Plan would protect neighborhood integrity

By Robert Behre
The Post and Courier
Monday, October 29, 2007




Photo of Robert Behre

Most everyone around here is familiar with the idea of historic districts — parts of town recognized for their old buildings and significant events.

But Charlestonians now may need to get used to hearing about "conservation" districts.

These aren't necessarily historic, at least not in the traditional sense, but they're parts of town that have landmarks, homes, views or landscapes that may be worthy of more attention and protection than they have at the present time.

"It's not just buildings that are historic and important," says Yvonne Fortenberry, head of the Charleston's Department of Design, Development and Preservation. "Preservation is a bigger issue that's broader than structures."

Take Byrnes Downs, for instance.

Horse-drawn carriages are not going to clomp down the leafy streets of this mid-20th-century neighborhood just off Savannah Highway anytime soon.

There's not going to be any rush to erect historical markers that detail the lives of former residents. Tour buses won't slow down traffic on Lyttleton Avenue.

But that doesn't mean that there's nothing to protect. The 1940s neighborhood is a collection of modest brick homes that aren't necessarily architecturally significant by themselves but that complement each other to create a coherent, attractive neighborhood.

So far, Charleston has been largely immune to the "tear down" trend that has plagued other cities. That's what happens when people buy a small home in an older neighborhood, tear it down and build something much bigger — something so out of scale with the rest of the neighborhood that its owners need all that interior space because if they spent any time outside, in their tiny yard, they would be bombarded with dirty looks from their neighbors.

Don't think it can't happen here, or that we shouldn't act before it does.

This isn't to say that the city's Board of Architectural Review's domain should extend up and down Savannah Highway and monitor what color home- owners paint their trim or where they install their satellite dishes.

But it is to say that there may be some new board — or some new zoning or height limits — that could help keep Byrnes Downs and other old, coherent neighborhoods intact. That's the general idea behind a "conservation district."

The idea of analyzing the character of new parts of the city and finding creative ways to preserve them is just one of many novel ideas contained in the draft version of the new Charleston Historic Preservation Plan —a plan that will be presented publicly three times this week.

The plan also looks at issues of accessibility, affordability and sustainability. It recommends the city pass a new ordinance requiring a minimal level of archaeology for anyone wanting to sink a new foundation into certain sensitive spots in the city.

Some recommendations could happen quickly, such as the idea of lowering the age of review. Currently, buildings in certain parts of Charleston must be 75 years old before the public has any say-so in their proposed demolition. That could drop to 50 years.

Other changes will take longer.

For instance, the city likely will move slowly on a recommendation to extend the Board of Architectural Review juris- diction to the interior of government buildings that are considered among the most significant in the city.

Eddie Bello, director of the city's architecture and preservation division, says the plan also recommends preserving a diversity of uses and creating a city preservation manual that would give homeowners free advice before they even put together an application to the BAR.

"I'm surprised," he says, "but a lot of people just don't know a lot about old buildings."

Robert Behre may be reached at 937-5771 or by fax at 937-5579. His e-mail address is rbehre@postandcourier.com, and his mailing address is 134 Columbus St., Charleston, SC 29403. 937-5771 or by at

Share this story:

Comments

trm2105 (anonymous) says...

This is good news for those that have already got theirs. These conservation districts achieve one thing really; preservation of property values. For those of us who haven't gotten ours it only means that it will be more difficult and costly.

It really seems we have an identity crisis here; conserving brick ranch homes from the 40's is ridiculous. Let the individuals conserve their own homes if they wish. Its one thing for a building to be historically significant and quite another for it to be old.

Who's going to challenge the infringement of first amendment rights with all these aesthetic controls? What's next, dictating the cut and color of our clothes? What's the difference?

October 29, 2007 at 9:33 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

Reader (anonymous) says...

Lots of people have challenged these sorts of programs on First Amendment grounds, and they have failed over and over and over again. You don't have a First Amendment right to demolish an historic house.

October 29, 2007 at 8:37 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

Notice about comments:

Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.

Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!

Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Thank you for your interest in this story. The comment thread for this article has been closed.


Hot Topics

 



.Link.