S.C. scrambles for licenses as registry delayed
By Bo Petersen
The federal hook won't be set — yet.
A new requirement for recreational saltwater anglers to register with the federal government will be delayed at least a year. But an annual fee seems to be on its way.
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration announced Tuesday that the registration requirement will be delayed until Jan. 1, 2010. The announcement comes as South Carolina scrambles to license pier and surf anglers, trying for a possible exemption to the registry to keep the anglers from paying the additional fee, estimated to be from $15 to $25.
More info
NOAA to Create Saltwater Angler Registry in 2010 - a press release from NOAA.
The state already licenses other saltwater anglers; the registry would have started for others in 2009. The fee would be in addition to state license fees and start in 2011.
"The good thing is, this gives us time. There's no money to put all this in place (immediately) anyhow," said Caroline Rhodes, S.C. Natural Resources board member, who owns The Charleston Angler. But her first impression reading the announcement is that "it looks like they want to tack on an additional federal fee no matter what."
Previous story
New federal saltwater license on its way? published 06/12/08
The last-second publication announcing the delay carried a few other changes to the proposed rule. Natural Resources already had draft legislation to license pier and surf anglers ready to go the General Assembly in January; that will now have to be reworked to be approved by the board at its January meeting, Natural Resources board Chairman Mike McShane said.
The annual federal registration would include an angler's name, date of birth, address, telephone number and the regions where they intend to fish. NOAA will use the information to conduct surveys on fishing effort and amounts of fish caught. Once a person has registered, they may fish anywhere in U.S. federal waters.
But the register would exempt anglers in a state that has a registry such as fishing licenses, as well as party, charter or guide boat customers and those with permits to fish highly migratory species such as swordfish.
"The (federal) goal is to get the data," Rhodes said. "We prefer licenses because a registry is keeping track of you and nobody likes that."
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Comments
WSM (anonymous) says...
Never stand between a politician or a beaureaucrat who makes a claim on YOUR pocketbook. Welcome to the "New Serfdom!"
The "Baby Boomer's" desire to have their needs and wants met by the government treasury has sold their kids children's and grandchildren's freedom and prosperity down the river. From the "Greatest Generation" to the "Worthless Generation," to the "Gipped Generation."
Thanks, mom and dad. Sorry I can't afford to take care of you, got taxes to pay for your wild self-gratuitous governmental spending.
December 24, 2008 at 10:16 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
rollnwflo (anonymous) says...
Pray tell me how growing a new government program will put one more fish in the ocean.The plan is step one, require an additional license, and this is the real stinker, in cases where you've already paid for a saltwater license (like here)you will not receive an additional license but you will pay an additional fee, step two, reduce catch limits for recreational fishermen and women. Smells like commercial fishing lobbyist work to me.
December 24, 2008 at 11:42 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Tides (anonymous) says...
Another way to fleece Americans of their money. That is all this really is no matter what they say.
This government of ours is so crooked and corrupt, we are going to have to join forces to take it all back.
December 24, 2008 at 1:39 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!
Full terms and conditions can be read here.
Thank you for your interest in this story. The comment thread for this article has been closed.
- Most Commented
- Most Emailed
- S.C. losing port traffic to other states
- Out with old ...
- Water — 'The smell is gone'
- Cart gives Buddy new lease on life
- Schools plan to update visitor-security system
- GenPhar site 'red-tagged'
- Man, 17, killed in motorcycle wreck
- Off campus
- Historic manor house used by Girl Scouts is among buildings that might be torn down to make way for future
- Tough times have taught comedian's sister to love life
