Why some recording companies avoid iTunes
Ethan Smith and Nick Wingfield
AP
Cutline: Kid Rock has never licensed his music to Apple Inc.'s iTunes, a move that carries some risks for record label and artists.
ITunes has been the runaway hit of the music business, selling more than 5 billion song downloads since it started five years ago. But a growing number of record companies are trying to steer clear of Apple Inc.'s behemoth music store, because they say selling single songs on iTunes in some cases is crimping overall music sales.
Kid Rock's "Rock 'n Roll Jesus" album was kept off iTunes' virtual shelves. It has nonetheless sold 1.7 million copies in the U.S. since its release last year - a sizable number for the depressed music industry. Sales of the album have increased in 19 of the past 22 weeks, according to Nielsen SoundScan, vaulting it to No. 3 on the Billboard 200 sales chart. After witnessing the album's performance, his label, Warner Music Group Corp.'s Atlantic Records, last week yanked an album by R&B singer Estelle from the iTunes Store, four months after it went on sale there - and the same week that one of its songs entered the top-10-selling tracks on Apple's download service.
Avoiding iTunes runs against the conventional logic of the music industry, where it's now taken as an article of faith that digital downloads will eventually replace CDs. But there is growing discomfort with the dominant role iTunes already plays: The store sells 90 percent or more of digital downloads in the U.S., according to people in the music industry. At the start of this year, iTunes become the largest retailer of music in the U.S., surpassing Wal-Mart Stores Inc., according to research firm NPD Group Inc.
Label executives, managers and artists chafe against the iTunes policy that prevents them from selling an album only. ITunes, with few exceptions, requires that songs be made available separately. Consumers strongly prefer that, though Apple also typically offers a special price for buyers who purchase all the songs on an album.
Some artists see their albums as one piece of work, and don't want them dismantled. Their handlers believe they can make more by selling complete albums for $10 to $15 than by selling individual songs.
"In so many ways it's turned our business back into a singles business," says Ken Levitan, Kid Rock's manager. Levitan says the rise of iTunes is far from being a boon to the industry; instead, he calls it "part of the death knell of the music business."
An Apple spokesman declined to comment.
Music sales have been in free fall since 2000, the year file-sharing networks made online copying of music widespread. The launch of Apple's iTunes service in 2003 was hailed as a potential savior for the industry: It allows consumers an easy, legal way to buy music online, while still cutting record companies in on a portion of the sales. But iTunes' rapid growth has turned it into a Goliath, music executives complain. It often asks for exclusive sales rights for songs in exchange for prominent placement on its home page.
Apple isn't willing to sell songs for more than 99 cents. Most record labels see higher prices as critical to increasing revenue. But no other online music store has been able to mount a serious challenge to iTunes. Apple keeps about 30 percent of the price of each music sale, whether it's a 99-cent track or a $10 album, according to people in the music industry. Apple has said it makes little profit from iTunes because of the costs of running the online store.
Irving Azoff, the manager of numerous high-profile acts including the Eagles, says that a few years ago he presented the band with a financial analysis showing that their royalties to date from iTunes sales were far lower than anyone expected.
Guitarist Glenn Frey did some back-of-the-envelope math of his own. "His comment was that it amounted to 39 minutes on stage in Kansas City," Azoff recalls with a chuckle.
Though Azoff didn't disclose the royalty figure, Frey's off-the-cuff analysis implies the band had received less than $500,000 from its iTunes sales at that point. The band's iTunes income has increased since then, Mr. Azoff adds. Nonetheless, he says: "I'm underwhelmed by the number of sales I see on iTunes for the classic bands."
That sentiment was a factor in the Eagles' decision to sell their latest album, "Long Road Out of Eden," only through Wal-Mart.
Before Apple launched the service in 2003, Apple Chief Executive Steve Jobs appealed personally to Azoff for the band's participation, telling the manager that he couldn't imagine launching a music store without his favorite rock group.
Shunning iTunes carries risks for the labels. Not only is it the biggest force in music sales, but keeping songs off the service could prompt listeners to look for illegal downloads instead. In addition, customers have demonstrated a clear preference for buying singles instead of entire albums. Only in a few cases have record labels been able to boost album sales over those of individual songs.
"This is a last gasp for the album format," says Aram Sinnreich, a media professor at New York University, who says most albums have only one or two good songs surrounded by little more than "filler material."
This year, Kid Rock, whose real name is Bob Ritchie, has had a massive radio hit with "All Summer Long" - a nostalgia-soaked rocker built on riffs sampled from two of the most iconic songs in classic rock: Lynyrd Skynyrd's "Sweet Home Alabama" and Warren Zevon's "Werewolves of London."
Levitan, his manager, points out that if his client's album were sold the way iTunes wants, many of his 1.6 million U.S. album sales to date would instead have shown up as 99-cent downloads of "All Summer Long."
Pop singer Katy Perry has sold 2.2 million downloads of her hit song "I Kissed a Girl" in the U.S., nearly 10 times the 282,000 copies she has sold of her "One of the Boys" album. Rapper M.I.A. has sold 888,000 downloads of her surprise hit "Paper Planes," compared with 272,000 copies of the album "Kala."
"Check some of these artists that have hit singles, versus their album sales," Levitan says. "Then compare it to what Kid Rock is doing."
David Goldberg, a former head of Yahoo Inc.'s digital music initiatives, says the grumbling from record industry executives is unlikely to lead to widespread shunning of iTunes, unless a number of top-selling artists of the caliber of Coldplay and U2 were to abandon the Apple site. Even then, Goldberg believes many artists would be hurt by such a move.
"On certain albums, you can justify it, but you're also going to push people to the illegal stuff," says Goldberg, currently an entrepreneur in residence with Silicon Valley venture-capital firm Benchmark Capital.
After witnessing the sales performance of Kid Rock's album, Atlantic Records executives decided to look for other albums whose sales might get a boost from being taken off iTunes, according to people close to the company. They settled on Estelle's "Shine," which had sold 95,000 copies; the song "American Boy" was just taking off as a single, and had recently become one of the 10 best-selling songs on iTunes. In July the label had issued a press release touting the single's success on iTunes.
A Warner Music Group spokesman, Will Tanous, acknowledges that the label removed the album from iTunes. In a written statement, he called the removal part of a broad range of digital-release strategies "uniquely tailored to each artist and their fan base in an effort to optimize revenues and promote long-term artist development."
In other cases, Tanous added, Warner has made songs or albums available exclusively on iTunes for certain periods, if that seemed a promising approach.
Estelle's album remains available on Amazon.com Inc.'s MP3 download store, which gives labels and artists the option to sell their music as intact albums only.
Last year, U.S. consumers downloaded 844 million individual songs from digital-download stores, according to Nielsen SoundScan. By contrast, they bought only 50 million digital albums. Most of these transactions took place on iTunes.
Like Kid Rock, AC/DC has never licensed its music to iTunes. The Australian hard rockers sold an estimated 2.7 million CDs world-wide last year, up from 2.55 million in 2003. The band has consistently sold more than one million CDs in the U.S. alone, year after year. Overall U.S. album sales - of both CDs and digital downloads - declined 21 percent to 500 million copies in 2007 from 2003, according to Nielsen SoundScan.
Since the beginning of 2006, only the Beatles have sold more "catalog" albums in the U.S. than AC/DC - also without licensing their music to iTunes. Among the six best-selling catalog artists during that period, the act that sold the most individual songs digitally - the Rolling Stones - sold the fewest albums, digital or physical. That is important because while the Stones' six million single tracks sold may seem impressive, they represent low-cost, low-profit transactions. Album sales, on the other hand, are much more profitable.
Comments
armymom (anonymous) says...
What a loooooong article for the subject matter. I couldn'g get half way thru it before I lost interest. I feel bad too, this is such an important matter.
August 31, 2008 at 9:57 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Smart_Enough_2_Know_Better (anonymous) says...
Great idea. Antagonize consumers after you've already alienated many of them by prosecuting teenagers and moms for downloading music. Yes, we saw the "face of evil" with that one- and it wasn't those you were prosecuting.
Major artists (Madonna, Coldplay, Radiohead, etc.) are starting to move away from major record labels. Much like the market, long were they held hostage by the folks that controlled the means of production and distribution. But technology has now released that stranglehold.
If you have good content, you CAN build a VERY successful business model around downloading off iTunes and other electronic distribution. It just won't be the obscenely profitable model you were able to extract from the market in the past.
I'd love to feel sympathy for greedy record executives and the "injustice" technology has brought upon them, but I think there are just few more important causes for me to worry about first. And saggy pants isn't one of them.
August 31, 2008 at 11:05 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!
Full terms and conditions can be read here.
Thank you for your interest in this story. The comment thread for this article has been closed.
- Most Commented
- Most Emailed
- S.C. losing port traffic to other states
- Out with old ...
- Water — 'The smell is gone'
- Cart gives Buddy new lease on life
- Schools plan to update visitor-security system
- GenPhar site 'red-tagged'
- Off campus
- Man, 17, killed in motorcycle wreck
- New drug may hold promise for lupus sufferers
- Historic manor house used by Girl Scouts is among buildings that might be torn down to make way for future

