Critics resist higher loan rates in 'declining markets'
By Kenneth Harney
Could widespread designations of entire ZIP codes, metropolitan areas, even entire states as "declining markets," hinder a real estate recovery and hurt minority groups and moderate-income buyers disproportionately?
Growing ranks of critics say the answer is yes.
Since late 2007, most lenders, insurers and mortgage investment firms have compiled lists of local markets that they consider to be posing higher risks because housing values are dropping. Within those areas, borrowers are charged higher rates, loan fees and down payments.
In some cases, the extra fees can add more than two percentage points to the interest rate, and require higher cash up front from applicants. At their extreme, declining market designations remove entire categories of real estate from financing eligibility. Some private mortgage insurers, for instance, won't touch second homes or rental home investments anywhere inside large swaths of Florida or California.
But now a broad-scale reaction against declining real estate market policies is taking shape. An alliance of three "multicultural" real estate trade groups representing Hispanics, blacks and Asians recently asked the mortgage industry to get rid of its current patchwork of proprietary and often contradictory lists and replace them with a single, more flexible and transparent policy for assessing the "true risk" on real estate in local markets.
Timothy Sandos, president and chief executive of the National Association of Hispanic Real Estate Professionals, said current policies have the effect of cutting out or penalizing huge geographic areas that contain many smaller sub-markets where values are relatively stable or do not pose exceptional risks. Sandos wants greater emphasis to be placed on what appraisers document about the direction of the local market, rather than computer-generated statistical models.
This "would allow homes to be evaluated as individual risks," Sandos said, rather than painted wholesale with scarlet letters as "declining" when in fact they are not. Minorities and moderate-income households may be disproportionately affected by such broad-brush designations, he added, and they are often less able to come up with the higher down payments and extra fees demanded. That, in turn, makes selling and buying tougher in their neighborhoods, lowers demand and prices, and constitutes what Sandos calls "a circular, self-fulfilling prophecy," with the designation actually fueling further decline.
Sandos' group co-authored the critique along with the National Association of Real Estate Brokers, which represents black realty professionals, and the Asian Real Estate Association of America.
The biggest real estate lobby, the 1.3 million-member National Association of Realtors, also has weighed in on the issue. In April 11 letters to the chief executives of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, Richard F. Gaylord, the group's president, asked the two companies to "discontinue the policy of stigmatizing entire ZIP codes or (metropolitan areas)" as declining markets since they "typically include widely differing" local neighborhood conditions.
Steven Brooks, executive vice president of Flagstar Bank, a major lender based in Troy, Mich., confirmed that as a general rule, if Fannie Mae's automated underwriting system identifies an area as declining, "we typically will follow that" finding in underwriting and pricing a loan application. However, he said, "on a case-by-case basis" when an appraisal comes in with a strong, well-documented valuation, "we do make exceptions" and override Fannie's automated advisory.
Asked for comment on the declining markets issue, Fannie Mae spokesman Brian Faith said the company has "sought and received input" from consumer and industry groups, "and we take it seriously."
Bottom line: For the time being, if you own a property or plan to buy in any of dozens of metropolitan areas and thousands of ZIP codes dubbed as declining, expect to pay extra when you apply for a loan: At least 5 percent extra on downpayments, a higher interest rate, and maybe a more limited menu of loan options.
Kenneth Harney writes about real estate matters for the Washington Post Writers Group. His e-mail address is kenharney@earthlink.net.
Comments
Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.
Notice about comments:Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!
Full terms and conditions can be read here.
Thank you for your interest in this story. The comment thread for this article has been closed.
- Most Commented
- Most Emailed

