Owner moving ahead on landfill proposal
Previous Story
County incinerator no longer adds up, published 02/01/08
ADAMS RUN — Wilbur Jones spent much of his childhood hunting in the woods in southwestern Charleston County.
Jones, now in his 60s, is one of many residents and landowners in the rural community off U.S. Highway 17 near Parkers Ferry Road fighting to stop a private company from building a landfill for construction waste in the area. He wants to protect the fragile, low-lying environment for future generations.
The residents also are concerned that if Tre Sheppard of Sheppard Construction in Mount Pleasant is allowed to build the landfill, the door will open for Charleston County to build a landfill for household waste on a tract of land it owns adjacent to Sheppard's property.
Sheppard plans to submit an ap-
plication to Charleston County on Monday to change the zoning of his 300-acre parcel of land so he can
plication to Charleston County on Monday to change the zoning of his 300-acre parcel of land so he can move forward with building the landfill. His project wouldn't be permitted under the property's current agricultural zoning.
Sheppard said he's concerned about the environment and plans to build a landfill that's as environmentally friendly as possible. He also said he plans to plant a buffer of trees around the landfill so that it won't be seen from roads or neighboring property. And he'll continue to take measures to protect an 18th-century black cemetery that sits on the edge of his property.
Jones, whose family owns about 150 acres of land in Adams Run, said he's concerned toxins from the landfill will contaminate the groundwater and residents' wells. In the rural corner of the county, Jones said, "If you don't have wells, you don't have water."
Daniel Pennick, director of Charleston County's planning department, said the county Planning Commission will consider Sheppard's application at its Jan. 12 meeting. Sheppard also will have to apply for an amendment to the county's comprehensive plan, a 10-year plan for managing growth and development, Pennick said. The county then will hold a public hearing on the project in early February, he said.
Lee Pye, who lives adjacent to Sheppard's property, has been fighting against Sheppard's proposed landfill for years. She has stacks of documents on the project and doesn't want a 200-foot pile of construction waste near the edge of her rural property.
Pye and Maggie Ridge, another area resident, said Sheppard's site is on a fault line, surrounded by wetlands and close to the Edisto River and the fragile environment of the ACE Basin. It's simply not a suitable site for a landfill, they said.
Sheppard said he plans to take numerous precautions to make sure the landfill doesn't harm the natural area.
The landfill won't be lined, he said, but all of the construction waste and other debris will be placed on a moving belt, and metal and other items that could harm the environment will be pulled out before the load goes into the ground.
Sheppard said he won't allow lead paint or asbestos to be disposed of in the landfill. The site is high enough so it won't contaminate the groundwater, and he'll dig ground-monitoring wells so groundwater can be monitored regularly, he added.
"This is going to be cutting-edge for this type of facility," he said. And it will bring 40 jobs to the community.
A construction-waste landfill is desperately needed, he said, because the county stopped taking construction waste from contractors at the Bees Ferry Landfill on July 1. The nearest private landfill is 30 miles away, he said.
Sheppard also said that he's trying to be a good neighbor.
He will allow people access, through his property, to a 3-acre 18th-century black cemetery, which once was part of the property he owns but has been deeded to Greater St. Mark AME Church. The church has a key to a lock on a gate and can give the key to people who want to visit their ancestors' gravesites, he said.
He also said he's held five community meeting to address neighbors' concerns. He's aware many residents are opposed to a landfill being built in the area. Sheppard said he invited representatives from the state Department of Health and Environmental Control to answer neighbors' questions. But the representatives left early after being confronted by residents who said DHEC's regulations weren't strong enough, Sheppard said.
College of Charleston biology professor Phil Dustan, an ecologist who supports recycling over building landfills, said he's not familiar with Sheppard's proposal. But he's concerned about an unlined construction-waste landfill being built in the low-lying area. "It's crazy," he said of Sheppard's plan.
Rusty metal could leak chromium into the groundwater, he said. And treated lumber will release toxins. "All of that area is connected by water," he said.
Gregg Varner, Charleston County's solid waste director, said the county owns property adjacent to Sheppard's land that it bought for a future landfill. The county's current landfill on Bees Ferry Road could be full as early as 2024, Varner said.
The property in Adams Run "will be considered for a landfill when the time comes," he said.
Adams Run residents are worried about the impact two landfills would have on their community.
Lee Pye's son, Justin Pye, said, "I agree there's no good site for a landfill. But come on, there has to be someplace better than this."
Reach Diane Knich at 937-5491 or dknich@postandcourier.com.

Comments
laurasmorris (anonymous) says...
To Charleston County, just say "no."
December 14, 2008 at 7:58 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
notax (anonymous) says...
Just say no to this project and just say no to the imposed storm water fee which is just another tax put on residents because Charleston County doesn't want to say "NO" to the Federal Government!
When will citizens realize it is time to get together and just say no to these "fees" put upon us that are in fact, "taxes?"
December 14, 2008 at 8:54 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
osbplantation (anonymous) says...
Citizens concerned about this need to get proactive now and contact their Council members.
This is directly across hwy 17 from the ACE Basin boundary. C&D landfills have been shown even with liners to leach hazardous chemicals into groundwater. Treated wood contains copper, chromium and/or arsenic. Other construction waste when broken down contains a multitude of chemicals that are a threat to human health. All residents of the area rely on well water for their drinking supply as well as the Edisto supplying a good portion of the Charleston Water System. This development is surrounded by wetlands and streams that flow to the Edisto. There is no way to keep pollutants from exiting the site - water flows downhill and soaks into the ground - this where there is a very high water table and prone to flooding. Also some of the last of significant green space left in the County.
No landfill is "state of the art". Burying trash in the ground is not the answer. Nearly all construction waste can be recycled, yard debris can be composted. South Carolina needs to get out of ancient history and get with the program of reducing waste.
How can 200 feet (how many stories is that?) of trash not be visible or disturbing to the residents and the peace of King Cemetery.
Readers - speak your mind here. Pick up the phone and your pens.
December 14, 2008 at 10:37 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
zoomru (anonymous) says...
WOW.....what a SNOOKER..!!
Right before CHRISTMAS...!
Both Charleston County AND Cherokee County are getting RAPED..!!
http://www.goupstate.com/article/2008...
http://www.gaffneyledger.com/
The people of Cherokee and Gaffney weren't even TOLD by their newspaper about PLASMA technolgy...they don't even KNOW their is ANOTHER ...choice..!!??
I bet if the people knew about the benefits of PLASMA ...the PEOPLE would find a way to embrace it.
www.startech.net
December 14, 2008 at 10:17 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
zoomru (anonymous) says...
So ....the PUBLIC has to WAIT until Feb. to let the COUNCIL know their concerns.....while the PROPOSAL gets shoved down pipes without ANY concern for the VARIOUS choices and solutions that are available...???
December 14, 2008 at 11:10 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!
Full terms and conditions can be read here.