Dog park should 'stay' in town plan

The Post and Courier
Thursday, February 14, 2008



Photo of David Quick

photo

Kristen Hankla/Staff

Dog parks, such as this one in West Ashley, provide a safe place for dogs to exercise and for their owners to socialize.

Dog owners, it may be time to storm town hall.

After planning efforts indicated that a dog park was one of the most popular ideas for Mount Pleasant's future 22-acre waterfront park and after the town had designated, in preliminary plans, 5 acres on the end farthest from the water, Mayor Harry Hallman and Councilman Kruger Smith say they think the land is "too valuable" for a dog park.

Too valuable?

The S.C. Department of Transportation is giving the land to the town as a result of Councilman Gary Santos asking for it as a passive park long before the Arthur Ravenel Jr. Bridge was finished.

Hallman and Smith now suggest putting a performing arts center on the dog park site instead, which seems far from passive or in keeping with the implied open, green space of a park.

For those who may not know about dog parks, they are simply fenced-in areas where dogs can be unleashed to run and play with other dogs without the risk of getting run over by an SUV, tractor-trailer or school bus. Dog owners from all walks of life also get a chance to meet and share a laugh or two.

In that way, dog parks help build community. That's increasingly difficult in a world dominated by computers, cell phones and MP3 players, especially in sprawling suburban communities cut up by subdivisions, shopping centers and office parks. Suburban governments should feel the need to work harder to keep its residents connected.

Don't get me wrong. Mount Pleasant is great place to live. I know because I've lived there for nearly two decades and covered the East Cooper area, including its five governments, as a reporter for a large chunk of my career.

The town brings its residents together with events such as weekly farmers markets from April to October, several festivals and the Cooper River Bridge Run and Walk, not to mention the best Christmas holiday parade in the area. While most of its parks are "active" (ballfields and recreation complexes), its passive jewels include the Otis Pickett Bridge Recreation Area (aka Pitt Street bridge), James B. Edwards Park (Old Village) and Dorothy Kearns Park (Belle Hall).

Officials take great pride in having one of the top-ranked recreation departments in the state, but in a town with about 60,000 people and a land mass of 42 square miles, guess how many dog parks they have? None. (The Charleston County Park and Recreation Commission provides one at Palmetto Islands County Park.) Guess how many other dog parks, besides the one designated at the waterfront park, are in the works? None.

Unlike some recreation facilities, they can't blame the expense. A dog park costs almost nothing. The basics are a fence, a dog-friendly drinking water fountain, a dispenser for bags to clean up messes and a covered trash can. Ideally, a few trees and benches are nice, too. A dog park would be the least expensive of all the major features of the waterfront park, which includes a 1,200-foot-long pier, visitor center, sweetgrass pavilion, war memorial, children's playground and outdoor amphitheater.

I know, personally, that residents have been asking officials for a dog park for nearly five years. In 2003, resident Kathleen Fox provided a petition with more than 200 names seeking one. Cities across America, including neighbors Charleston and Isle of Palms, have installed dog parks.

Admittedly, Mount Pleasant residents often head to Sullivan's Island to let their dogs romp on the beach during a limited off-leash time in the morning, as well as to Edwards Park and the grounds of Alhambra Hall. But a beach trip often takes a lot longer and is limited in time. If dogs run off-leash at Edwards or Alhambra, it's at a risk. Some dogs tend to turn a deaf ear to owners at the sight of a squirrel, cat or another dog.

Using fenced-in ballfields is strictly verboten by the town. Dog owners have been scolded for using them, in part, because some owners have not cleaned up messes, and little Johnny stepped in it once while running down a fly ball. That's something you don't have to worry about at a dog park, where owners tend to scoop either because it's in the interest of everyone to have a clean park or because of real or perceived peer pressure.

Mount Pleasant's waterfront park is slated to open on Memorial Day weekend of 2009. Almost all of it but the dog park will be in that "phase one." If the town doesn't include a dog park in that phase, it should at least commit to it now and, hopefully, other ones in other parts of town as well.

It's time to fulfill a need and deliver on a promise. It's long overdue.

Reach David Quick at 937-5516 or dquick@postandcourier.com.

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Comments

idennis (anonymous) says...

Man, when I saw this headline in the sports section I thought we were getting a dog track... I had my be all ready... damn...

February 14, 2008 at 5:44 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

gingerisler (anonymous) says...

I agree with Hallman and Smith. The land is too valuable. There are currently two dog parks already east of the Cooper ~ one at the park on Long Point Road and one on IOP. Dog owners should use what they already have.

February 14, 2008 at 7:37 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

rbe1979 (anonymous) says...

Why doesn't the Town of Mt. Pleasant just build more condo's on the property. That is nearly as passive as a performing arts center.

There is already a performing arts center in North Charleston, as well as the Charleston Music Hall Downtown that can be used for such events.

Show some love for the dogs and build a top of the line park for our four-legged friends!

February 14, 2008 at 10:02 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

charleston_grown (anonymous) says...

why don't they develop it into something nice and scenic without buildings or condos. i grew up here, and i am absolutely sick of the greed and manipulation of our town council. we need to stop developing and start preserving, there is only so little left, and lets not waste it with commercial/residential real estate

February 14, 2008 at 8:01 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

chassand (anonymous) says...

Was this land not donated to be used for "green space"? The only green the greedy town council sees is the color of money! I'm also sick of council's manipulation of our tax dollars for their own personal agenda! What's wrong with some of you people?? The public was given ample opportunity to express their input regarding the waterfront park and it's amenities. A dog park was clearly expressed as a desire by most of the public. Is it not town council's job to represent the interests of the people?

February 14, 2008 at 11:50 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

theronce (anonymous) says...

Let's have a place for our cats too. And, I know someone that has some birds that have to stay in a little cage all the time. We are so backward. This is a chance to show the other states how progressive we can be. Even if we collect less taxes because of the supposedly shrinking tax revenues, we can afford to raise the recently reduced property taxes to provide green space to all of our pets. What the heck...it's the government's money.

February 15, 2008 at 9:26 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!

Full terms and conditions can be read here.




.Link.