Jordan sentenced to 25 months in fraud case

Authorities: Former lawyer stole from client, staged disappearance

By SCHUYLER KROPF
The Post and Courier
Tuesday, December 2, 2008


Michael T. Jordan, who pleaded guilty to wire fraud after taking his client's money and running to Canada, was sentenced Tuesday to 25 months in prison, on top of 11 months of house arrest already served and 5 months he already served in jail.

photo

The Post and Courier

Michael T. Jordan walks toward the Hollings Judicial Center Tuesday for sentencing on a wire fraud charge.

The former lawyer was arrested Aug. 3, 2007 as he tried to re-enter the U.S. through New York. The arrest came after what authorities said was an attempt to stage his own disappearance during a boat trip south of Charleston.

After he failed to return, Jordan, 46, immediately became a suspect in the disappearance of more than $2.35 million from a client he represented in a real estate deal. The money stemmed from the sale of a large parcel of land off Dorchester Road and a trust account established for client Harold L. Brossy.

Under a plea agreement reached with federal prosecutors, Jordan pleaded guilty to one count of wire fraud. He faced a fine and up to 20 years in prison.

His law license was later suspended by the state Supreme Court.

Any fines that were associated with the sentence were waived because Jordan does not have the ability to pay.

His legal team asked that he be held in at the prison in Jesup, Ga., where former state Treasurer Thomas Ravenel is serving 10 months for pleading guilty to conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute cocaine.



Check back with Charleston.net later for more details.

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Comments

summerville_guy (anonymous) says...

Maybe he'll be Al Parish's cellmate.

December 2, 2008 at 10:35 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Magpie (anonymous) says...

If he took $2.35 million, was the money recovered?

December 2, 2008 at 1:54 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

lillycollette (anonymous) says...

Well-ISN'T THAT SPECIAL-his fines were waived because he does not have the ability to pay. Golly gosh gee whiz what will they think of next.

What about the innocent victims of a corrupt family court who are routinely picked clean for no reason at all?

Ooops-I forgot. Ya gotta be a crooked lawyer to get a break around here.

Nevermind.

December 2, 2008 at 6:18 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!

Full terms and conditions can be read here.





.Link.