Connect with us:   Subscribe to the paper  |   View the mobile edition  |   Get daily e-mail news  |   Get mobile alerts  |   Share your photos  |   Report news  |   Place an ad  |   Contact us


District 2 board pares down referendum

The Post and Courier
Friday, August 29, 2008


— The cost of a proposed referendum to build new schools around Summerville has shrunk by more than $30 million.

District 2 officials are studying ways to make the proposal more palatable to voters affected by rising prices and declining home values.

The latest proposal, hammered out at a school board workshop this week, is to borrow about $165 million, down from $195 million considered about two weeks ago.

The board cut the cost of the referendum by eliminating a $12.8 million community auditorium planned for somewhere in Summerville and a $3 million public library at Fort Dorchester High School. Those projects may still be included on the ballot, but they would be a separate item and not part of the schools referendum.

The board also cut a $17 million list of renovations. The district would still borrow money to put air-conditioning in middle-school gymnasiums and repair ventilation systems and roofs, but the expense would not be part of the referendum.

On the other hand, the board added $3 million to the referendum to expand vocational programs for students at risk of not graduating.

A key question is what to do about Rollings Middle School of the Arts, an aging building in downtown Summerville. The referendum includes a new middle school. Officials are studying whether to use the old building for Summerville Elementary School or whether to move the district offices there, which would free up the office site for Summerville High School.

Read more in tomorrow's editions of The Post and Courier.







Latest local stories





Sponsored Links


Notice about comments:
Charleston.net is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Charleston.net does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not charleston.net. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Comments

This article has  0 comment(s)


(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Search Charleston.Net Archives for Latest News


Charleston.Net Customer Care | Subscribe to Paper, Register for email news updates, manage your online account, place a classified ad, or contact us




Charleston.net logo

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 the Evening Post Publishing Co.

Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of service, Privacy policy and our Parental consent form. (Updated 2/9/2007)