C of C to get new logo

Committee aims to revamp school marketing

The Post and Courier
Saturday, September 15, 2007


Committee aims to revamp school marketing

The College of Charleston is getting a marketing makeover, complete with a new logo.

Mike Haskins, vice president for marketing, said marketing officials and other campus groups have spent nearly a year exploring a new look — changing the logo, color palette and typefaces. It's all part of giving the school a new brand, he said.

"The whole idea of branding is to showcase yourself and show what's unique about your institution," he said. The school needs "a coherent, cohesive identity," he said.

Stein Communications is working on the logo, he said. The Atlanta-based company works exclusively with higher education clients. So far the company has pitched one design to replace the decades-old logo that features historic Randolph Hall. Many campus groups looked at it, Haskins said.

Many campus groups looked at the new logo idea, which featured a wrought-iron theme, and most of them liked the concept. But "they didn't love it," he said. The company will incorporate feedback from many different campus groups and present some more options, Haskins said. The new logo should be done early next semester.

"The Randolph Hall logo was well-respected and many people have a deep-seated affection for it," said Brian McGee, chairman of the department of communication and a member of the marketing committee that's working on the logo.

Many colleges have logos that feature buildings. "It's not distinctive or recognizable," McGee said. The school needs a logo that's better than "pick your oldest building on campus," he said.

Haskins said the new logo needs to showcase history, the campus environment and a connection to the city of Charleston.

Seaton Brown, a junior and member of the marketing committee, said most students he's talked with want a new logo. They want it to demonstrate history and tradition, he said. But they also want it to somehow show the things they're proud of at the college today.

Board of Trustees chairman Bobby Marlowe said there's no way the marketing department will find one logo that will make everybody happy. But the college is shooting for one that's "generally embraced by the overall community." He said he'd personally like the school to adopt a logo that's dignified and that "says something about history, education and Charleston."

"I don't think that has to be a building," Marlowe said.

McGee said the committee that's working on the logo is a very inclusive one with representatives from many campus groups. He thinks that anyone with reservations about adopting a new logo will feel more at ease when they finally see it.

Until then, "they fear a campus committee is going to muck up a good thing," he said.

Haskins said he's pleased that there's a buzz on campus about the new logo. "For so long people on this campus have thought this is a great institution. They want to get that out to a wider audience."

Reach Diane Knich at 937-5491 or dknich@postandcourier.com.

Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story  Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version  

Copy and paste the link:

Comments

postman01 (anonymous) says...

As a C of C grad, I makes me mad to think of the time, money, attention, and effort being completely wasted here. The Randolph Hall logo is known to DECADES of students and alumni. The total success of the school means this is competely unnecessary. The school has a "coherent and cohesive identity" right now and has for a long time. A new logo will not achieve any of the things being claimed. I find it particularly annoying that INTELLIGENT people are falling for the utterly absurd insult to our intelligence that these two individual's public comments and ultimately thought processes represent. How about a small break per student in the tuition and a total scrapping of this pink elephant?

September 15, 2007 at 12:13 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

est8esq (anonymous) says...

Didn't they just do this a few years ago anyway?! They took a fairly strong and fierce looking side cut of a cougar logo that was used for sports throughout the success of the Kresse era, and adopted a couple of reserved and wholly underwhelming designs based on the 4th century initiative and the College's desire of being a more southern version of "refined" schools like William and Mary et al. I hate to think of the time and money wasted here. It's simple - for the sports programs, use a fierce looking logo the student's can get behind and be excited over, and for all matters academic and social, use the classic and beloved seal showing randolph hall. The student government and the president's office, in conjunction with the athletic department, could accomplish this in a matter of weeks without any cost or much debate.

September 15, 2007 at 4:49 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

est8esq (anonymous) says...

One more thing - Bobby Marlowe should know that there's nothing more "historic, educational, or Charleston" than Randolph Hall and the cistern area. Something tells me that a beloved fraternity brother of both Bobby and myself, who is respected by thousands of alumni and friends, Dr. Harry Freeman, who attended college classes in that building, taught generations of college classes in that building, and as a student watched his best friends walk out of that building the day after the Japs bombed Pearl Harbor - men who, as Dr. Freeman always remembers with tears in his eyes, never returned home from war - would be appalled much like the rest of us alumni who adore that seal and logo. It's not a "pick the oldest building on campus" logo. It's a beloved symbol of the College known to all that matter and care based upon the fact that it IS and WAS the College. I'll be very disappointed if this changes at the hands of a man who, because of the organization(s) he was involved in as a student and alumnus, should have a greater grasp upon the deep historical fabric of our alma mater. When alumni and students invision CofC, the most common thing other than a basketball that comes to mind is Randolph Hall, Porter's Lodge, and the Cistern yard.

I equate this to changing the seal/logo at USC, the Citadel, or Clemson. Only difference is that it wouldn't happen there.

September 15, 2007 at 5:20 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!

Full terms and conditions can be read here.





.Link.