Investigator: Drowning accidental

The Post and Courier
Saturday, December 6, 2008


Meekins

Meekins

Previous Story

Defense: Boy might have ingested too much tap water, published 11/21/08

Moncks Corner — An investigator in the delayed drowning death of 10-year-old Jon Jon Jackson said Friday he considered the death an accident.

But police investigator Patrick Cousino also said the death resulted from the actions of Saquan Meekins, who authorities believe used rough techniques to teach the autistic boy to swim in the hours before he died June 1.

Cousino later declined to elaborate on his comments as he left the courtroom.

Cousino's comments came during Meekins' preliminary, or probable cause, hearing at the Berkeley County Courthouse.

A magistrate declined a defense motion to toss out the case. Meekins, 22, remains in the Berkeley County jail on $50,000 bail.

Meekins was charged last month with homicide by child abuse. On June 1 he apparently was trying to teach the boy how to swim at the Branchwood Apartments pool in Goose Creek. His mother lived with the boy's mother.

The boy is believed to have died an hour after leaving the water, apparently after he inhaled water and drowned from fluid in his lungs. The delayed effect also is known as secondary drowning. Homicide by child abuse charges can be filed when there is an extreme indifference to a child's life, the Solicitor's Office has said.

Statements attributed to witnesses who were at the pool that day indicate they had concerns about the rough play and the boy's tired appearance. It was his first time swimming.

One witness said the boy sometimes fought to come up for air and that his head would be submerged, with nothing but his hands visible above the water.

The boy tried to cling to Meekins but he would be thrown back into the water where Meekins would wait "about 10-15 seconds to collect him," according to a police interview attributed to witness Kenneth Simmons.

Another witness, identified as Sara Pologruto, is quoted by police as saying there was a lack of recognition that the boy was struggling.

The boy went "under water for longer amounts of time than she thought a reasonable person would allow," according to her version recorded by authorities.

Meekins' lawyer, Mark Peper, argued that the case should be thrown out because there was a lack of probable cause that a crime occurred. "It is just flat-out an accident," he said.

Family members gave statements to police that said that after the swimming trip, Jon Jon walked with them and that he was sleepy and lay down for a nap.

When someone checked on the boy about an hour later, they found that his lips were blue and white foam was coming from his mouth. He was taken to Trident Medical Center, where he was pronounced dead.

Since Meekins' arrest, the two mothers involved have defended him and his play with the child.



Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version   Add this

Notice about comments:
The Post and Courier is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. The Post and Courier does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our Web site.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Comments

This article has  6 comment(s)

Posted by martinstuart on December 6, 2008 at 1:14 a.m. (Suggest removal)

This was definately child abuse resulting in death.
You do not teach swimming to a child by throwing him in the water and holding his head under water. If the mothers involved and the accused are to stupid to figure this out then others need to learn this to avoid prison.



Posted by kennyt on December 6, 2008 at 6:34 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Never heard of secondary drowning but thank God this idiot was found out for his stupidity. Top Stories Saquan Meekins was sentenced to drowning by accident in court today just like his victim.



Posted by RTC on December 6, 2008 at 10:28 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I wasn't there, but from all of the descriptions given about Mr. Meekin's behavior with the boy, it sounds like he was acting immaturely and trying to show off.
Is it necessary to be so heartless and rough with any child especially an autistic one?
I seriously doubt if Meekins is qualified to teach swimming, particularly to a child with a handicap.
As a past WSI, I can attest that no one should be handled like this in the water. The last thing you want to do is to make a person frightened.
Did Meekins contribute to this child's death by his actions?
Hopefully that can be correctly determined.



Posted by JDV on December 6, 2008 at 1:58 p.m. (Suggest removal)

sadistic bastard, prosecute him!!



Posted by stephaniem on December 6, 2008 at 2:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)

One witness said the boy sometimes fought to come up for air and that his head would be submerged, with nothing but his hands visible above the water---

this does sound cruel but hopefully this witness sticks around...even to recreate what happened for the jury.

I know that I had friends/family who would lightly push my head down (to blow bubbles) and I tried to swim w/o getting my hair or ears wet and they would get upset.



Posted by greyman on December 6, 2008 at 5:41 p.m. (Suggest removal)

So all this horrible stuff was going on and the mother and witnesses just stood there and watched? It sounds kinda strange to me. If it is true then they have some responsability in this as well. Maybe not criminaly ,but they should have done something. Most likely it was not as dramatic as they make it sound. I think most mothers would not sit there while this type of thing went on with there own kid in the pool. just my 2 cents. I was a lifeguard at the beach for several years. Secondary drowning does not take much h2o to happen. I guess they will figure it out in court