SPA reports record earnings

By Allyson Bird
The Post and Courier
Friday, August 22, 2008



photo

David Posek

Despite a 10 percent drop in container volume, the State Ports Authority's bread and butter, the agency still reported record revenue and earnings for its recently ended fiscal year.

Because of those numbers, officials announced that the SPA would not need any additional taxpayer funding for two projects: a harbor widening completed in 2004 and an access road needed for the new terminal under construction at the former Navy base in North Charleston. How to pay for those two projects had been an open question until Thursday's announcement.

The SPA said its operating revenue for fiscal 2008, which ended June 30, grew 7.6 percent to $165 million, while earnings grew 9.7 percent to $54.7 million. Operating expenses rose 6.6 percent to $110 million, according to port officials.

SPA board chairman David Posek said in a news release that "from a financial standpoint, South Carolina's public port system is very healthy.

"These strong numbers allow us to cover the costs of current operations along with the new container terminal in North Charleston," he said in the release. "That is good news for both our customers and the people of South Carolina."

The Charleston Harbor Deepening and Widening Project will require an additional $7.9 million in state funds, for which the SPA now plans to foot the bill.

More than $182.5 million in state and federal funds, plus about $7 million in interest, has been allocated to the access road that will connect Interstate 26 to the new terminal under construction. But at a recent Charleston legislative delegation subcommittee meeting, State Senate President Pro Tem Glenn McConnell wondered if that would be enough.

SPA President and CEO Bernard Groseclose Jr. felt confident it would, but a state Deparment of Transportation representative wasn't so sure. On Thursday SPA officials said they could pick up any remaining tab on that project as well.

The number of cruise ship passengersclimbed 35 percent in Charleston in fiscal year 2008.

photo

The Post and Courier

Groseclose

But after October 2009, the ship that brings in nearly three-quarters of the port's cruise calls, the Norwegian Majesty, will no longer call here as it becomes part of another company's fleet.

Break-bulk cargo volume grew 23 percent. But cruises and break-bulk combined account for only about 10 percent of port traffic. And container volume, which accounts for the remaining 90 percent, fell 10 percent.

After receiving word of the port's accomplishments, House Majority Leader and ports subcommittee Chairman Jim Merrill cautioned that those numbers don't reflect what is an underlying problem.

"I'm glad the port has positive news. However, I hope we're not just putting a bit of whitewash on deeper concerns," Merrill said.

"With inflation rising, there will be an increase in revenue, but eventually it's going to catch up with us if the ports we've competed against are increasing their container volume."

Savannah, the Port of Charleston's historical rival, announced that it handled nearly 15 percent more containers in its latest fiscal year, setting a record, at the same time Charleston's cargo volume dropped.

Posek blamed the drop here on market conditions. And Groseclose, while addressing the legislative delegation, attributed the loss to Charleston's lack of a network of distribution centers. Such a network has contributed to Savannah's success.

Savannah moved the equivalent of more than 2.6 million 20-foot-long containers last year, while Charleston moved fewer than 1.7 million.

Reach Allyson Bird at 937-5594 or abird@postandcourier.com.

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Comments

zmysticman (anonymous) says...

Great to know the SPA is "making money" under Mr Groseclose's watch....my husband as a member of the ILA has gone from working 3 to 4 days a week to 1 day a week if he's lucky! Now he has three jobs just to make ends meet....the drop in work since Groseclose took over has been tremendous....someone needs to look beyond the surface numbers and hold him accountable for the loss of work union members now have due to loss of volume! There's a reason why New Orleans got rid of Mr Groseclose, Souith Carolina needs to do the same!

August 22, 2008 at 8:17 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

justmyview (anonymous) says...

How much money goes back to the State of South Carolina?

August 22, 2008 at 8:49 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

dontpullupthedrawbridge (anonymous) says...

You need to check your facts zmysticman... according to the SCPA website, Charleston's container business is up 47% since 1997 when Grossclose took over. Also, it was Ron Brinson that worked in New Orleans, not Grossclose.

August 22, 2008 at 9:53 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

HighDef (anonymous) says...

this new port should be a perfect fit for the market ? Your husband will obviously get more days on the job if the greenie's stop road blocking it.
They def. need to figure out an easier truck/rail system running out of town besides the current widening, why not a truck only lane from New port-Mt p ramp on 5-26 junction out past NC ?

August 22, 2008 at 11:37 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

RTC (anonymous) says...

justmyview, the SPA pays the state 6.5% on every dollar that they earn.

August 23, 2008 at 10:59 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

RTC (anonymous) says...

dontpullupthedrawbridge, you are absolutley correct. There are so many union workers that hate Groseclose, and they don't even know a thing about the man.
SPA workers also do not make the wages that the ILA makes.
It must be nice for many union workers to have barely a middle school education and pull in 6 figures a year. Mind you, I said many, not all. SPA employees have to have a minimum HS education or equivalent, and many jobs require college degrees or previous experience. This does not hold true for most union members.

August 23, 2008 at 11:08 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!

Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Thank you for your interest in this story. The comment thread for this article has been closed.



Most Popular

 

Sponsored Links