Cocaine suspect agrees to plea deal
Co-defendant of ex-treasurer Ravenel free on $25,000 bail
Co-defendant of ex-treasurer Ravenel free on $25,000 bail
COLUMBIA — One of former state Treasurer Thomas Ravenel's co-defendants in a federal cocaine case entered into a plea agreement Wednesday with federal authorities.
Michael Miller, who also goes by Hashmere and Hash and was previously described as a self-employed deejay, agreed to plead guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine and possession with the intent to distribute cocaine. Each count carries up to 20 years in prison and a maximum fine of $1 million, although the agreement indicates authorities would advocate that Miller receive a lighter sentence.
Michael Miller
An additional seven cocaine distribution
charges against Miller, 25, of Mount Pleasant, were dropped as part of the agreement.
Neither Miller nor his public defender Langdon Long could immediately be reached for comment.
Miller's next court appearance is scheduled for Nov. 13 in Columbia.
The case involving Ravenel, 45, and Miller became public in June when the men were indicted by a federal grand jury on cocaine charges. Authorities have said Miller sold Ravenel the drugs.
Ravenel, who resigned in July, confessed in September as part of a negotiated deal to using cocaine sporadically over the past two years and sharing it with friends.
As part of the agreements, both Ravenel and Miller admitted to being involved in the distribution of less than 100 grams of cocaine, down from the original charges involving five times that amount.
Ravenel, a multimillionaire Charleston real estate developer, remains free on $100,000 unsecured bond. He faces a maximum 20 years in prison and $1 million fine. Prosecutors have agreed to recommend a reduced sentence. A date for his sentencing as not been set.
Miller is free on a $25,000 secured bond after spending months in the Charleston County Detention Center on a state drug trafficking charge that was later dropped.
A third co-defendant Pasquale Pellicoro, a Mount Pleasant wine merchant, remains at large after being indicted in September in the case. A bench warrant was issued for his arrest.
In a telephone interview on the day he was scheduled for arraignment, Pellicoro, an Italian citizen, told The Post and Courier he was in Switzerland.
Assistant U.S. Attorney William Witherspoon said Wednesday Pellicoro has not made contact with federal agents since the days after his indictment.
"They're still looking for him," Witherspoon said. "I am very hopeful that we will find Mr. Pellicoro and bring him to justice."
The Associated Press contributed to this report. Reach Yvonne M. Wenger at (803) 799-9051 or ywenger@postandcourier.com.
E-mail this story
Printer-friendly version
Comments
shawnee (anonymous) says...
Why should any of these guys in this case deserve a reduced sentence?Is it because 2 of the defendents are rich!Again,a clear example of how our justice system treat the rich and the poor and black and whites differently when it comes to justice!What if all the defendents in this case were black, the results would've been more severe and totally different!
October 25, 2007 at 3:20 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
poorboy (anonymous) says...
Shawnee I couldn't agree fast enough. While I was reading the story I wondered the same thing. And if Ravenel hadn't been involved this "dejay hash" would have got the book slammed at him but the state doesn't want to look bias in this one. They both should get the max sentence! Just like you or I would get...
October 25, 2007 at 5:28 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
mggoose2000 (anonymous) says...
With prosecutors and judges practicing discrimination in making their deals and sentencing, it's no wonder the black community is constantly crying "foul".
However, money has always greased the skids and even though we know this to be true, we cannot do anything to stop it.
We can protest and write letters/emails until the cows come home; money talks and BS walks. That's the way of the world. At least both will be doing some time.
October 25, 2007 at 6:10 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
sjmehlhose (anonymous) says...
ALL the defendants should be doing hard time (20 or 30 years without the possibility of parole). Doesn't matter what color they are. People who deal AND use drugs are a plague on our society!!!
October 25, 2007 at 6:47 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
bribetaker (anonymous) says...
1. Plea bargains happen all the time. You may not like it but it's a part of our justice system. You usually see it when there are a lot of charges. Probably, many of those charges wouldn't have held up in court so the prosecutor shaves off a few of the questionable ones & strikes a deal. Again, people may not like it but this approach reduces the already heavy court workload.
2. Regarding the discrimination issue (that normally accounts for the majority of comments on this forum), a black man gets the benefit of a plea bargain so in this case, I don't see it.
October 25, 2007 at 7:46 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
LI58 (anonymous) says...
Mr. Ravenel should be sent to jail, no pleas and without any special treatment! Being the trusted Treasurer for the state of South Carolina, this man should be made an example of what happens when the narcotic laws are broken by trusted officals. If this was a police officer or state prosecutor who got caught, he would not receive such special treatment. Regardless of the quantity of drugs involved, this is a joke and the people of South Carolina should be in an uproar over this plea bargain.
October 25, 2007 at 8:01 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
carolinagal (anonymous) says...
If they were all black they probably would of all have previous records. I'm just sayin.........Statistics show it.
Although it did help that they had money to hire good attorneys- Its all about the money
October 25, 2007 at 9:14 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
MHA (anonymous) says...
I agree that had Ravenel not been involved in this case, Michael Miller would have received a more harsh sentence, but I don't think it has anything to do with race, this time it's economic prejudice. I'm sure no one wants comparisons between the two sentences and the ability to say the Ravenel got off easy.
As far as how light the sentences will most likely be... I think public officials should be held to higher standards than joe public and punishments for wrong doings should be tougher. We trust public officials with the well being of entire communities. They have to be held accountable.
October 25, 2007 at 9:23 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
My_50Cents_Worth (anonymous) says...
Carolinagal,
Don't try to wrap yourself in the safety of "statistics show"' state you source...since you cleave to these statistics. If you think for one second that this is the very first and perhaps only criminal activity your ex-treasurer has ever been involved in, you are naive! In spite of that, I am sure he does not have a PREVIOUS RECORD. Bottom line is that if this had been ANYONE else, regardless to race [since that seems to be the only thing that brings excitement to like minds] and with or without a PREVIOUS RECORD, the case would have been handled much differently.
October 25, 2007 at 9:47 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Southern1 (anonymous) says...
My_50Cents_Worth, I couldn't agree with you more! Does every single article in the paper have to have a racial agenda? I'm so tired of reading "If it were a black man this..." or "If it were a white man that..." The damn article could be about flying pigs in James Island and someone would still think that it is a crime against race.
October 25, 2007 at 10:19 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
nty05 (anonymous) says...
I have to agree with bribetaker- I am not seeing the racial disparity. Unless my eyes are deceiving me, shawnee, Michael Miller is black and has been recommended for a reduced sentence as well! How are you claiming the race card in this case?
October 25, 2007 at 10:34 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
My_50Cents_Worth (anonymous) says...
I meant "state YOUR source..."
October 25, 2007 at 10:49 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
topix (anonymous) says...
Regardless of WHO is involved, our justice system is in horrible shape. The prosecutors involved in most of these cases are taking pleas when they know they can convict. Why? Because they are worried about trying cases in front of juries. Think about that. Juries are full of people who don't listen to the facts, but are more concerned about how the accused looks, how they are dressed, how old they are, how much money they have, whether they're male/female, black/white...etc. Many jurors are like some of the posters on this site, they are only concerned about their own petty agendas and believe that their own perception of things is reality.
October 25, 2007 at 10:52 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Girleygirl (anonymous) says...
Early-don't forget about Baker whom got 3 years of probation after he stole over $300,000 from his employees. He was also on the run for 18 months before he was caught in Florida. So when they catch the man from Switzerland they will give him bond and he will run again.
October 25, 2007 at 11:08 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
greyrider (anonymous) says...
Pleas are a necessary evil when you've got a backlog of cases and violent criminals walking the streets awaiting their trials. I don't think there's so much a racial disparity as an economic one. The rich can afford the best lawyers who work the better plea deals. The poverty stricken blacks get slammed because they can't afford the lawyers, not becuase they're black. Poverty stricken whites get the same treatment. Money talks. I just wish people would quit listening.
October 25, 2007 at 11:35 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
commonsence (anonymous) says...
My_50Cents_Worth, "I couldn't agree with you more! Does every single article in the paper have to have a racial agenda?"
Yes it does. We are in Charleston, SC and this is the sad reality. Despite all the talk of the new south, everything still has to have a racial undertone. And we wonder why we can't move this state out of the bottom of the rankings.
October 25, 2007 at 11:47 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
dereksmith (anonymous) says...
Let's see, Ravenel-$100,000 bond, Miller-$25,000 bond. Yeah, I see the race bias.
October 25, 2007 at 11:56 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Southern1 (anonymous) says...
This story if anything demonstrates an economic disparity not a racial one
October 25, 2007 at 12:01 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
eyfigueroa (anonymous) says...
dereksmith-"Let's see, Ravenel-$100,000 bond, Miller-$25,000 bond. Yeah, I see the race bias." one was secured and the other was unsecured.
mayor: "Selling cocaine and snorting cocaine should be mutually exclusive punishments. Blacks should be treated differently than whites . If you're looking for justice just go to Leeds Ave. That's all you find, JUST US!"
hee hee hee. okay i'll take the bait. what do you mean by that?
October 25, 2007 at 12:23 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
RTC (anonymous) says...
If people only knew how many others are going to jail, because Ravenel is giving up every name he can think of to save his own hide.
I guess that is one of the reasons for the gag order, but people in the community already know a great deal, and they are talking.
October 25, 2007 at 1:52 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
carolinagal (anonymous) says...
common sense 50 cents. common sense. Plus- ever been to Leeds Ave. Jail? Ever been to Line Street?
Grey Rider is right - its not about black or white- its all about the green.
October 25, 2007 at 1:53 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
My_50Cents_Worth (anonymous) says...
Carolinagal:
It's nice to see you took the opportunity to flip-flop. You should use some common sense before you make comments that you can't support...You have proven with your double talking that common sense "ain't that common." YOU made a racial comment and went a step further by referring to "statistics" in a poor attempt to support it. Perhaps you should re-read what you wrote and note that long before your epiphany, it had been concluded that it is not about race...you took it there.
October 25, 2007 at 2:13 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
BPFROM843 (anonymous) says...
miller got a bond reduction because he sat on leeds ave since he was arrested he was just released on a reduced bond ravenel bonded out the same day because he had the money and both of them are talking like little girls
October 25, 2007 at 2:21 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
bigpappapump77 (anonymous) says...
Funny how Michael Miller has a smirk on his face in his pic. What justice system?
This scumbag has beaten the Feds and will be slinging dope again...coming soon to a neighborhood near you!
Wat up...dog! U strate, U strate???
October 25, 2007 at 3:20 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
carolinagal (anonymous) says...
50 cents- my comments stem from this one.
Posted by shawnee on October 25, 2007 at 3:20 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Why should any of these guys in this case deserve a reduced sentence?Is it because 2 of the defendents are rich!Again,a clear example of how our justice system treat the rich and the poor and black and whites differently when it comes to justice!What if all the defendents in this case were black, the results would've been more severe and totally different!
and I said had they been black they would have probably had previous records. Most black drug dealrs, or white ones for that matter are not first time offenders.
...Most violent crime in our country is committed by blacks. According to U.S. Department of Justice statistics, blacks commit 54 percent of murders, 42 percent of forcible rapes, 59 percent of robberies and 38 percent of aggravated assaults. For the most part, the victims are black. Ninety-three percent of murdered blacks were murdered by a black
because statistics show that black males account for 63% of all crimes in the us.....
.....because statistics show that black males account for 63% of all crimes in the us....
Google it...this is just 2 excerpts. So there- 50 cents...I aint talking out of my a$$.....
October 25, 2007 at 3:43 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
eyfigueroa (anonymous) says...
mayor: you've completely lost me. why should blacks be treated differently than whites?
crack is less expensive but powder cocaine is still illegal. that's like saying if you kill someone with a saturday nite special vs a lugar the owner of the cheaper gun should get more time than the one who bought a more expensive gun.
please enlighten me. perhaps i'm just stupid.
October 25, 2007 at 3:54 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
CHRISJIII (anonymous) says...
carolinagal: So Jeffrey Dahmer, BTK, The Unibomber, Ted Bundy, Tim McVey, Eileen Warnos, The Son of Sam, John Gacey, the Columbine killers, Eric Rudolph,the Green River killer, Charles Ng. They were all Black? Google that.
October 25, 2007 at 4:12 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
greyrider (anonymous) says...
Just to follow up carolinagal's comments, statistics are what they are. Numbers can't be racist. Here's something to consider. There are blacks all over the world, but these crime statistics only exist at these levels in America. The violent crime among blacks elsewhere is nowhere near this level (and no, wars in Africa don't count). Also, its usually concentrated in certain areas. It's cultural, not racial. Kids growing up need good role models. There ARE good black role models in America, Dwight Howard, Denzell Washington, Tony Dungy, etc, but too many black kids "look up to" the wrong element. If your "heroes" are gansta rappers or professional athletes with long criminal records.......
October 25, 2007 at 4:15 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
greyrider (anonymous) says...
CHRISJIII - None of the statistics carolinagal quoted were 100%. Yes, there are white scumbags, far too many of them. Here's something we all can agree on (I hope). There are way too many corrupt politicians because there are way too many apathetic Americans. We need dedicated, honest men and women as lawmakers, sheriffs, police chiefs and judges. All are elected or appointed by someone who's elected. If more people took election day seriously, a lot of the scumbag politicians (most of whom are white) would be out in street where they belong and we wouldn't even have to discuss corruption in the criminal justice system.
October 25, 2007 at 4:28 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
PROUDTOBEBLACK (anonymous) says...
CAROLINA GIRL I GUESS BLACKS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL OF THE CRIMES THAT ARE HAPPENING IN THE WORLD TODAY I HAVE BEEN READING THESE COMMENTS ON DIFFERENT STORIES THAT HAVE BEEN IN THE PAPER THESE LAST COUPLE OF MONTHS AND ITS FUNNY HOW YOU HAVE MADE RACIAL COMMENTS ON EVERY STORY THAT HAVE FEATURED A BLACK PERSON AND ON THE STORIES THAT THE WHITES HAVE BEEN THE OFFENDER YOU MAKE NO COMMENT THIS ONLY SHOWS THAT YOU ARE A REDNECK.
October 25, 2007 at 4:28 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
CHRISJIII (anonymous) says...
greyrider: you are correct in that numbers can't be racist, but the people who compile them can be. Numbers can be manipulated to say whatever the statistician wants them to. I do however see some truth in the second half of your comment.
October 25, 2007 at 4:31 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
carolinagal (anonymous) says...
I am proud of my heritage just as you are of yours...I NEVER said blacks are responsible for all crime- never. There are plenty of white scum bags out there too- islam, asian...the list goes on and on. And as far as me posting in the last couple of months... you got your wires crossed..It wasn't me. Just because you are black does not mean a thing to me - there are plenty of good black people too....There are well educated, well spoken, good citizes and then there are thugs and ganstas.
Get R done! Yall have fun now ya hear!
October 25, 2007 at 4:42 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Lynnusc85 (anonymous) says...
stand828, you pretty much summed it up for me!
October 25, 2007 at 6:29 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
whychallboisaydat (anonymous) says...
chall boi got jokes. chall boi ain kno nuttin bout thus case... why all dem boi always gettin busted for white and shut, when all yall boi dun white when yall boi bun young. i mean, shut. carolinagirl, yall boi racist. yall boi white and yall boi aint doin white. chall boi know where i can get a goose. goosey loosey. loosey mcchucken.
October 25, 2007 at 6:51 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
beespencer (anonymous) says...
translastion please.....
October 25, 2007 at 7:20 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
preachlove (anonymous) says...
My Guess:
Ravenel - Probation; House Arrest, Large Fine
Miller - 5 years, Small Fine
Miller is going to get the short end of the stick and both sentences will probably be a joke.
I definitely agree with the posters who have stated that it's more about the money than race in this case, even though race usually plays a factor. This case has gotten a lot of publicity and is being watched for fairness. However, if you have the money, you can buy attorneys like Andy Savage who know how to wheel and deal.
On a different note, WHEN are we going to find out about all those great "citizens" who were indulging in the nose candy at TRAV's house? There's always a lot going on behind the scenes and as most of us can agree, you can't trust the judicial system.
October 25, 2007 at 7:22 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
RTC (anonymous) says...
preachlove, read my former post. I'm telling you people are going down. They will all pay the price because of this rich _______. Color doesn't play into this except for the green kind.
October 25, 2007 at 7:29 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
whychallboisaydat (anonymous) says...
why all yall boi hatin? yall boi ain kno nuttin bout polotucs. dis man ravenel bun tryin to get a fix so dat man could had bun feel good. yall boi drank, but ain nobody say nuttin. let dat man do some white, he ain bun botherin noone. kno wha i say.
October 25, 2007 at 7:42 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
RTC (anonymous) says...
That is the poorest imitation of Gullah I have ever read. LOL
October 25, 2007 at 7:53 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
anon123 (anonymous) says...
Years ago, Arthur Ravenel was quoted as saying that we should "shoot down" planes of suspected drug smugglers and "machine-gun the survivors."
In the context of senseless, artificial battles like the War on Drugs, it's interesting to see those words come back to haunt him.
October 25, 2007 at 8:04 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
preachlove (anonymous) says...
RTC - I got your point re: rich ____. And I had to laugh about the poorest imitation of Gullah. I live on James Island and I know Gullah. I'm still laughing!!!
anon123 - Amen to that.
October 25, 2007 at 8:35 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
lyfe1007 (anonymous) says...
SORRY I MUST SAY THAT THIS IS A CASE OF WHITE VS. BLACK ALONG WITH WHO HAS THE GREEN (MONEY). ON OCT 11 ERIC ANCRUM WAS SENTENCE TO LIFE IN PRISON, BASCIALLY THE 2 CASES ARE NO DIFFERENT. THEY BOTH ARE INVOLVING ILLEGEL ACTIVITIES. BUT MR. ANCRUM WAS SENTENCE TO LIFE. NOW IF HIS CO-DEFFENDENT WAS WHITE AND WAS EX-TRESURER COULD HE HAVE HAD A LESSER SENTENCE? I FEEL WHAT IS GOOD FOR THE GEESE IS GOOD FOR THE GANDER.I FEEL THAT THE STATE REP SHOULD GET THE BOOK THROWN AT HIM BECAUSE HE WAS OUT REP. THE STATE AND BASICALLY HAS MADE THE STATE LOOK BAD. IF YOU THROW THE BOOK AT ON THROW THEM AT ALL. COME ON LET'S BE FAIR IN THIS SITUATION. BUT I ALSO MADE A COMMENT ON THE ANCRUM CASE ABOUT HOW THE WHITE MAN IS ALWAYS BEHIND THE SITUATION BUT IT'S THE BLACK MAN WHO GETS THE HARSHER TREATMENT. THIS NEEDS TO STOP.
October 25, 2007 at 8:40 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
whychallboisaydat (anonymous) says...
ain bun no gullah... yall boi bun gay up, kno wha i say. i live on da skreet wit dem boy on america skreet. i sling white, i sling green, i sling brown... yall boi like juju beez. i love that candy, it is really good. have you ever eaten a warhead and made a crazy face cause it was so sour. thats some fun stuff. stud muffins. chocolate muffin. chocolate snake. why dem boi complain bout ma real shiat. swizzle. smuffle. google. it all gets you to the same place. RAVENEL BRIDGE is hard to walk up, the second incline is the worst. it wears me out.
October 25, 2007 at 8:51 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
RTC (anonymous) says...
LOL...........
October 25, 2007 at 10:16 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
sumDJiam (anonymous) says...
my mom's got money, trust me. I'm not even getting a year in jail. mark my words. "you cant hurt a man with Money" may dad would always say
October 25, 2007 at 10:29 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
whychallboisaydat (anonymous) says...
my moms got honey, trust me. I'm not even goin to get a years worth of bread. mark my words. "you cant hurt a cheesestick with honey". my dad would always meow.
October 25, 2007 at 10:35 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
sumDJiam (anonymous) says...
^
...what he said.
October 25, 2007 at 11:52 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
justme2 (anonymous) says...
Preachlove, You are correct. I know Gullah too, I was raised up a GeeChee. That is is very poor imitation of it. That's a shame to kill it like that.
October 26, 2007 at 12:38 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
lillycollette (anonymous) says...
The mythological higher "ethical and professional" standards that public officials are allegedly held to are rarely if ever factored into criminal sentencing.
Those standards usually come into play after a conviction to remove the licensure / professional standing of the one convicted -- as rumor has it -- to protect the public from further risk (excuse my raucously rude laughter).
I do believe and agree with those who feel that corrupt public officials should be sentenced to stiffer criminal penalties upon conviction. We do "trust public officials with the well being of entire communities" -- AND THAT TRUST HAS GOT TO COUNT FOR SOMETHING.
While Ravenel / Miller may be spilling the beans on others in their clique, I am smart enough not to hold my breath waiting on public disclosure of that Who's Who.
October 26, 2007 at 4:46 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
bribetaker (anonymous) says...
Regarding whychallboisaydat, he no gullah boy, he be imitating Jamaican.....ya mon.....Irie!!
October 26, 2007 at 7:47 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
sumDJiam (anonymous) says...
if we ratted, the measley charges would be dropped by now. i doubt theyre interested in workin their way DOWN the ladder
October 26, 2007 at 4:53 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
anonymouschic (anonymous) says...
Most of the time media can be and is skewed... Unless u are directly involved with the situation you don't ever know what really happens. The media boosts things up just to keep the readers more interested. As you all may or may not know some innocent people are tricked into pleading guilty in some cases. Many innocent people have gone to jail, or been convicted for crimes they didn't commit, because of the ignorance of law officials. Serving years in prison for a crime someone else committed. People make mistakes. Think about that before you start name calling. Here's how I see this case...Miller could be rich (Heck he could've been one of the rich blacks Ravenelle hung with) for all we know, I mean it is pretty expensive to live in Mt.Pleasant, just because your black doesn't mean your poor. The way this situation is being handled could be based on pure money envolvement...For all you know Miller could be innocent?(I mean how many criminals do you see smiling in a mugshot), he just mixed with the wrong crowd, and this was his first offense he has no prior record, which is probably another leftout reason many of the federal charges were dropped. I don't believe he was directly involved. I believe they're mainly after Ravenele in this case, and now since miller's name was mixed up in this from the get go to satisfy the public they have to keep him tied up in it. How do you think his imediate family must feel about the whole situation. Going from no criminal record to something this big!...seems a little fishy to me. Let's dwell on that for a moment. And as far as Pelicoro goes, he's pretty much made it clear by the pure fact of him going M.I.A that he was involved.
October 27, 2007 at 1:15 a.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
sumDJiam (anonymous) says...
say goodnite to the badguy! you need people like me, so you can point your fingers, haha....
October 27, 2007 at 8:58 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Postandcourier.com is pleased to offer readers the enhanced ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Postandcourier.com does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not postandcourier.com. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "report abuse" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Users can now build user-to-user connections, follow friends' recent posts, add an avatar that fits their personality, and more. If you have posted here before you'll need to sign up again, or if you've never posted before, start now by signing up!
Full terms and conditions can be read here.