Smoking foes decry fund cut

By SEANNA ADCOX
Associated Press
Saturday, August 30, 2008



COLUMBIA — Opponents of cigarette smoking fear that more teenagers will begin the habit in South Carolina and fewer adults will quit now that prevention programs are getting no state money.

For the last two years South Carolina has spent $2 million on smoking cessation and prevention. At least a half-dozen states have reduced funding for such programs in the economic downturn, but South Carolina was the only one to eliminate it this year.

South Carolina and Connecticut are the only two states that spend nothing on prevention, according to the national Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. Before the money was allocated in 2006-07, South Carolina spent nothing for several years.

"It's a real penny-wise and pound-foolish move to cut these programs back. We know they work to reduce smoking, and reductions in smoking lead to reductions in health care," said Peter Fisher, the group's vice president for state issues.

Since 1999 the youth smoking rate in South Carolina, an historically tobacco-friendly state, has dropped by half, from 36 percent to 18 percent. The teen movement Rage Against the Haze has helped.

The program for 13- to 18-year-olds started in 2002 with tobacco settlement money. Teens educate their peers on the health dangers of tobacco, according to anti-smoking groups.

Now the program is unfunded and is using leftover money on limited training sessions and events.

For the last two years, organizers and teen volunteers have traveled to football games across the state to talk to teens. But their trailer and tent will remained parked Friday on the first full night of the high school football season.

It means the peer-to-peer message won't reach as many teens, said 16-year-old Alesia McFarlin, of Greenville, who signed on last year.

"Adult conversation makes it like somebody's talking down to them instead of informing them," she said.

For the 22 percent of South Carolina's adults who already smoke, the state has continued its 800-number tobacco quit line with federal money, though it has scaled back its follow-up counseling sessions. The line gets roughly 250 calls monthly.

In the past, everyone who called got five return intervention calls. Now those are limited to smokers who are uninsured, on Medicaid or pregnant, said Mary-Kathryn Craft from the Department of Health and Environmental Control's tobacco prevention division.

Other callers get just the initial talk with a quit coach, though workers on the state's health plan have access to a similar quit-for-life counseling program.

Asked about the cuts, lawmakers point to the failed attempt to increase the state's 7-cents-per-pack cigarette tax, the lowest in the nation. Missouri is the next lowest at 17 cents. As of June, New York had highest tax at $2.75.

The South Carolina Legislature's plan would have raised the tax by 50 cents per pack, and put most of the money toward health care, though $5 million yearly would have funded smoking cessation and prevention.

The plan died after legislators were unable to override the veto of Gov. Mark Sanford, who wanted to use the money to cut income taxes.

South Carolina has never come close to spending what the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has recommended it should on prevention programs. The agency has issued recommendations since the 1998 tobacco settlement between the industry and states.

The state's $2 million allocation earned it a national ranking of 45th for 2007-08, according to the latest Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids report. The federal agency had advised spending between $24 million and $62 million.

For the current fiscal year, it recommends a flat $62 million.

However, Rep. Tracy Edge, chairman of a House subcommittee that handles health care in the budget, noted that the state has markedly changed since he took office in 1996.

It has gone from fighting for tobacco rights to nearly passing the first cigarette tax hike in 31 years.

Cities across the state ban smoking in restaurants and bars.

"Glorification of smoking is gone," but spending on prevention programs hasn't been a priority, partly because some lawmakers doubt their success or think smokers should be able to quit on their own, said the North Myrtle Beach Republican.

"I think we haven't transformed totally yet, but we've come a heck of a long way," he said.

While he expects the Legislature to put money in the programs once the economy improves and the cigarette tax hike passes, he said it will probably never climb to the CDC-recommended levels.

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Add this

Comments

KidYendor (anonymous) says...

Government should focus on spending money on the military, police, courts, jail, sanitation, education. Stopping people/youngsters from smoking cigarettes should not be a worry of government. Stopping kids from smoking is not a responsibility of government, it is the responsibility of parents.

August 30, 2008 at 1:31 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

NativeSon (anonymous) says...

Stopping kids from smoking is the responsibility of all of us. It is a "community" obligation. Gov. Sanford remains in the dark ages when it comes to what is best for our children.

You think parents give a damn about the health of their children? I think many do not. Just look at how many take their children into smoking areas of restaurants and force them to sit there and smoke while they have their dinners. Or the mindless retards who light up while standing within 20 feet of a child. These insensitive, self absorbed people are responsible for many children taking up this filthy habit.

The government needs to begin taking responsibility for making decent laws and in inforcing existing laws when it comes to our children.

If a restaurant wants to have a smoking area, fine. It just needs to be limited to people 18 and over because it is illegal to provide tobacco to a minor in any form which includes second hand smoke or throwing a lit cigarette on the ground where a child can pick it up.

Smokers do not know love they only know selfishness.

So wise up gov sanford!

August 30, 2008 at 5:54 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

feb251939 (anonymous) says...

Stopping kids from smoking is the responsibility of all of us...INDIVIDUALLY AS PARENTS.

You 'It takes a Village' people need to take care of YOUR OWN CHILDREN and keep your noses out of how others are taking care of theirs.

So YOU wise up, nativeson.

August 30, 2008 at 7:41 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

drp7773 (anonymous) says...

Sounds like another greedy program that does not work but they want the money to come in to spend any way they want, these teens and parents know how bad cigs are and then they make the choice anyways to smoke same as drugs. My god they are taught in school, church etc. from the time they are born that smoking and drinking and driving and drugs are a bad choice but guess what they do it anyways. Like Cigs and alcohol. it's time to legalize an ounce or less of pot and take the glory out of it because they want to rebel and do something illegal. The cost of a pack of cigs and whatever pot cost now, I don't see young kids beiing able to get the money to keep buying. Parents instead of sending cash with your teens to school for (lunches they don't buy) but instead buy a pack of cigs or a joint why not send a check so they have no choice but to give it to the school. And cut back on the big allowance each week, come on you know the kids don't do anything to warrent it anyways. Hide the good drugs instead of putting them in the medicine cabinet, they just steal a few and sell them. And last, Parents step up and talk to the kids every week about cigs, drinking, drugs etc. We cant stop them all but we can stop many from trying it to begin with. No program is needed when after all they are gonna do what they gonna do (just like we did at their age).

August 30, 2008 at 10:38 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Read our full Terms and Conditions.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!

Thank you for your interest in this story. The comment thread for this article has been closed.


 

Most Popular

 

Sponsored Links