (And I'll admit that.) But the fact that he's running against her doesn't exactly make the case for him being an outstanding employee choice to be under her.
He may have been outstanding at his job. Don't know. But I know Wilson did the right thing in the case of the Wando kids and she did the right thing letting this gun-waving buffoon go as quickly as possible. If there are some bad things about her, then give us voters more than "she's a wacko" and she's suffering a "failure of command." That doesn't mean anything. Give us facts.
And Motoryacht, I respect your opinions and have been enjoying your blog. But when you get on Wilson, your diatribes sound like nothing more than campaign material for Jennings. Show us why Wilson is bad. If there's something there, she won't get my vote. I mean it. But the fact that she fired Jennings and did her job with the Wando kids isn't enough.
February 16, 2008 at 4:42 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
MotoryachtSoCo (anonymous) says...
grainofsalt - point well made and point well taken
February 16, 2008 at 4:54 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
stanish (anonymous) says...
While I DON'T have ALL the FACTS, and MOST of YOU DON'T either, I feel a thorough INVESTIGATION be completed with the FACTS released to the public before we RUSH to JUDGEMENT! I'm NOT codoning what the man did if, if it's true, but would rather WAIT and see what comes out an INVESTIGATION. I will point out with the FACTS, especially for you NEGATIVE posters on here that you STILL have a Lt. Govenor(Andre Bauer) in office that has had SEVERAL crashes with the LAWS he's SWORN TO UPHOLD! How SOON we FORGET! YOU PRETEND THAT HE'S ABOVE THE LAW! The SAD REALITY IS that you will more than likely VOTE him as your next Govenor and really be the LAUGHING Stock in America!
February 16, 2008 at 6:38 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
lillycollette (anonymous) says...
MotoryachtSoCo said: "Lilly - The reason Wilson is a joke and a bad one at that is "The Peter Principle" in full display..."That we all aspire to our highest level of incompetence"... and Scarlett Wilson is way past that point."
MotoryachtSoCo this is not a credible answer. I actually know a nincompoop on the bench who cited the Peter Principle as their rational for why they thought they would be a good judge-and the wee toady got elected.
I am not finding any credible reasons behind the comments against Ms. Wilson.
February 16, 2008 at 8:14 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
justafan (anonymous) says...
stand 828"I also disagree with her decision to try the Mt. Pleasant teenagers as adults, because, although it was an adult crime and could have had tragic results, it didn't. What is the point of having a juvenile and adult distinction in the law if it doesn't have to be followed?"
To bad we don't have someone with the balls to make the distinction.
Please don't forget there are other "Wando Boys" yet to be sentenced. Lets not make an example out of them, two lost lives is enough.
February 16, 2008 at 8:22 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
carolinabeachgirl (anonymous) says...
There is no discernable change in the solicitor's office since Ms. Wilson took over. Only the cases that may garner political attention move more quickly, everything else works just like it always has...very, very slow. While I think it inappropriate that Ms. Wilson chose an interview to inform this guy that he was fired he should be fired for this ignorant move.
February 16, 2008 at 8:32 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
COFC2007 (anonymous) says...
lol lol man y'all are so funny lol first person to be disbarred from the Charleston School of Law Wow what a dumb ass for real. lol lol lol lol
February 16, 2008 at 9:07 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
jammer (anonymous) says...
"wonderful nice human beings" don't point deadly weapons at women period, there is no excuse for this at all
he isn't a nice guy, he's a total idiot that deserves nothing less than a good ole jailhouse beat down... over and over until he's humbled down enough not to try to bully smaller weaker people than himself ever again
a little power obviously went to his head, instead of understanding that he was a public servant he thought he was a public superior
I hope he goes to jail for a long time but unfortunately he'll probably walk with a short probation and a few anger management classes
dumba*s...
February 16, 2008 at 9:25 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
JohnS (anonymous) says...
Poor judgement on Wilson's part for not doing a complete background check on this person. This person has some anger issues that would have shown up if someone would have checked out what his neighbors thought of him.
February 17, 2008 at 12:02 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
CarolinaGirl3 (anonymous) says...
I have known Gray my entire life. It is outrageous to me that anyone leaving comments would judge him without knowing the circumstances. Obviously, if you are aware of anything other than the biased article you just read(as well as initial reports), you would know what type a person Gray Ervin really is. You would know that he is the kindest, most hardworking, moralistic person you have ever encountered. You would know that Gray would NEVER harm or put anyone in danger. You would know that he was raised with absolute perfection and with a family anyone would pray to be blessed with and call their own. It is offensive and appalling that anyone would judge and persecute someone based on a newspaper article. While I'm sure the situation is hindsight 20/20...anyone who has labeled Gray as a "thug" is sadly mistaken.
February 17, 2008 at 4:09 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
MotoryachtSoCo (anonymous) says...
lilly - A Normal solicitor toils away quietly with little or no fan fair. Prior to his death how many of us knew the 9th Circuit's solicitors name?
February 17, 2008 at 5:31 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!
Full terms and conditions can be read here.