Missouri attorney general files suit against JK Harris
By Michael Buettner
The attorney general of Missouri has filed a lawsuit against a North Charleston company that offers help to taxpayers who owe money to the Internal Revenue Service, alleging that it failed to provide the services it promised and didn't provide refunds to customers who complained.
Missouri Attorney General Jay Nixon filed the lawsuit against JK Harris & Co. in Jefferson County, Mo., on Tuesday.
A JK Harris representative said Wednesday that the company had not received a copy of Nixon's complaint and could not comment on specific allegations.
The lawsuit alleges that JK Harris violated Missouri's Merchandising Practices Act and other state laws and seeks "full restitution" for customers who paid the company for its services but then claimed they did not receive any help from the company in settling their tax bills with the IRS.
The complaint also alleges that a JK Harris subsidiary, Professional Fee Financing Associates LLC, violated the state's Truth in Lending Act and operated in Missouri without registering as a corporation there, and seeks to void all loan agreements Missouri residents made with the company.
The lawsuit also asks the court to order the two companies to pay penalties of $1,000 for each violation and 10 percent of the total amount of restitution.
The lawsuit outlines procedures it said JK Harris describes on its Web site and in other marketing materials to help "anyone who is in a 'crisis situation' with the IRS." According to the complaint, "in most cases" Harris did not follow those procedures.
"After submitting their paperwork multiple times and being shuffled from assigned caseworker to assigned caseworker, consumers requested refunds from JKH," the complaint states. "To date, JKH refuses to issue full refunds to consumers who contracted with and made advance payments for its debt-relief services without receiving said services."
Josh Baker, executive vice president of client advocacy at JK Harris, said Wednesday that the company could not comment on the allegations because it had not been served with the lawsuit.
"What we can say is our customers and their satisfaction are our top priority," he said. "JK Harris has become the nation's largest tax resolution firm ... having served over 225,000 customers since 1997 because of proven results and satisfied customers."
He said the company has worked with more than 1,400 customers in Missouri "and have received four complaints, and we responded promptly to them."
JK Harris was the defendant in another lawsuit filed by Nixon's office, which was settled in 2005. In that settlement, the company neither admitted nor denied any wrongdoing but agreed to pay about $43,000 and change its business practices.
Nixon spokesman John Fougere said Wednesday that the new lawsuit is not related to the previous one, but was filed for "pretty much the same reasons."
In June the company reached a settlement in a similar lawsuit filed by the attorneys general of 18 states. JK Harris denied any wrongdoing but agreed to pay $1.5 million in restitution and change its advertising.
South Carolina Attorney General Henry McMaster originally was part of the task force that filed that lawsuit, but opted out in 2005 after concluding that the company had done nothing illegal.
In an interview published Wednesday by WebCPA.com, an Internet news site for the accounting industry, company founder John K. Harris attributed the attorney generals' involvement to JK Harris' dominance in the tax-settlement industry.
"It happens in every single industry," he said on the site. "Once they grow and become any size, then regulators start looking at the industry. It was an entire industry problem, and we have been the leaders for the last three or four years."
Last year the company reached a similar settlement agreement in a class-action lawsuit filed in Charleston County. Under that settlement, JK Harris agreed to pay $6 million and make a number of changes to its business practices.
The first payments to customers who joined the lawsuit are scheduled to be sent out early next year, according to Mario Pacella of the Strom Law Firm in Columbia, the coordinating counsel for the plaintiffs.
JK Harris provides help to people who owe back taxes to the IRS, through a program known as "offer in compromise," under which the IRS allows some people to settle their tax bills for less than the amount owed.
Reach Michael Buettner at 937-5553 or mbuettner@postandcourier.com.
Comments
joemas (anonymous) says...
I think that it's a crime whenever any company has massive customer complaints against them. It shouldn't matter whether or not you can prove a law has been broken.
There are professional ethics that regulate CPA's and Attorneys so that Licensed professional firms couldn't even exist for long with massive consumer complaints. Perhaps people should consider professionally licensed firms when hiring someone to help them with their IRS problems.
If you want free information to help select a representative, please visit http://www.irsadvisorchecklist.com
September 9, 2008 at 2:52 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Louiedafitta (anonymous) says...
I am happy to hear someone is doing somthing about J.K.Harris. I too have had similar refund problems with this Company. They seemed to make no effort to resolve my tax problems. I.R.S placed a levy on my personal bank account because of J.K.Harris lack of proceedure to stop the "Bleeding" of I.R.S. I personally resolved my problems over the phone with the Government. I am now in the process of retaining my refund from J.K.Harris. If anyone can help me with my dilema, Please contact me. Wish me luck.
Louis Selvaggi
116 Riverside Blvd. #2
Long Beach NY 11561 Louiedafitta@aol.com 516-608-0442
December 12, 2008 at 3:24 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
employedinsc (anonymous) says...
Is it possible that this lawsuit was initiated by the Missouri AG because H&R Block, who is also headquartered in Kansas City, MO, has decided to go into the Tax representation business? Hasn't H&R Block been on friendly terms with the IRS for years?
January 20, 2009 at 5:09 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Louiedafitta (anonymous) says...
I too am a victim of JK Harris. At first they told me they would put me into a non-collectable file to the I.R.S. They kept sending me paperwork to fill out, Which I have done, And was always told they never recieved these forms. I signed up in Sept.2008 And the end of Dec. my bank account was put on a levy by I.R.S. My holiday season had turned out to be a desaster because of their incompatance. When I called my case worker she told me I didn't send them all the paperwork. I have copies of everything they needed and called everytime to make sure they were recieved. I was told they have what I sent , But insisted they needed more information. This is when I decided to call I.R.S. myself. We had come to an agreement to make monthly payments(which I can't really afford, being on Soc. Sec. Disability) My initial payment was $500 which JK Harris gladly took from my bank account, With monthly payments of $100 until the total of $1500 was paid. I send them a Letter of Termination of Agreement from the instructions on the back of the agreement form. Their answer to me concluded that I was not eligable for a refund because of their "Pro-Rata" policies. In the long run I was out $600 and another $700 which I.R.S. had taken from me. Something has to be done to stop this bogus company. I would love to join your efforts and testify for you and help stop this MONSTER. Who knows maybe I could benifit from this. I know I have learned a lesson to trust these fraudulent companies. Please let me know if I could be of any help.
Louis Selvaggi
Louiedafitta@aol.com
February 16, 2009 at 10:57 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Read our full Terms and Conditions.
Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!
Thank you for your interest in this story. The comment thread for this article has been closed.
- Most Commented
- Most Emailed
- Shared
- Upper King on rise: Hotels, apartments, restaurants changing face of downtown area
- UPDATE: Missing woman's fiance seen leaving scene of burned SUV, carrying a shovel
- Missing woman case gets murkier
- Magnolia Gardens offering free dream wedding to contest winner
- Body of missing woman's fiance was found near handgun
- Pinterest: Pinning hopes and dreams
- DAVID SLADE: S.C. offers hybrid car tax credit
- Black women today: Strong. Resilient. Ambitious.
- Ex-Boeing worker claims racism, retaliation in firing
- MCDERMOTT COLUMN: Golf business has risks, rewards



