Support school uniform policy

Monday, September 10, 2007


School uniforms achieve a variety of beneficial purposes when all students in a particular school wear them. Officials at Harleyville-Ridgeville Elementary School want to encourage their use without making them mandatory. Unfortunately, full participation isn't likely with an optional program.

The Harleyville-Ridgeville school is the first in Dorchester District 4 to try uniforms. Students have the options of white or light blue shirts and khaki or dark blue trousers or skirts.

Some parents who have decided their children won't wear uniforms are complaining to school and district officials. They contend that the school's plan to encourage uniforms by incentives will negatively affect their children.

The school, in contrast, reports a generally positive response to the uniform policy. School officials decided to try school uniforms after the idea was supported by a majority of parents in a survey last school year. There are numerous reasons to back their use.

Clearly uniforms curtail fashion competition among children. Their use eliminates a potential source of labeling by students, reducing classroom cliques and the resultant conflicts among students.

Uniforms also eliminate discussion over what constitutes appropriate attire for the school environment, and allow school officials to avoid conflicts over dress code enforcement.

And they reduce costs for parents by cutting back-to-school expenses for clothing. With school uniforms, students don't require as many outfits.

Mandatory wearing of uniforms is the rule in the Charleston County schools where they are used. Since the policy was begun 12 years ago, well over half of Charleston schools now require them. That speaks to the success of the policy.

Dorchester 4 District officials, including the school board, should support Harleyville-Ridgeville's move toward uniforms, recognizing that they eliminate a potential distraction to the academic program. The experiment in the elementary school may recommend their mandatory use elsewhere in the district.



Share this story:
E-mail this story E-mail this story Printer-friendly version Printer-friendly version   Add this

Notice about comments:
The Post and Courier is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. The Post and Courier does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our Web site.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Comments

This article has  0 comment(s)


Sponsored Links