Gov. Sanford deserves applause for stand on REAL ID

Sen. W. Greg Ryberg
Friday, April 4, 2008



photo

Greg Ryberg

Gov. Mark Sanford decided not to request an extension of time for compliance with the federal REAL ID program. I applaud his steadfast defense of South Carolinians and their rights and their pocketbooks.

REAL ID represents nothing less than a massive federal intrusion with a multi-year, multi-million dollar price tag paid for by South Carolinians. REAL ID promises to return the state's Department of Motor Vehicles to the days of multiple trips and waits of an hour or more.

REAL ID threatens to leave thousands of South Carolinians without the ability to drive at all. REAL ID, finally, offers no solution to security. If federal documents were the answer, then we would have no illegal aliens in this country. Thank you, governor, for telling the federal government to keep their national ID card.

The cost alone warrants Gov. Sanford's defiance. The S.C. DMV reports that to implement REAL ID, it must develop new processes and build verification systems that do not currently exist. This would require an estimated $16 million in one-time funds and $10 million in ongoing funds. That is $10 million dollars a year, every year, that could be spent on education, public safety or roads and bridges, instead of paying for a federal mandate that offers no real hope of making us any safer than we are now.

REAL ID would cost individual South Carolinians as well.

The DMV reports that a REAL ID could cost as much as $60 as opposed to the $25 for our driver's license. Also, our current driver's licenses remain valid for 10 years, whereas a REAL ID remains valid for only eight. Anyone who needs a license for the next 40 years would spend an extra $200 for the privilege.

The REAL ID also would immediately return our DMV waiting rooms to the clogged mess they used to be. The process to issue a REAL ID would change considerably, compared to the way the DMV currently issues driver's licenses. The DMV would have to take the necessary documents and verify them for authenticity and scan them into its database.

These additional steps could increase the average wait time from 15 minutes to one hour, and that wait could grow to as much as two hours during peak operating times.

This scenario applies if you only have to go once. But, suppose you do not bring the right documents. When South Carolinians apply for a REAL ID, they must provide proof of citizenship, a Social Security card and proof of residency. Married or divorced women must also provide a marriage license or divorce decree to document their name change.

Customers would not leave the field office with a REAL ID that day. Instead, they would receive a temporary non-compliant credential. The DMV would electronically verify all of the source documents, and the REAL ID would be mailed to customers within two to three weeks after the office visit. But, if any documents failed, the applicants would get to start all over.

The reality remains that many, South Carolinians will never qualify for a REAL ID. Prior to 2002, the DMV did not require an applicant to present a certified birth certificate, a Social Security card or proof of residency. If customers did not have a birth certificate, they could provide two of the following: a family Bible, a census report, an insurance policy more than 5 years old, military DD214, a passport, immigration papers, a visa, a baptismal record, school records, a military ID card, or a letter from the Social Security Administration. If they received their driver's license prior to 2002 with any of these documents, they now would be disqualified.

The final ruse in the REAL ID drama is the idea of an "extension." Proponents of an extension have argued that it offers South Carolina more time to study the implications of the REAL ID. The federal government sees it otherwise. Department of Homeland Security spokesperson Amy Kudwa said recently, "We're pleased that states continue to work with us toward implementation, and this will be an ongoing dialogue." She added that, "An extension request is not an extension simply for more time, it's an extension to move toward compliance. So it needs to be a good-faith request for extension."

Gov. Sanford easily realized that the REAL ID offered South Carolinians much headache and expense (and offered some the prospect of never driving again), while offering little if any guarantee of increased security. Gov. Sanford deserves our thanks for standing up to the federal government and protecting our rights.

Sen. W. Greg Ryberg, Republican, represents Dist. 24 in Aiken County.

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Comments

Beachbumwannabe (anonymous) says...

This is blatant political grandstanding of the highest order.

Mark Sanford knew SC would be given an extension, whether he asked for it or not. So he creates this theatre :perhaps a circus:to show how he stands up for us. But it was never a fight. Our rights were never at stake. It was all for show.

Good golly:when will the people of SC wake up and see that Sanford and his ilk advance THEIR personal agenda, not ours, by politics like this. Sanford is the darling of cash donating right wingers every all across this country, and he used us, the taxpayers of SC, as the pawns.

There is a reason that we are such a poor state:and that we rate so lowly in every category. And that is we have leaders that serve themselves, not us. Mark Sanford's national reputation and purse strings have swollen: all while our government has ballooned in its size and inefficiencies. He profits for talking the talk, not walking the walk.

April 4, 2008 at 6:50 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

rollnwflo (anonymous) says...

Really, a piece of paper is going to make us safer. If you vote for a different party, or have a different philosophy from the Gov, go ahead and say so. Just don't go around promoting the view a Real ID will protect this country. Its no different than another piece of paper, called a restraining order, which is supposed to protect battered spouses. How's that working for you? Every week we read of a woman killed somewhere with RO in place and being enforced. We already have a piece of paper, the immigration laws currently on the books, what we lack is the will to enforce those laws. Just say what you mean, and leave the silliness out of it.

April 6, 2008 at 11:07 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!

Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Thank you for your interest in this story. The comment thread for this article has been closed.


Hot Topics

 



.Link.