Caps to bring biggest property tax changes

People buying homes in future will face double whammy

By David Slade
The Post and Courier
Sunday, September 23, 2007



People buying homes in future will face double whammy

This year brought large changes in the way South Carolinians are taxed to pay for public schools, but there's more to come.

In 2007 the statewide sales tax went up to 6 percent and the property tax on owner-occupied homes that paid for the operation of schools was eliminated.

Next year, there's expected to be an additional property tax cut for homeowners, in county and municipal taxes, because the state's higher sales tax raised more money than needed to reimburse schools for the forgone property tax money.

But the really big property tax changes will come from the reassessment cap that voters approved with a constitutional referendum, and new caps on property tax increases.

The limit on tax increases bars local and county governments, and school districts, from raising their property tax rates more than allowed by a formula based on consumer price inflation and population growth.

However, governing bodies can exceed the caps for specific purposes ranging such as the need to cover a budget shortfall from the previous year, responding to a natural disaster, or paying for unfunded state or federal mandates.

While the tax limits aim to keep a lid on tax rates, the assessment cap will dramatically shift property taxation in the coming years from longtime property owners to property owners who recently moved or relocated.

The new rules say that when there's a reassessment, which typically happens every five years, the taxable value of a property can't be increased by more than 15 percent unless it was sold or substantially improved.

Reassessment is the process in which counties recalculate how much properties are worth for the purpose of taxing them.

The cap means that if someone owns a home currently worth $200,000 for tax purposes, and five years from now it's worth $300,000 and there's a reassessment, the cap would limit that home's taxable value to $230,000, as long as the same person still owns it. However, if the home were sold, it would be taxed on its full $300,000 value.

Putting limits on the taxable value of some property also means there will be less property value to tax, so tax rates would have to rise more than they would have without caps to produce the same amount of revenue. For those who buy property years in the future, it's a double whammy.

For those who own property and keep it for a long time, the limits on assessments and tax rates would eliminate much of the uncertainty about property taxes, which under the old system could soar during a reassessment, or due to large tax rate increases.

The state Board of Economic Advisors has estimated the tax cap would redistribute $372 million in property tax over the next five years, mostly to properties reassessed at higher values when they are sold.

Reach David Slade at 937-5552 or dslade@postandcourier.com.

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Comments

beemz (anonymous) says...

wooooshhhhhhhhhhhh wiping the sweat from my brow,we bought our house in time to not get slam with the double whammy i hope...

September 23, 2007 at 3:27 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

RTC (anonymous) says...

This is not good for all of the young people that are saving up for their first home.
By the time they have enough saved for the down payment then they will have a much higher mortgage payment to make.

September 23, 2007 at 10:16 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

majorjohnson (anonymous) says...

Property taxes weren't the problem to begin with. The people with the budgets and state/federal mandates were. Higher budgets require higher property taxes. I keep hearing that budgets haven't been raised for years, but if that were true with the amount of growth in the Charleston area the millage would have gone down and people would have been paying less in property taxes. And you can't do hundreds of millions of dollars worth of building schools in an area of 100,000 people without the taxpayers shelling out thousands of dollars each.

September 23, 2007 at 2:51 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

charleston (anonymous) says...

So if I understand correctly a home owner in downtown Charleston can be paying $3500 for his property tax and the neighbor next door -perhaps even in the same condo complex -can be paying $7000 in property tax, same spec'd home. I definitely believe this property tax change is going to put significant downward pressure on property appreciation. Incidently, what happens when a property depreciates in this new tax construct?

September 24, 2007 at 5:31 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

kesterhenderson (anonymous) says...

Beware - yellow Journalism at work: The headlines and the author - tell readers what the paper wants you to believe -that the 15% reassessment value cap is good for everyone except future buyers who get a double whammy-Not true and absurd. The 15% Cap is a $372 million tax break for the wealthiest property owners in the state paid for by everybody else. I suggest the author revisit the BEA Report.

What the article didn't tell you: Those getting a double whammy are the thousands of longtime low and middle-income real estate and all personal property owners (motor vehicles, mobile home owners, boats, and other propery classifications) who do not benefit from the Cap. They will suffer from the 20% sales tax increase and the Cap and will pay the lions share of the statewide $372 million Tax break for wealthy real-estate owners-including their mansions, beachfront villas. second homes, rentals, and other commercial business).

Thanks to the 700,000 duped into voting yes to admendment #4 South Carolina now has a constitution that OK"s unfair and unequal sharing of the property tax burden in direct violation of the "equal treatment"mandates of our Federal Copnstitution.

October 30, 2007 at 9:51 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!

Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Thank you for your interest in this story. The comment thread for this article has been closed.


Hot Topics

 



.Link.