Connect with us:   Subscribe to the paper  |   View the mobile edition  |   Get daily e-mail news  |   Get mobile alerts  |   Share your photos  |   Report news  |   Place an ad  |   Contact us


Road upgrade questioned

Some council members say $2M price tag is too high for private street serving only 5 homes

The Post and Courier
Thursday, August 14, 2008


Cliff Brown lives along Hutchinson Road, which he said is often impassable, and he said $2 million isn't too much to spend on improvements.

Tyrone Walker
The Post and Courier

Cliff Brown lives along Hutchinson Road, which he said is often impassable, and he said $2 million isn't too much to spend on improvements.

If you go

What: Charleston County Council Finance Committee meeting

When: 4:15 p.m. today

Where: Lonnie Hamilton III Public Services Building, 4045 Bridge View Drive, North Charleston.

More Information: Call 958-4030 or visit charlestoncounty.org.

The Post and Courier

Some Charleston County Council members are balking at the idea of spending $2 million to improve and reroute a portion of a private rural road in Awendaw that serves only 13 properties and five homes.

The council's Finance Committee is expected to vote on whether to recommend that the full council finance the project to upgrade, but not pave, Hutchinson Road.

Councilman Joe McKeown said he opposes the project, which was approved in 2006, before he was elected.

"It doesn't make sense financially, and it doesn't make sense to disturb that area," said McKeown, who represents the area.

Jim Neal, the county's interim director of public works, said Hutchinson Road is one of 60 mostly private community roads that the council is considering improving. The road is last on a prioritized list of such projects, he said.

The county puts road projects on the list if people who live on the road get a certain percentage of signatures from neighbors supporting the project.

Enough residents of Hutchinson Road signed a petition in 1995 for the county to consider the project, Neal said, but the county wasn't able to secure the right of way from enough land owners to make the project happen.

The project languished until March 2006, when County Council asked the Department of Public Works to come up with four options for improving the road.

Later that spring the council authorized the department to move forward on one of the options, Neal said.

That option would shift the entrance to Hutchinson Road from one point on Causey Pond Road to another, cut across property owned by Winwood Farm Home for Children, run across a dam that divides a pond, then connect to an existing dirt road.

"From an engineering standpoint," Neal said, "it's possible to put a road there, but it would be expensive and difficult," he said.

Jody Tamsberg, chairman of Winwood Farm's board of directors, said his group is strongly opposed to the project. "It would cross our property and fill in part of our pond," he said. And it would make the property less secure, he said.

The organization treats abused children, and abusive parents could try to gain access to their children, he said. Now, Winwood Farm has just one entry point, he said.

Councilman Henry Darby said he's in favor of the project. The county promised it was going to improve the road, he said, and it owes it to the people who live there to follow through.

Cliff Brown, who lives on Hutchinson Road with his wife, said mostly family members live along the road.

He said he doesn't think $2 million is too much for the improvements.

"The reason you pay road taxes and state taxes is for situations like this," he said.

The road now is often impassable, he said, especially at high tide or after a storm.

"We want convenience and access to get in and out, what everybody wants," he said.

Alfonzo Blake, who's been living on the road for 43 years, said the road can be dangerous. His 80-year-old father, who has lived on the road his entire life, lives with him. When his father needed emergency care, he said, EMS workers almost couldn't get to the house because of poor road conditions.

Blake said some council members have said he and his family members who own land on the road want road improvement only to boost the value of their land, which sits on the Wando River.

But, he said, he's not trying increase the value of land so he can sell it and move on. "I plan to live back here a lifetime."







Latest local stories




Sponsored Links


Notice about comments:
Charleston.net is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Charleston.net does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not charleston.net. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Comments

This article has  7 comment(s)

Posted by WhoCares on August 14, 2008 at 7:01 a.m. (Suggest removal)

How long is this road and how much per-mile is it going to cost taxpayers? This information would be nice to know...and should have been included in the article. Very bad reporting Diane Knich!!! Editors????



Posted by JC on August 14, 2008 at 9:44 a.m. (Suggest removal)

RW - why don't you read the story before putting down people. The road is in AWENDAW - NOT Charleston. What does that have to do with parking garage fees in another part of the County?

My question is why is taxpayer's money going to improve a PRIVATE Road? Private means everyone else can be kept off of it. Private means they can put a gate up if they want. Impassable or not, it's not the taxpayers place to be spending a dime on that road or any other private road.



Posted by bkeelin on August 14, 2008 at 9:53 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Cutting across Windwood Farms would be a big mistake. That facility works hard to protect and care for children who either come from abusive homes or are uncontrollable and can't stay in the home. I know of two kids that I have worked with in the inner city who reside there and both of them have made dramatic progress in dealing with their anger issues and coming to grips with what a normal family life actually looks like. They should not cut through the middle of this ministry.



Posted by BILLYBOB on August 14, 2008 at 11:15 a.m. (Suggest removal)

WELL $2,000,000.00 / 5 FAMILIES = $400,000.00 EACH - OFFER THEM 200,000.00 EACH AND THEY WILL TAKE IT AND WE WILL SAVE $1,000,000.00



Posted by icunvme on August 14, 2008 at 1:10 p.m. (Suggest removal)

In the picture it doesnt even look like a real road it look like a road where the hunters go!....at least make it a dirt rd geesh!....mus b 2 much black ppl back there



Posted by ptmama73 on August 14, 2008 at 3 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Private road means that the road is owned and maintained by private owners! It is NOT the state or county's responsibility to maintain or improve upon a private road. (This includes gated communities also.)

With that being said, if they really want the road to be repaired and maintained by the state/county they will need to grant the right-of-way (standard when a county takes over maintenance) that was requested 13 years ago.



Posted by ashleyatwork on August 15, 2008 at 3:37 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I sure hope current County Council puts an end to this immediately. $400,000.00 each to 5 families. Crazy!!!!!




(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Search Charleston.Net Archives for Latest News


Charleston.Net Customer Care | Subscribe to Paper, Register for email news updates, manage your online account, place a classified ad, or contact us




Charleston.net logo

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 the Evening Post Publishing Co.

Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of service, Privacy policy and our Parental consent form. (Updated 2/9/2007)